Literature DB >> 28467142

Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer by Using Three-dimensional Subharmonic Aided Pressure Estimation and Imaging with US Contrast Agents: Preliminary Experience.

Kibo Nam1, John R Eisenbrey1, Maria Stanczak1, Anush Sridharan1, Adam C Berger1, Tiffany Avery1, Juan P Palazzo1, Flemming Forsberg1.   

Abstract

Purpose To determine whether three-dimensional subharmonic aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) and subharmonic imaging can help predict the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Materials and Methods In this HIPAA-compliant prospective study, 17 women (age range, 45-70 years) scheduled to undergo neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer underwent ultrasonography (US) immediately before therapy and at completion of 10%, 60%, and 100% of chemotherapy. All patients provided written informed consent. At each examination, radiofrequency data were collected from SHAPE and subharmonic imaging during infusion of a US contrast agent. Maximum-frequency magnitude and mean intensity were calculated for SHAPE and subharmonic imaging. The signal differences in the tumor relative to the surrounding area were compared with the final treatment response by using the Student t test. Results Four patients left the study, and data from two patients were discarded because of technical problems. Eight patients completed the entire imaging protocol, and an additional three patients dropped out after the imaging session at completion of 10% of chemotherapy as a result of disease progression (these patients were counted as nonresponders). Patients' imaging outcomes consisted of six responders (tumor volume reduction >90%) and five partial responders or nonresponders. The results at completion of 10% of therapy showed that the subharmonic signal increased more in the tumor than in the surrounding area for responders than in partial responders or nonresponders (mean ± standard deviation, 3.23 dB ± 1.41 vs -0.88 dB ± 1.46 [P = .001], respectively, for SHAPE and 1.32 dB ± 0.73 vs -0.82 dB ± 0.88 [P = .002], respectively, for subharmonic imaging). Moreover, three patients whose tumor measurements initially increased were correctly predicted to be responders with SHAPE and subharmonic imaging after completion of 10% of therapy. Conclusion SHAPE and subharmonic imaging have the potential to help predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer as early as completion of 10% of therapy, albeit on the basis of a small sample size. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28467142      PMCID: PMC5621722          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017161683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  34 in total

Review 1.  Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: a new paradigm for combination therapy.

Authors:  R K Jain
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Pressure dependence of subharmonic signals from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  W T Shi; F Forsberg; J S Raichlen; L Needleman; B B Goldberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Quantitative analysis of vascular heterogeneity in breast lesions using contrast-enhanced 3-D harmonic and subharmonic ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Anush Sridharan; John R Eisenbrey; Priscilla Machado; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Annina Wilkes; Alexander Sevrukov; Robert F Mattrey; Kirk Wallace; Carl L Chalek; Kai E Thomenius; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 4.  Pre-treatment differences and early response monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients using magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review.

Authors:  R Prevos; M L Smidt; V C G Tjan-Heijnen; M van Goethem; R G Beets-Tan; J E Wildberger; M B I Lobbes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Paclitaxel decreases the interstitial fluid pressure and improves oxygenation in breast cancers in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: clinical implications.

Authors:  Alphonse G Taghian; Rita Abi-Raad; Sherif I Assaad; Adrian Casty; Marek Ancukiewicz; Eren Yeh; Peryhan Molokhia; Khaled Attia; Timothy Sullivan; Irene Kuter; Yves Boucher; Simon N Powell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Interstitial fluid pressure predicts survival in patients with cervix cancer independent of clinical prognostic factors and tumor oxygen measurements.

Authors:  M Milosevic; A Fyles; D Hedley; M Pintilie; W Levin; L Manchul; R Hill
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  High interstitial fluid pressure - an obstacle in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Carl-Henrik Heldin; Kristofer Rubin; Kristian Pietras; Arne Ostman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 8.  Releasing pressure in tumors: what do we know so far and where do we go from here? A review.

Authors:  Arlizan B Ariffin; Patrick F Forde; Saleem Jahangeer; Declan M Soden; John Hinchion
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Clinical and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on primary tumor reduction is correlated to survival in hormone receptor-positive but not hormone receptor-negative locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Sheng Chen; Yin Liu; Qian-Wen Ouyang; Liang Huang; Rong-Cheng Luo; Zhi-Ming Shao
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  Current approaches and challenges in monitoring treatment responses in breast cancer.

Authors:  Lindsey J Graham; Matthew P Shupe; Erika J Schneble; Frederick L Flynt; Michael N Clemenshaw; Aaron D Kirkpatrick; Chris Gallagher; Aviram Nissan; Leonard Henry; Alexander Stojadinovic; George E Peoples; Nathan M Shumway
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 4.207

View more
  10 in total

1.  Three-Dimensional Subharmonic Aided Pressure Estimation for Assessing Arterial Plaques in a Rabbit Model.

Authors:  Kibo Nam; Ji-Bin Liu; John R Eisenbrey; Maria Stanczak; Priscilla Machado; Jingzhi Li; Zhaojun Li; Ying Wei; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Impact of hydrostatic pressure on phase-change contrast agent activation by pulsed ultrasound.

Authors:  Saurabh Raut; Mawia Khairalseed; Arvin Honari; Shashank R Sirsi; Kenneth Hoyt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A Noninvasive Ultrasound Based Technique to Identify Treatment Responders in Patients with Portal Hypertension.

Authors:  Ipshita Gupta; Jonathan M Fenkel; John R Eisenbrey; Priscilla Machado; Maria Stanczak; Corinne E Wessner; Colette M Shaw; Cynthia Miller; Michael C Soulen; Kirk Wallace; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Sonoporation for Augmenting Chemotherapy of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jason Castle; Spiros Kotopoulis; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2020

5.  Ultrasound Pressure Estimation for Diagnosing Portal Hypertension in Patients Undergoing Dialysis for Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Priscilla Machado; Ipshita Gupta; Jonathan M Fenkel; Sriharsha Gummadi; Maria Stanczak; Corinne E Wessner; Colette M Shaw; Susan Schultz; Michael C Soulen; Kirk Wallace; John R Eisenbrey; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 6.  Ultrasound contrast agents: microbubbles made simple for the pediatric radiologist.

Authors:  Anush Sridharan; John R Eisenbrey; Flemming Forsberg; Norbert Lorenz; Ludwig Steffgen; Aikaterini Ntoulia
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-06-12

7.  A Retrospective Study of Chemotherapy and 3D-Image-Guided Afterloading Intracavitary Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Xiaojun Li; Cunlian An; Chunlan Feng; Jieren Sun; Huixiang Lu; Xiaodong Yang; Kaiping Wang; Ruimei Wang
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.501

8.  Optimal Control of SonoVue Microbubbles to Estimate Hydrostatic Pressure.

Authors:  Amanda Q X Nio; Alessandro Faraci; Kirsten Christensen-Jeffries; Jason L Raymond; Mark J Monaghan; Daniel Fuster; Flemming Forsberg; Robert J Eckersley; Pablo Lamata
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Diagnosing Portal Hypertension with Noninvasive Subharmonic Pressure Estimates from a US Contrast Agent.

Authors:  Ipshita Gupta; John R Eisenbrey; Priscilla Machado; Maria Stanczak; Corinne E Wessner; Colette M Shaw; Sriharsha Gummadi; Jonathan M Fenkel; Alison Tan; Cynthia Miller; Julia Parent; Susan Schultz; Michael C Soulen; Chandra M Sehgal; Kirk Wallace; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Hepatic Vein Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Subharmonic Imaging Signal as a Screening Test for Portal Hypertension.

Authors:  Priscilla Machado; Ipshita Gupta; Sriharsha Gummadi; Maria Stanczak; Corinne E Wessner; Jonathan M Fenkel; Colette M Shaw; Susan Shamini-Noori; Susan Schultz; Michael C Soulen; Chandra M Sehgal; Kirk Wallace; John R Eisenbrey; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.487

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.