Literature DB >> 28462447

Predictive Power of the NSQIP Risk Calculator for Early Post-Operative Outcomes After Whipple: Experience from a Regional Center in Northern Ontario.

Henry Y Jiang1,2, Erica L Kohtakangas2, Kengo Asai1,2, Jeffrey B Shum3,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: NSQIP Risk Calculator was developed to allow surgeons to inform their patients about their individual risks for surgery. Its ability to predict complication rates and length of stay (LOS) has made it an appealing tool for both patients and surgeons. However, the NSQIP Risk Calculator has been criticized for its generality and lack of detail towards surgical subspecialties, including the hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) surgery. We wish to determine whether the NSQIP Risk Calculator is predictive of post-operative complications and LOS with respect to Whipple's resections for our patient population. As well, we wish to identify strategies to optimize early surgical outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent elective Whipple's procedure for benign or malignant pancreatic head lesions at Health Sciences North (Sudbury, Ontario), a tertiary care center, from February 2014 to August 2016. Comparisons of LOS and post-operative complications between NSQIP-predicted and actual ones were carried out. NSQIP-predicted complications rates were obtained using the NSQIP Risk Calculator through pre-defined preoperative risk factors. Clinical outcomes examined, at 30 days post-operation, included pneumonia, cardiac events, surgical site infection (SSI), urinary tract infection (UTI), venous thromboembolism (VTE), renal failure, readmission, and reoperation for procedural complications. As well, mortality, disposition to nursing or rehabilitation facilities, and LOS were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 40 patients underwent Whipple's procedure at our center from February 2014 to August 2016. The average age was 68 (50-85), and there were 22 males and 18 females. The majority of patients had independent baseline functional status (39/40) with minimal pre-operative comorbidities. The overall post-operative morbidity was 47.5% (19/40). The rate of serious complication was 17.5% with four Clavien grade II, two grade III, and one grade V complications. One mortality occurred within 30 days after surgery. NSQIP Risk Calculator was predictive for the majority of post-surgical complication types, including pneumonia, SSI, VTE, reoperation, readmission, and disposition to rehabilitation or nursing home. Our center appears to have a higher rate of UTI than NSQIP predicted (O/E = 3.9), as well, the rate of cardiac complication (O/E = 3.1) also appears to be higher at our center. With respect to readmission rates (O/E = 0.6) and renal failure (O/E = 0), NSQIP provided overestimated rates. The average LOS was 11.9 ± 0.9 days, which was not significantly different from the average LOS of 11.5 ± 0.3 days predicted by NSQIP (p = 0.3). Overall, 80% of discharges occurred less than or within 3 days of that predicted by NSQIP.
CONCLUSION: NSQIP Risk Calculator is predictive of post-operative complications and LOS for patients who have undergone Whipple's at our center. A more HPB-focused NSQIP calculator may accurately project post-operative complication in the pre-operative period. Nevertheless, the generic NSQIP has allowed us to examine our existing practice of post-operative care and has paved way to reduce cardiac and urinary complications in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NSQIP risk prediction; Post-operative complications; Whipple’s procedure

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28462447     DOI: 10.1007/s12029-017-9949-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer


  23 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Massimiliano Greco; Giovanni Capretti; Luigi Beretta; Marco Gemma; Nicolò Pecorelli; Marco Braga
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals.

Authors:  Bruce L Hall; Barton H Hamilton; Karen Richards; Karl Y Bilimoria; Mark E Cohen; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Limitations of ACS-NSQIP in reporting complications for patients undergoing pancreatectomy: underscoring the need for a pancreas-specific module.

Authors:  Irene Epelboym; Irmina Gawlas; James A Lee; Beth Schrope; John A Chabot; John D Allendorf
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Improved Surgical Outcomes for ACS NSQIP Hospitals Over Time: Evaluation of Hospital Cohorts With up to 8 Years of Participation.

Authors:  Mark E Cohen; Yaoming Liu; Clifford Y Ko; Bruce L Hall
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  A Program to Prevent Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in Acute Care.

Authors:  Sanjay Saint; M Todd Greene; Sarah L Krein; Mary A M Rogers; David Ratz; Karen E Fowler; Barbara S Edson; Sam R Watson; Barbara Meyer-Lucas; Marie Masuga; Kelly Faulkner; Carolyn V Gould; James Battles; Mohamad G Fakih
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Postoperative morbidity index: a quantitative measure of severity of postoperative complications.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; Bruce L Hall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Preoperative factors predict perioperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  David Yu Greenblatt; Kaitlyn J Kelly; Victoria Rajamanickam; Yin Wan; Todd Hanson; Robert Rettammel; Emily R Winslow; Clifford S Cho; Sharon M Weber
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Variation in postoperative complication rates after high-risk surgery in the United States.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; Peter J Pronovost; John A Cowan; Pamela A Lipsett; James C Stanley; Gilbert R Upchurch
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  The patient safety in surgery study: background, study design, and patient populations.

Authors:  Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; Jennifer Daley; Olga Jonasson; R Scott Jones; Darrell A Campbell; Aaron S Fink; Robert M Mentzer; Janet E Steeger
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  After Pancreatectomy, the “90 Days from Surgery” Definition Is Superior to the “30 Days from Discharge” Definition for Capture of Clinically Relevant Readmissions.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Mise; Ryan W Day; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Kristoffer W Brudvik; Lilian Schwarz; Laura Prakash; Nathan H Parker; Matthew H G Katz; Claudius Conrad; Jeffrey E Lee; Jason B Fleming; Thomas A Aloia
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  5 in total

1.  Evaluating the ACS NSQIP Risk Calculator in Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: Results from the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group.

Authors:  Apeksha Dave; Eliza W Beal; Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar; George Poultsides; Eleftherios Makris; Flavio G Rocha; Zaheer Kanji; Sean Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Victoria R Rendell; Ryan C Fields; Bradley A Krasnick; Kamran Idrees; Paula Marincola Smith; Hari Nathan; Megan Beems; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy M Pawlik; Carl R Schmidt; Mary E Dillhoff
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Efficacy and utility of robotic single-access bilateral nephrectomy (r-SABN) in end-stage renal disease patients.

Authors:  Gilbert Pan; Jeffrey Campsen; Robin D Kim; George Rofaiel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-08-09

3.  Length of Stay After Joint Arthroplasty is Less Than Predicted Using Two Risk Calculators.

Authors:  Colin J Carr; Simon C Mears; C Lowry Barnes; Jeffrey B Stambough
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.435

4.  Experiences with the standardized classification of surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo) in general surgery patients.

Authors:  M Bolliger; J-A Kroehnert; F Molineus; D Kandioler; M Schindl; P Riss
Journal:  Eur Surg       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 0.953

5.  Risk assessment in aortic aneurysm repair by medical specialists versus the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk calculator outcomes.

Authors:  Jan van Schaik; Tessa M Hers; Carla Sp van Rijswijk; Maaike S Schooneveldt; Hein Putter; Daniël Eefting; Joost R van der Vorst
Journal:  JRSM Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-04-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.