Susan Catt1, J Sheward2, E Sheward2, H Harder3. 1. Sussex Health Outcomes Research and Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RX, UK. S.L.Catt@sussex.ac.uk. 2. Cancer United™ (charity No. 1155747), Millfield House, Station Road, Angmering, West Sussex, BN16 4HY, UK. 3. Sussex Health Outcomes Research and Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RX, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Exercise levels often decline following cancer diagnosis despite growing evidence of its benefits. Treatment side effects, older age, lack of confidence and opportunity to exercise with others in similar circumstances influence this. Our study explored the experiences of people attending a cancer-specific community-based exercise programme (CU Fitter™). METHODS: A survey distributed to those attending the programme gathered demographic/clinical information, self-reported exercise levels, information provision and barriers to/benefits of exercise. RESULTS: Sixty surveys were evaluable from 65/100 returned (62% female, 68% > 60 years, 66% breast/prostate cancer). Most (68%) were receiving treatment. Sixty-eight percent attended classes once or twice weekly. Fifty-five percent received exercise advice after diagnosis, usually from their hospital doctor/nurse. More (73%) had read about exercising, but less used the Internet to source information (32%). Self-reported exercise levels were higher currently than before diagnosis (p = 0.05). Forty-eight percent said their primary barrier to exercising was the physical impact of cancer/treatment. Improving fitness/health (40%) and social support (16%) were the most important gains from the programme. Many (67%) had made other lifestyle changes and intented to keep (50%) or increase (30%) exercising. CONCLUSIONS: This community-based cancer-specific exercise approach engaged people with cancer and showed physical, psychological, and social benefits. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Community-grown exercise initiatives bring cancer survivors together creating their own supportive environment. Combining this with instructors familiar with the population and providing an open-ended service may prove particularly motivating and beneficial. Further work is required to provide evidence for this.
PURPOSE: Exercise levels often decline following cancer diagnosis despite growing evidence of its benefits. Treatment side effects, older age, lack of confidence and opportunity to exercise with others in similar circumstances influence this. Our study explored the experiences of people attending a cancer-specific community-based exercise programme (CU Fitter™). METHODS: A survey distributed to those attending the programme gathered demographic/clinical information, self-reported exercise levels, information provision and barriers to/benefits of exercise. RESULTS: Sixty surveys were evaluable from 65/100 returned (62% female, 68% > 60 years, 66% breast/prostate cancer). Most (68%) were receiving treatment. Sixty-eight percent attended classes once or twice weekly. Fifty-five percent received exercise advice after diagnosis, usually from their hospital doctor/nurse. More (73%) had read about exercising, but less used the Internet to source information (32%). Self-reported exercise levels were higher currently than before diagnosis (p = 0.05). Forty-eight percent said their primary barrier to exercising was the physical impact of cancer/treatment. Improving fitness/health (40%) and social support (16%) were the most important gains from the programme. Many (67%) had made other lifestyle changes and intented to keep (50%) or increase (30%) exercising. CONCLUSIONS: This community-based cancer-specific exercise approach engaged people with cancer and showed physical, psychological, and social benefits. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Community-grown exercise initiatives bring cancer survivors together creating their own supportive environment. Combining this with instructors familiar with the population and providing an open-ended service may prove particularly motivating and beneficial. Further work is required to provide evidence for this.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer; Exercise; Health behaviour; Physical activity; Quality of life; Survivorship
Authors: Cheryl L Rock; Colleen Doyle; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Jeffrey Meyerhardt; Kerry S Courneya; Anna L Schwartz; Elisa V Bandera; Kathryn K Hamilton; Barbara Grant; Marji McCullough; Tim Byers; Ted Gansler Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Anna E Arthur; Ashley Delk; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; John D Christein; Carlo Contreras; James A Posey; Selwyn Vickers; Robert Oster; Laura Q Rogers Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2016-04-30 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Margaret L McNeely; Kirsten Suderman; Janice L Yurick; Kathryn Nishimura; Christopher Sellar; Paula A Ospina; Edith Pituskin; Harold Lau; Jacob C Easaw; Matthew B Parliament; Anil A Joy; S Nicole Culos-Reed Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 6.575