Literature DB >> 28472220

The spike-and-slab lasso Cox model for survival prediction and associated genes detection.

Zaixiang Tang1,2,3, Yueping Shen1,2, Xinyan Zhang3, Nengjun Yi3.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Large-scale molecular profiling data have offered extraordinary opportunities to improve survival prediction of cancers and other diseases and to detect disease associated genes. However, there are considerable challenges in analyzing large-scale molecular data.
RESULTS: We propose new Bayesian hierarchical Cox proportional hazards models, called the spike-and-slab lasso Cox, for predicting survival outcomes and detecting associated genes. We also develop an efficient algorithm to fit the proposed models by incorporating Expectation-Maximization steps into the extremely fast cyclic coordinate descent algorithm. The performance of the proposed method is assessed via extensive simulations and compared with the lasso Cox regression. We demonstrate the proposed procedure on two cancer datasets with censored survival outcomes and thousands of molecular features. Our analyses suggest that the proposed procedure can generate powerful prognostic models for predicting cancer survival and can detect associated genes.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The methods have been implemented in a freely available R package BhGLM ( http://www.ssg.uab.edu/bhglm/ ). CONTACT: nyi@uab.edu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author (2017). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28472220      PMCID: PMC5870779          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  23 in total

1.  Bayesian ensemble methods for survival prediction in gene expression data.

Authors:  Vinicius Bonato; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Bradley M Broom; Erik P Sulman; Kenneth D Aldape; Kim-Anh Do
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Pre-validation and inference in microarrays.

Authors:  Robert J Tibshirani; Brad Efron
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2002-08-22

3.  Predicting survival from microarray data--a comparative study.

Authors:  H M Bøvelstad; S Nygård; H L Størvold; M Aldrin; Ø Borgan; A Frigessi; O C Lingjaerde
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  A new initiative on precision medicine.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Harold Varmus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura J van 't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Augustinus A M Hart; Mao Mao; Hans L Peterse; Karin van der Kooy; Matthew J Marton; Anke T Witteveen; George J Schreiber; Ron M Kerkhoven; Chris Roberts; Peter S Linsley; René Bernards; Stephen H Friend
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Covariance analysis of censored survival data.

Authors:  N Breslow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

8.  Combining multidimensional genomic measurements for predicting cancer prognosis: observations from TCGA.

Authors:  Qing Zhao; Xingjie Shi; Yang Xie; Jian Huang; BenChang Shia; Shuangge Ma
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 13.994

9.  Assessing the clinical utility of cancer genomic and proteomic data across tumor types.

Authors:  Yuan Yuan; Eliezer M Van Allen; Larsson Omberg; Nikhil Wagle; Ali Amin-Mansour; Artem Sokolov; Lauren A Byers; Yanxun Xu; Kenneth R Hess; Lixia Diao; Leng Han; Xuelin Huang; Michael S Lawrence; John N Weinstein; Josh M Stuart; Gordon B Mills; Levi A Garraway; Adam A Margolin; Gad Getz; Han Liang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Network-based survival analysis reveals subnetwork signatures for predicting outcomes of ovarian cancer treatment.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Takayo Ota; Viji Shridhar; Jeremy Chien; Baolin Wu; Rui Kuang
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  19 in total

1.  BhGLM: Bayesian hierarchical GLMs and survival models, with applications to genomics and epidemiology.

Authors:  Nengjun Yi; Zaixiang Tang; Xinyan Zhang; Boyi Guo
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Group spike-and-slab lasso generalized linear models for disease prediction and associated genes detection by incorporating pathway information.

Authors:  Zaixiang Tang; Yueping Shen; Yan Li; Xinyan Zhang; Jia Wen; Chen'ao Qian; Wenzhuo Zhuang; Xinghua Shi; Nengjun Yi
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  WNT pathway signaling is associated with microvascular injury and predicts kidney transplant failure.

Authors:  Michael E Seifert; Joseph P Gaut; Boyi Guo; Sanjay Jain; Andrew F Malone; Feargal Geraghty; Deborah L Della Manna; Eddy S Yang; Nengjun Yi; Daniel C Brennan; Roslyn B Mannon
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Integration of immune and hypoxia gene signatures improves the prediction of radiosensitivity in breast cancer.

Authors:  Derui Yan; Shang Cai; Lu Bai; Zixuan Du; Huijun Li; Peng Sun; Jianping Cao; Nengjun Yi; Song-Bai Liu; Zaixiang Tang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Spike-and-slab type variable selection in the Cox proportional hazards model for high-dimensional features.

Authors:  Ryan Wu; Mihye Ahn; Hojin Yang
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 1.416

Review 6.  The Application of Bayesian Methods in Cancer Prognosis and Prediction.

Authors:  Jiadong Chu; N A Sun; Wei Hu; Xuanli Chen; Nengjun Yi; Yueping Shen
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.069

7.  Development and validation of m6A regulators' prognostic significance for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Xuecheng Pang; Xiang Zhang; Yue Huang; Sumin Qian
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Development and Validation of a Radiosensitivity Prediction Model for Lower Grade Glioma Based on Spike-and-Slab Lasso.

Authors:  Zixuan Du; Shang Cai; Derui Yan; Huijun Li; Xinyan Zhang; Wei Yang; Jianping Cao; Nengjun Yi; Zaixiang Tang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Identification of Vitamin D-related gene signature to predict colorectal cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Luping Bu; Fengxing Huang; Mengting Li; Yanan Peng; Haizhou Wang; Meng Zhang; Liqun Peng; Lan Liu; Qiu Zhao
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  IOAT: an interactive tool for statistical analysis of omics data and clinical data.

Authors:  Lanlan Wu; Fei Liu; Hongmin Cai
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.