OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to characterize variation in complication rates across hospitals with differing volumes for select high-risk operations in the United States. METHODS: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for 1996 and 1997 were analyzed for 3 high-risk operations: esophagectomy (n=1,226), pancreatectomy (n=4,789), and intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (n=11,863). Complications evaluated included aspiration, cardiac complications, infection, pneumonia, pulmonary failure, renal failure, septicemia, and others. The risk of complications was calculated by hospital volume deciles, as well as for high-volume hospitals (HVH) and low-volume hospitals (LVH) defined by median hospital volume. RESULTS: Rates of any postoperative complication varied nearly 2-fold across hospital volume groups. The proportion of patients across hospital deciles having at least one complication ranged from 30% to 51% for esophageal resection, 6% to 12% for pancreatic resection, and 9% to 18% for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. HVH had lower rates of one or more complications after pancreatic resection (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.83; P=.002), esophageal resection (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.90; P=.008), and intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.76; P<.001). Patients with one or more complications after pancreatic resection had a mortality of 18.8% versus only 5.2% for those without complications (P<.001). Esophageal resection mortality was 16.9% for patients with at least one complication and 2.5% for those without complications (P<.001) and AAA repair mortality was 10.4% for patients with at least one complication and 2.9% for those without complications (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk operations have a decreased rate of postoperative complications when performed at HVH. Variation in complication rates may contribute to the volume-outcome relationship and provide a focus for quality improvement at LVH.
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to characterize variation in complication rates across hospitals with differing volumes for select high-risk operations in the United States. METHODS: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for 1996 and 1997 were analyzed for 3 high-risk operations: esophagectomy (n=1,226), pancreatectomy (n=4,789), and intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (n=11,863). Complications evaluated included aspiration, cardiac complications, infection, pneumonia, pulmonary failure, renal failure, septicemia, and others. The risk of complications was calculated by hospital volume deciles, as well as for high-volume hospitals (HVH) and low-volume hospitals (LVH) defined by median hospital volume. RESULTS: Rates of any postoperative complication varied nearly 2-fold across hospital volume groups. The proportion of patients across hospital deciles having at least one complication ranged from 30% to 51% for esophageal resection, 6% to 12% for pancreatic resection, and 9% to 18% for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. HVH had lower rates of one or more complications after pancreatic resection (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.83; P=.002), esophageal resection (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.90; P=.008), and intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.76; P<.001). Patients with one or more complications after pancreatic resection had a mortality of 18.8% versus only 5.2% for those without complications (P<.001). Esophageal resection mortality was 16.9% for patients with at least one complication and 2.5% for those without complications (P<.001) and AAA repair mortality was 10.4% for patients with at least one complication and 2.9% for those without complications (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk operations have a decreased rate of postoperative complications when performed at HVH. Variation in complication rates may contribute to the volume-outcome relationship and provide a focus for quality improvement at LVH.
Authors: N Tjarda van Heek; Koert F D Kuhlmann; Rob J Scholten; Steve M M de Castro; Olivier R C Busch; Thomas M van Gulik; Huug Obertop; Dirk J Gouma Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: A W C Kow; S P Chan; A Earnest; C Y Chan; K Lim; S Y Chong; K H Lim; C K Ho; S P Chew; K H Liau Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2008 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Daphne Roos; Lea M Dijksman; Brigitte M Sondermeijer; Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten; Laurens T de Wit; Michael F Gerhards Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Donald E Low; Sonia Kunz; Drew Schembre; Henry Otero; Tom Malpass; Alex Hsi; Guobin Song; Richard Hinke; Richard A Kozarek Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2007-08-31 Impact factor: 3.452