Timothy E Schultheiss1. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Cancer Center, 1500 Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA. schultheiss@coh.org
Abstract
PURPOSE: To characterize the radiation dose-response of the human spinal cord. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Because no single institution has sufficient data to establish a dose-response function for the human spinal cord, published reports were combined. Requisite data were dose and fractionation, number of patients at risk, number of myelopathy cases, and survival experience of the population. Eight data points for cervical myelopathy were obtained from five reports. Using maximum likelihood estimation correcting for the survival experience of the population, estimates were obtained for the median tolerance dose, slope parameter, and alpha/beta ratio in a logistic dose-response function. An adequate fit to thoracic data was not possible. Hyperbaric oxygen treatments involving the cervical cord were also analyzed. RESULTS: The estimate of the median tolerance dose (cervical cord) was 69.4 Gy (95% confidence interval, 66.4-72.6). The alpha/beta = 0.87 Gy. At 45 Gy, the (extrapolated) probability of myelopathy is 0.03%; and at 50 Gy, 0.2%. The dose for a 5% myelopathy rate is 59.3 Gy. Graphical analysis indicates that the sensitivity of the thoracic cord is less than that of the cervical cord. There appears to be a sensitizing effect from hyperbaric oxygen treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The estimate of alpha/beta is smaller than usually quoted, but values this small were found in some studies. Using alpha/beta = 0.87 Gy, one would expect a considerable advantage by decreasing the dose/fraction to less than 2 Gy. These results were obtained from only single fractions/day and should not be applied uncritically to hyperfractionation.
PURPOSE: To characterize the radiation dose-response of the human spinal cord. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Because no single institution has sufficient data to establish a dose-response function for the human spinal cord, published reports were combined. Requisite data were dose and fractionation, number of patients at risk, number of myelopathy cases, and survival experience of the population. Eight data points for cervical myelopathy were obtained from five reports. Using maximum likelihood estimation correcting for the survival experience of the population, estimates were obtained for the median tolerance dose, slope parameter, and alpha/beta ratio in a logistic dose-response function. An adequate fit to thoracic data was not possible. Hyperbaric oxygen treatments involving the cervical cord were also analyzed. RESULTS: The estimate of the median tolerance dose (cervical cord) was 69.4 Gy (95% confidence interval, 66.4-72.6). The alpha/beta = 0.87 Gy. At 45 Gy, the (extrapolated) probability of myelopathy is 0.03%; and at 50 Gy, 0.2%. The dose for a 5% myelopathy rate is 59.3 Gy. Graphical analysis indicates that the sensitivity of the thoracic cord is less than that of the cervical cord. There appears to be a sensitizing effect from hyperbaric oxygen treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The estimate of alpha/beta is smaller than usually quoted, but values this small were found in some studies. Using alpha/beta = 0.87 Gy, one would expect a considerable advantage by decreasing the dose/fraction to less than 2 Gy. These results were obtained from only single fractions/day and should not be applied uncritically to hyperfractionation.
Authors: Milan Vosmik; Jiri Petera; Igor Sirak; Miroslav Hodek; Petr Paluska; Jiri Dolezal; Marcela Kopacova Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2010-11-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Christina Kehl Cramer; James D Ververs; Frederick Scott Jones; Wesley Hsu; Michael David Chan; Stacey Quintero Wolfe Journal: J Radiosurg SBRT Date: 2019
Authors: Lindsay Hwang; Christian C Okoye; Ravi B Patel; Arjun Sahgal; Matthew Foote; Kristin J Redmond; Christoph Hofstetter; Rajiv Saigal; Mahmud Mossa-Basha; William Yuh; Nina A Mayr; Samuel T Chao; Eric L Chang; Simon S Lo Journal: J Radiosurg SBRT Date: 2019
Authors: Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Timothy Ritter; Douglas J Quint; Suresh Senan; Laurie E Gaspar; Ritsuko U Komaki; Coen W Hurkmans; Robert Timmerman; Andrea Bezjak; Jeffrey D Bradley; Benjamin Movsas; Lon Marsh; Paul Okunieff; Hak Choy; Walter J Curran Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-10-08 Impact factor: 7.038