Literature DB >> 28466651

T2* Mapping of the Hip in Asymptomatic Volunteers with Normal Cartilage Morphology: An Analysis of Regional and Age-Dependent Distribution.

Tobias Hesper1, Christoph Schleich2, Alexander Buchwald1, Harish S Hosalkar3,4, Gerald Antoch2, Rüdiger Krauspe1, Christoph Zilkens1, Bernd Bittersohl1.   

Abstract

Objective To assess age-dependent and regional differences in T2* relaxation measurements in hip joint cartilage of asymptomatic volunteers at 3 T. Design Three age cohorts (cohort 1: age 20-30 years, 15 individuals; cohort 2: age 30-40 years, 17 individuals; cohort 3: age 40-50 years, 15 individuals) were enrolled. T2* values were obtained in the central and peripheral cartilage of the acetabulum and the femoral head in 7 regions (anterior to superior and posterior). Results T2* did not differ among age cohorts in acetabular cartilage (cohort 1: 24.65 ± 6.56 ms, cohort 2: 24.70 ± 4.83 ms, cohort 3: 25.81 ± 5.10 ms, P = 0.10) and femoral head cartilage (cohort 1: 27.08 ± 8.24 ms, cohort 2: 25.90 ± 7.82 ms, cohort 3: 26.50 ± 5.61 ms, P = 0.34). Analysis of the regional T2* distribution pattern indicates increased T2* values in the anterior, anterior-superior, superior-anterior, and the posterior-superior aspects of acetabular and femoral head cartilage. For acetabular cartilage, higher values were observed in the central region (25.90 ± 4.80 ms vs. 24.21 ± 4.05 ms, P < 0.0001) whereas femoral head cartilage did not reveal such differences (26.62 ± 5.74 ms vs. 26.37 ± 5.89 ms, P = 0.44). Conclusions The T2* analysis of presumably healthy hip joint cartilage does not seem to be stratified according to age in this population. Regional T2* variation throughout hip joint cartilage is apparent in this modality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  T2* mapping; age groups; cartilage; hip; magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28466651      PMCID: PMC5724674          DOI: 10.1177/1947603516684591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cartilage        ISSN: 1947-6035            Impact factor:   4.634


  27 in total

1.  Articular cartilage and the magic angle effect.

Authors:  J B Kneeland
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Ultrashort TE spectroscopic imaging (UTESI): application to the imaging of short T2 relaxation tissues in the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  Jiang Du; Atsushi M Takahashi; Christine B Chung
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Gadolinium retention in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus is dependent on the class of contrast agent.

Authors:  Alexander Radbruch; Lukas D Weberling; Pascal J Kieslich; Oliver Eidel; Sina Burth; Philipp Kickingereder; Sabine Heiland; Wolfgang Wick; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Martin Bendszus
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) in early knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Carl Johan Tiderius; Lars E Olsson; Peter Leander; Olle Ekberg; Leif Dahlberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Quantitative T2 mapping of knee cartilage: differentiation of healthy control cartilage and cartilage repair tissue in the knee with unloading--initial results.

Authors:  Tallal C Mamisch; Siegfried Trattnig; Sebastian Quirbach; Stefan Marlovits; Lawrence M White; Goetz H Welsch
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  T1ρ and T2 relaxation times are associated with progression of hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  M C Gallo; C Wyatt; V Pedoia; D Kumar; S Lee; L Nardo; T M Link; R B Souza; S Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Spectrum of T2* values in knee joint cartilage at 3 T: a cross-sectional analysis in asymptomatic young adult volunteers.

Authors:  Bernd Bittersohl; Harish S Hosalkar; Malte Sondern; Falk R Miese; Gerald Antoch; Rüdiger Krauspe; Christoph Zilkens
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  T2 mapping of hip articular cartilage in healthy volunteers at 3T: a study of topographic variation.

Authors:  Atsuya Watanabe; Chris Boesch; Klaus Siebenrock; Takayuki Obata; Suzanne E Anderson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  T2* mapping for articular cartilage assessment: principles, current applications, and future prospects.

Authors:  Tobias Hesper; Harish S Hosalkar; Daniela Bittersohl; Götz H Welsch; Rüdiger Krauspe; Christoph Zilkens; Bernd Bittersohl
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  Advanced Imaging in Femoroacetabular Impingement: Current State and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Bernd Bittersohl; Harish S Hosalkar; Tobias Hesper; Carl Johan Tiderius; Christoph Zilkens; Rüdiger Krauspe
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-07-24
View more
  3 in total

1.  Elite Rowers Demonstrate Consistent Patterns of Hip Cartilage Damage Compared With Matched Controls: A T2* Mapping Study.

Authors:  Bernd Bittersohl; Chiara Benedikter; Alexander Franz; Tobias Hesper; Christoph Schleich; Gerald Antoch; Harish S Hosalkar; Rüdiger Krauspe; Christoph Zilkens
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  T2*-Mapping of Acetabular Cartilage in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement at 3 Tesla: Comparative Analysis with Arthroscopic Findings.

Authors:  Tobias Hesper; Christina Neugroda; Christoph Schleich; Gerald Antoch; Harish Hosalkar; Rüdiger Krauspe; Christoph Zilkens; Bernd Bittersohl
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  What Is the Correlation Among dGEMRIC, T1p, and T2* Quantitative MRI Cartilage Mapping Techniques in Developmental Hip Dysplasia?

Authors:  Gerd Melkus; Paul E Beaulé; Geoffrey Wilkin; Kawan S Rakhra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.