OBJECTIVE: Current constraints aim to minimize the risk of radiation myelitis by the use of restrictive maximal spinal cord doses, commonly 50 Gy. However, several studies suggested that a dose-volume effect could exist. Based on these observations, we evaluated patients receiving potentially excessive doses to the spinal cord within minimal volumes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients receiving radiotherapy between June 2010 and May 2015 using the NovalisTM (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA; Brainlab, Heimstetten, Germany) radiosurgery system were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 56 patients with 62 treated lesions that had been prescribed radiation doses close to the spinal cord potentially higher than the common 50 Gy 2‑Gy equivalent-dose (EQD2) constraint were selected for further analysis. Of these patients, 26 with 31 lesions had no history of previous irradiation, while 30 patients with 31 lesions had been previously irradiated within the treatment field. RESULTS: According to different dose evaluation approaches (spinal canal, spinal cord contour), 16 and 10 out of 31 primary irradiated lesions infringed constraints. For the 16 lesions violating spinal canal doses, the maximum doses ranged from 50.5 to 61.9 Gy EQD2. Reirradiated lesions had an average and median cumulative dose of 70.5 and 69 Gy, respectively. Dose drop-off was steep in both groups. Median overall survival was 17 months. No radiation myelitis or radiomorphological alterations were observed during follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study adds to the increasing body of evidence indicating that excessive spinal cord doses within a minimal volume, especially in a reirradiation setting with topographically distinct high-point doses, may be given to patients after careful evaluation of treatment- and tumor-associated risks.
OBJECTIVE: Current constraints aim to minimize the risk of radiation myelitis by the use of restrictive maximal spinal cord doses, commonly 50 Gy. However, several studies suggested that a dose-volume effect could exist. Based on these observations, we evaluated patients receiving potentially excessive doses to the spinal cord within minimal volumes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients receiving radiotherapy between June 2010 and May 2015 using the NovalisTM (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA; Brainlab, Heimstetten, Germany) radiosurgery system were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 56 patients with 62 treated lesions that had been prescribed radiation doses close to the spinal cord potentially higher than the common 50 Gy 2‑Gy equivalent-dose (EQD2) constraint were selected for further analysis. Of these patients, 26 with 31 lesions had no history of previous irradiation, while 30 patients with 31 lesions had been previously irradiated within the treatment field. RESULTS: According to different dose evaluation approaches (spinal canal, spinal cord contour), 16 and 10 out of 31 primary irradiated lesions infringed constraints. For the 16 lesions violating spinal canal doses, the maximum doses ranged from 50.5 to 61.9 Gy EQD2. Reirradiated lesions had an average and median cumulative dose of 70.5 and 69 Gy, respectively. Dose drop-off was steep in both groups. Median overall survival was 17 months. No radiation myelitis or radiomorphological alterations were observed during follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study adds to the increasing body of evidence indicating that excessive spinal cord doses within a minimal volume, especially in a reirradiation setting with topographically distinct high-point doses, may be given to patients after careful evaluation of treatment- and tumor-associated risks.
Authors: Hendrik P Bijl; Peter van Luijk; Rob P Coppes; Jacobus M Schippers; Antonius W T Konings; Albert J van Der Kogel Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Carsten Nieder; Anca L Grosu; Nicolaus H Andratschke; Michael Molls Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-11-02 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Arjun Sahgal; Lijun Ma; Iris Gibbs; Peter C Gerszten; Sam Ryu; Scott Soltys; Vivian Weinberg; Shun Wong; Eric Chang; Jack Fowler; David A Larson Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Hendrik P Bijl; Peter van Luijk; Rob P Coppes; Jacobus M Schippers; Antonius W T Konings; Albert J van der Kogel Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2003-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038