Literature DB >> 28470678

Learning curve estimation in medical devices and procedures: hierarchical modeling.

Usha S Govindarajulu1, Marco Stillo1, David Goldfarb1, Michael E Matheny2,3, Frederic S Resnic4.   

Abstract

In the use of medical device procedures, learning effects have been shown to be a critical component of medical device safety surveillance. To support their estimation of these effects, we evaluated multiple methods for modeling these rates within a complex simulated dataset representing patients treated by physicians clustered within institutions. We employed unique modeling for the learning curves to incorporate the learning hierarchy between institution and physicians and then modeled them within established methods that work with hierarchical data such as generalized estimating equations (GEE) and generalized linear mixed effect models. We found that both methods performed well, but that the GEE may have some advantages over the generalized linear mixed effect models for ease of modeling and a substantially lower rate of model convergence failures. We then focused more on using GEE and performed a separate simulation to vary the shape of the learning curve as well as employed various smoothing methods to the plots. We concluded that while both hierarchical methods can be used with our mathematical modeling of the learning curve, the GEE tended to perform better across multiple simulated scenarios in order to accurately model the learning effect as a function of physician and hospital hierarchical data in the use of a novel medical device. We found that the choice of shape used to produce the 'learning-free' dataset would be dataset specific, while the choice of smoothing method was negligibly different from one another. This was an important application to understand how best to fit this unique learning curve function for hierarchical physician and hospital data.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GEE; GLME; hierarchical; learning curve; medical device; simulations

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28470678      PMCID: PMC6463283          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  28 in total

1.  Akaike's information criterion in generalized estimating equations.

Authors:  W Pan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Predictors of complications and learning curve using the Angio-Seal closure device following interventional and diagnostic catheterization.

Authors:  B S Warren; S G Warren; S D Miller
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  Assessing the learning curve effect in health technologies. Lessons from the nonclinical literature.

Authors:  Craig R Ramsay; Sheila A Wallace; Paul H Garthwaite; Andrew F Monk; Ian T Russell; Adrian M Grant
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 4.  Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologies.

Authors:  C R Ramsay; A M Grant; S A Wallace; P H Garthwaite; A F Monk; I T Russell
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  Statistical evaluation of learning curve effects in surgical trials.

Authors:  Jonathan A Cook; Craig R Ramsay; Peter Fayers
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  The learning curve in stapes surgery and its implication for training.

Authors:  M W Yung; J Oates
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007

7.  The effect of learning curve on the outcome of caesarean section.

Authors:  W Y Fok; L Y S Chan; T K H Chung
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  A propensity analysis of the risk of vascular complications after cardiac catheterization procedures with the use of vascular closure devices.

Authors:  Nipun Arora; Michael E Matheny; Carrie Sepke; Frederic S Resnic
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Appropriateness of learning curve for carotid artery stenting: an analysis of periprocedural complications.

Authors:  Fabio Verzini; Piergiorgio Cao; Paola De Rango; Gianbattista Parlani; Agostino Maselli; Lydia Romano; Lucia Norgiolini; Giuseppe Giordano
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  The StarClose Vascular Closure System: interventional results from the CLIP study.

Authors:  J B Hermiller; C Simonton; T Hinohara; D Lee; L Cannon; M Mooney; C O'Shaughnessy; H Carlson; R Fortuna; M Zapien; D R Fletcher; K DiDonato; T M Chou
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  2 in total

1.  Systematic review of the endoscopic enucleation of the prostate learning curve.

Authors:  Dmitry Enikeev; Andrey Morozov; Mark Taratkin; Vincent Misrai; Enrique Rijo; Alexei Podoinitsin; Svetlana Gabdullina; Thomas R W Herrmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Myths and Misconceptions of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation: Getting Past the Noise and on to the Signal.

Authors:  Penny Andrews; Joseph Shiber; Maria Madden; Gary F Nieman; Luigi Camporota; Nader M Habashi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.755

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.