Literature DB >> 25012266

Clinical and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on primary tumor reduction is correlated to survival in hormone receptor-positive but not hormone receptor-negative locally advanced breast cancer.

Sheng Chen1, Yin Liu, Qian-Wen Ouyang, Liang Huang, Rong-Cheng Luo, Zhi-Ming Shao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to examine the relationship between different methodologies for response evaluation and long-term survival estimation in patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) for breast cancer.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 569 patients who were diagnosed with LABC and received NCT followed by breast and axilla surgery. The RECIST 1.1 criteria and Miller-Payne (MP) grading scale were used to evaluate patient responses to NCT. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed to investigate the correlation between treatment response and long-term patient survival.
RESULTS: Clinical response (RFS [P < 0.001]; OS [P = 0.003]), pathological response evaluated by pCR (RFS [P < 0.001]; OS [P < 0.001]), and MP grade (RFS [P < 0.001]; OS [P < 0.001]) were significant predictors of risks of relapse and survival. However, in hormone receptor-positive (ER and/or PR+) subtypes, the clinical response (P = 0.004 for Luminal-A and P = 0.038 for Luminal-B) and MP grade (P = 0.002 for Luminal-A and P < 0.001 for Luminal-B) significantly predicted RFS independently according to multivariate Cox regression model. MP grade (P = 0.015 for Luminal-A and P = 0.009 for Luminal-B) also was an independent predictor of patients' OS. However, these two methods failed to predict patient survival in hormone receptor-negative (ER and PR-) subtypes.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the value of response evaluation methods varies for different breast cancer subtypes. Conceiving of further prospective approaches for new individualized response-evaluation models are needed in the neoadjuvant setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25012266     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3894-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  11 in total

1.  Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics analysis for prediction of breast cancers insensitive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Qianqian Xiong; Xuezhi Zhou; Zhenyu Liu; Chuqian Lei; Ciqiu Yang; Mei Yang; Liulu Zhang; Teng Zhu; Xiaosheng Zhuang; Changhong Liang; Zaiyi Liu; Jie Tian; Kun Wang
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer by Using Three-dimensional Subharmonic Aided Pressure Estimation and Imaging with US Contrast Agents: Preliminary Experience.

Authors:  Kibo Nam; John R Eisenbrey; Maria Stanczak; Anush Sridharan; Adam C Berger; Tiffany Avery; Juan P Palazzo; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Clinical and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with different chemotherapy regimens predicts the outcome of locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Shicong Tang; Ke Wang; Kai Zheng; Jiadong Liu; Hengyu Zhang; Mingjian Tan; Hongwan Li; Huimeng Li; Xin Tan; Dequan Liu; Rong Guo
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-10

4.  Radiomic signatures derived from multiparametric MRI for the pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Tiantian Bian; Zengjie Wu; Qing Lin; Haibo Wang; Yaqiong Ge; Shaofeng Duan; Guangming Fu; Chunxiao Cui; Xiaohui Su
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Circulating tumor cells may serve as a supplement to RECIST in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Ji Wang; Xinyang Wang; Rui Chen; Mengdi Liang; Minghui Li; Ge Ma; Tiansong Xia; Shui Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Role of vascular density and normalization in response to neoadjuvant bevacizumab and chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Sara M Tolaney; Yves Boucher; Dan G Duda; John D Martin; Giorgio Seano; Marek Ancukiewicz; William T Barry; Shom Goel; Johanna Lahdenrata; Steven J Isakoff; Eren D Yeh; Saloni R Jain; Mehra Golshan; Jane Brock; Matija Snuderl; Eric P Winer; Ian E Krop; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Cytoplasmic Cyclin E Expression Predicts for Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Cansu Karakas; Ashleigh M Francis; Min Jin Ha; Hannah F Wingate; Richard A Meena; Min Yi; Komal S Rasaputra; Angelica M Gutierrez Barrera; Banu Arun; Kim-Anh Do; Aysegul Sahin; Khandan Keyomarsi; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 13.787

8.  Higher efficacy and reduced adverse reactions in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer by using pegylated liposomal doxorubicin compared with pirarubicin.

Authors:  Weifang Liu; Wei Chen; Xiuxiang Zhang; Peng Zhao; Zhimin Fan; Lirong Bi; Di Wu; Sijie Li; Ming Yang; Tong Fu; Dong Song; Bing Han; Gang Zhao; Ye Du; Aiping Shi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Miller-Payne Grading and 70-Gene Signature Are Associated With Prognosis of Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early-Stage Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Liye Wang; Rongzhen Luo; Qianyi Lu; Kuikui Jiang; Ruoxi Hong; Kaping Lee; Ping Zhang; Danyang Zhou; Shusen Wang; Fei Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Value of Ki-67 expression in triple-negative breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin.

Authors:  Ruo-Xi Wang; Sheng Chen; Xi Jin; Zhi-Ming Shao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.