Literature DB >> 28464749

Contouring and dose calculation in head and neck cancer radiotherapy after reduction of metal artifacts in CT images.

Christian Rønn Hansen1,2, Rasmus Lübeck Christiansen1, Ebbe Laugaard Lorenzen1, Anders Smedegaard Bertelsen1, Jon Thor Asmussen3, Niels Gyldenkerne4, Jesper Grau Eriksen2,4, Jørgen Johansen4, Carsten Brink1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Delineation accuracy of the gross tumor volume (GTV) in radiotherapy planning for head and neck (H&N) cancer is affected by computed tomography (CT) artifacts from metal implants which obscure identification of tumor as well as organs at risk (OAR). This study investigates the impact of metal artifact reduction (MAR) in H&N patients in terms of delineation consistency and dose calculation precision in radiation treatment planning.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Tumor and OAR delineations were evaluated in planning CT scans of eleven oropharynx patients with streaking artifacts in the tumor region preceding curative radiotherapy (RT). The GTV-tumor (GTV-T), GTV-node and parotid glands were contoured by four independent observers on standard CT images and MAR images. Dose calculation was evaluated on thirty H&N patients with dental implants near the treated volume. For each patient, the dose derived from the clinical treatment plan using the standard image set was compared with the recalculated dose on the MAR image dataset.
RESULTS: Reduction of metal artifacts resulted in larger volumes of all delineated structures compared to standard reconstruction. The GTV-T and the parotids were on average 22% (p < 0.06) and 7% larger (p = 0.005), respectively, in the MAR image plan compared to the standard image plan. Dice index showed reduced inter-observer variations after reduction of metal artifacts for all structures. The average surface distance between contours of different observers improved using the MAR images for GTV and parotids (p = 0.04 and p = 0.01). The median volume receiving a dose difference larger than ±3% was 2.3 cm3 (range 0-32 cm3).
CONCLUSIONS: Delineation of structures in the head and neck were affected by metal artifacts and volumes were generally larger and more consistent after reduction of metal artifacts, however, only small changes were observed in the dose calculations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT artifact; GTV; O-MAR; contouring; dental implants; head and neck; metal artefact

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28464749     DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1287427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  8 in total

1.  Co-registration of radiotherapy planning and recurrence scans with different imaging modalities in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Morten Horsholt Kristensen; Christian Rønn Hansen; Ruta Zukauskaite; Jørgen Johansen; Eva Samsøe; Christian Maare; Anne Ivalu Sander Holm; Jesper Grau Eriksen
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-06-30

2.  Three-Dimensional Guided Zygomatic Implant Placement after Maxillectomy.

Authors:  Nathalie Vosselman; Haye H Glas; Bram J Merema; Joep Kraeima; Harry Reintsema; Gerry M Raghoebar; Max J H Witjes; Sebastiaan A H J de Visscher
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-06

3.  The effects of the orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O-MAR) algorithm on contouring and dosimetry of head and neck radiotherapy patients.

Authors:  Jussi Sillanpaa; Michael Lovelock; Boris Mueller
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 1.482

4.  Effect of dental metal artifact conversion volume on dose distribution in head-and-neck volumetric-modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Kenta Kitagawa; Hitoshi Ikushima; Motoharu Sasaki; Shunsuke Furutani; Takashi Kawanaka; Akiko Kubo; Chisato Tonoiso; Takaharu Kudoh; Yosuke Kano; Akira Tsuzuki
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Impact of metal artifact reduction algorithm on gross tumor volume delineation in tonsillar cancer: reducing the interobserver variation.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Fukugawa; Ryo Toya; Tomohiko Matsuyama; Takahiro Watakabe; Yoshinobu Shimohigashi; Yudai Kai; Tadashi Matsumoto; Natsuo Oya
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 2.795

6.  Automated detection of dental artifacts for large-scale radiomic analysis in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Colin Arrowsmith; Reza Reiazi; Mattea L Welch; Michal Kazmierski; Tirth Patel; Aria Rezaie; Tony Tadic; Scott Bratman; Benjamin Haibe-Kains
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-04-21

7.  Online daily assessment of dose change in head and neck radiotherapy without dose-recalculation.

Authors:  Jason R Vickress; Jerry Battista; Rob Barnett; Slav Yartsev
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  A cost-minimization analysis of measures against metallic dental restorations for head and neck radiotherapy.

Authors:  Kouji Katsura; Yoshihiko Soga; Sadatomo Zenda; Hiromi Nishi; Marie Soga; Masatoshi Usubuchi; Sachiyo Mitsunaga; Ken Tomizuka; Tetsuhito Konishi; Wakako Yatsuoka; Takao Ueno; Tadanobu Aragaki; Takafumi Hayashi
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.724

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.