Literature DB >> 33635395

Cumulative dose, toxicity, and outcomes of spinal metastases re-irradiation : Systematic review on behalf of the Re-Irradiation Working Group of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO).

Antonio Pontoriero1, Sara Lillo2, Luciana Caravatta3, Fabiana Bellafiore4, Silvia Longo5, Elisabetta Lattanzi6, Silvana Parisi7, Francesco Fiorica8, Mariangela Massaccesi9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify patient-, tumor-, or treatment-related factors which may affect disease-related outcomes of re-irradiation (reRT) in patients with previously irradiated vertebral metastases.
METHODS: A computerized search of the literature was performed by searching for terms related to reRT and spinal metastases in MEDLINE, EMBASE, OVID, and the Cochrane database from 1995 to 2019. Studies including at least 10 patients who had received reRT at the same site of initial radiotherapy for vertebral metastases with localized external beam radiotherapy were included. To determine the pooled ≥G3 acute and late toxicity rate, pain relief, local control, and overall survival, a meta-analysis technique of single-arm studies was performed.
RESULTS: Nineteen studies including 1373 patients met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The pooled pain relief, neurological improvement, 1‑year local control, and 1‑year overall survival rates were 74.3%, 73.8%, 78.8%, and 54.6%, respectively, with moderate to high heterogeneity among studies. No difference in heterogeneity was evidenced for pain relief or local control after omitting studies not using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or studies delivering biologically effective dose (BED) < 45 Gy10, whereas heterogeneity for 1‑year OS was lower after omitting studies not using SBRT and delivering BED < 45 Gy10. The pooled results of grade ≥ 3 acute and late toxicity were 0.4% (95% confidence interval: 0.1-1.2%) and 2.2% (95% confidence interval: 1.2-37%), respectively, with low heterogeneity among studies.
CONCLUSION: While this systematic review confirmed that reRT is both safe and effective for treating patients with recurrent spinal metastases, it could not identify factors which may affect outcomes of reRT in this patient population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pain; Radiotherapy; Retreatment; SBRT; Spinal cord

Year:  2021        PMID: 33635395     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01748-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  32 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of reirradiation for painful bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Merel Huisman; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Joost W Wijlemans; Marco van Vulpen; Yvette M van der Linden; Helena M Verkooijen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  8Gy single-dose radiotherapy is effective in metastatic spinal cord compression: results of a phase III randomized multicentre Italian trial.

Authors:  Ernesto Maranzano; Fabio Trippa; Michelina Casale; Sara Costantini; Marco Lupattelli; Rita Bellavita; Luigi Marafioti; Stefano Pergolizzi; Anna Santacaterina; Marcello Mignogna; Giovanni Silvano; Vincenzo Fusco
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 4.  Reirradiation spine stereotactic body radiation therapy for spinal metastases: systematic review.

Authors:  Sten Myrehaug; Arjun Sahgal; Motohiro Hayashi; Marc Levivier; Lijun Ma; Roberto Martinez; Ian Paddick; Jean Régis; Samuel Ryu; Ben Slotman; Antonio De Salles
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2017-07-14

5.  The effect of a single fraction compared to multiple fractions on painful bone metastases: a global analysis of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study.

Authors:  E Steenland; J W Leer; H van Houwelingen; W J Post; W B van den Hout; J Kievit; H de Haes; H Martijn; B Oei; E Vonk; E van der Steen-Banasik; R G Wiggenraad; J Hoogenhout; C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; G van Tienhoven; R Wanders; J Pomp; M van Reijn; I van Mierlo; E Rutten; J Leer; T van Mierlo
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Spinal cord constraints in the era of high-precision radiotherapy : Retrospective analysis of 62 spinal/paraspinal lesions with possible infringements of spinal cord constraints within a minimal volume.

Authors:  Sebastian Zschaeck; Peter Wust; Reinhold Graf; Waldemar Wlodarczyk; Reinhard Schild; Alexander Henry Thieme; Mirko Weihrauch; Volker Budach; Pirus Ghadjar
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Quality of life after palliative radiation therapy for patients with painful bone metastases: results of an international study validating the EORTC QLQ-BM22.

Authors:  Liang Zeng; Edward Chow; Gillian Bedard; Liying Zhang; Alysa Fairchild; Vassilios Vassiliou; Mohamed A Alm El-Din; Reynaldo Jesus-Garcia; Aswin Kumar; Fabien Forges; Ling-Ming Tseng; Ming-Feng Hou; Wei-Chu Chie; Andrew Bottomley
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  Proposal of human spinal cord reirradiation dose based on collection of data from 40 patients.

Authors:  Carsten Nieder; Anca L Grosu; Nicolaus H Andratschke; Michael Molls
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Single versus multiple fractions of repeat radiation for painful bone metastases: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Edward Chow; Yvette M van der Linden; Daniel Roos; William F Hartsell; Peter Hoskin; Jackson S Y Wu; Michael D Brundage; Abdenour Nabid; Caroline J A Tissing-Tan; Bing Oei; Scott Babington; William F Demas; Carolyn F Wilson; Ralph M Meyer; Bingshu E Chen; Rebecca K S Wong
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  The linear-quadratic model is inappropriate to model high dose per fraction effects in radiosurgery.

Authors:  John P Kirkpatrick; Jeffrey J Meyer; Lawrence B Marks
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.934

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Palliative Care in the Metastatic Spinal Tumors. A Systematic Review on the Radiotherapy and Surgical Perspective.

Authors:  Giuseppe Roberto Giammalva; Gianluca Ferini; Fabio Torregrossa; Lara Brunasso; Sofia Musso; Umberto Emanuele Benigno; Rosa Maria Gerardi; Lapo Bonosi; Roberta Costanzo; Federica Paolini; Paolo Palmisciano; Giuseppe Emmanuele Umana; Rina Di Bonaventura; Carmelo Lucio Sturiale; Domenico Gerardo Iacopino; Rosario Maugeri
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.