| Literature DB >> 28464873 |
Yanbing Lv1, Ruili Wu2, Kunrui Feng3, Jinjie Li1, Qing Mao3, Hang Yuan3, Huaibin Shen1, Xiangdong Chai4, Lin Song Li5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The conventional and widely used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), due to specificity and high-sensitivity, were suitable in vitro diagnosis. But enzymes are vulnerable to the external conditions, and the complex operation steps limit its application. Semiconductor quantum dots have been successfully used in biological and medical research due to the high photoluminescence and high resistance to photobleaching. In this study, we have developed a novel quantum dot-labeled immunosorbent assay for rapid disease detection of C-reactive protein (CRP).Entities:
Keywords: C-reactive protein; Fluorescence-linked immunosorbent assay; Fluorescent probe; Quantum dots
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28464873 PMCID: PMC5414212 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-017-0267-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 10.435
Scheme 1A schematic illustration of FLISA procedure
Scheme 2Formation of QD labeled antibody
Fig. 1Fluorescence spectra (a), dynamic light scattering (b), and agarose gel electrophoresis imaging (c) of the aqueous CdSe/ZnS QDs and QDs-mAb; and PL intensity of FLISA with different antigen concentrations (d)
Fig. 2The PL intensity of QDs-mAb in various pH (a) and in different buffers (b). Fluorescence spectra of QDs-mAb in Tris buffer solutions with different ionic strengths (c). The PL intensity of QDs-mAb probes versus different storage time (d) in Tris buffer solution
Optimization of working concentration
| Coating antibody | 10 μg/mL | 5 μg/mL | 1 μg/mL | 0.1 μg/mL | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAg (ng/mL) | 0 | 1 | 50 | 0 | 1 | 50 | 0 | 1 | 50 | 0 | 1 | 50 | |
| D | 1:100 | 33,506 | 39,216 | 614,441 | 30,142 | 35,891 | 640,496 | 27,993 | 41,092 | 635,737 | 32,337 | 29,902 | 40,606 |
| 1:200 | 27,232 | 36,745 | 495,871 | 29,246 | 36,645 | 619,561 | 25,237 | 32,604 | 507,215 | 28,922 | 27,300 | 36,226 | |
| 1:300 | 26,143 | 31,833 | 344,716 | 27,453 | 34,398 | 427,663 | 22,174 | 33,261 | 388,885 | 27,790 | 27,253 | 31,046 | |
| 1:400 | 25,002 | 31,137 | 240,503 | 27,130 | 30,330 | 247,904 | 22,373 | 32,398 | 192,264 | 28,985 | 28,918 | 29,168 | |
D The dilution ration of QDs-mAb probe
Fig. 3Evolution of PL intensity in different fluorescence developing time (a) and optimal fluorescence developing time (b)
Fig. 4Photoluminescence spectra from FLISA for determination of CRP antigen (a) and standard curves (b) (n = 3)
Imprecision the intra-assay and the extra-assay
| Standard of CRP (ng/mL) | Intra-assay | Extra-assay | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st batch (CV %) | 2nd batch (CV %) | 3rd batch (CV %) | Avergae (CV %) | |
| Low | 8.29 ± 0.63 (7.67) | 7.28 ± 0.72 (9.91) | 7.56 ± 0.75 (9.96) | 7.50 ± 1.09 (14.5) |
| Middle | 46.57 ± 3.01 (6.45) | 48.43 ± 3.64 (7.52) | 43.71 ± 2.46 (5.62) | 46.24 ± 3.48 (7.54) |
| High | 200.73 ± 18.38 (4.17) | 203.35 ± 15.34 (7.54) | 193.53 ± 10.79 (5.57) | 199.21 ± 11.79 (5.92) |
Recoveries of different concentrations of antigen in human negative serum
| Sample | Experimental value (ng/mL) | Theroratical value (ng/mL) | Recovery (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | 312.7 | 300 | 104.2 | 3.43 |
| P2 | 146.6 | 150 | 97.7 | 5.81 |
| P3 | 71.52 | 75 | 95.4 | 5.19 |
| P4 | 10.57 | 10 | 105.7 | 8.48 |
| P5 | 5.28 | 5 | 105.6 | 9.07 |
Fig. 5Cross-reactionof FLISA (a), and comparison of results for CRP concentrations by FLISA and Roche immunoturbidimetry (b)