Literature DB >> 28459709

The Humeral Implant in Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Jay D Keener1, Peter Nissen Chalmers, Ken Yamaguchi.   

Abstract

Humeral hemiarthroplasty, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty all rely on a prosthetic articular surface fixed to the proximal humerus. Humeral implant designs have changed considerably as a result of improved understanding of proximal humeral anatomy and prosthetic biomechanics. Fixed, monoblock implants have been superseded by modular implants with variable inclination, offset, version, and stem length. Press-fit designs now commonly have surface coatings that allow bony ingrowth. Metaphyseal fixation is often favored over diaphyseal fixation. Both cemented and noncemented fixation continue to be used, and each of these techniques has advantages and disadvantages. Although aseptic loosening rarely requires revision, complications, such as osteolysis, stress shielding, radiolucent lines, and proximal humeral bone loss, can occur. Humeral periprosthetic fractures continue to be a disabling complication and are difficult to manage. Innovations such as short-stemmed implants, stemless implants, and platform stems are currently under clinical investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28459709     DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  15 in total

1.  Value comparison of humeral component press-fit and cemented techniques in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Derek D Berglund; Dragomir Mijic; Tsun Yee Law; Jennifer Kurowicki; Samuel Rosas; Jonathan C Levy
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function.

Authors:  Jonathan C Levy; Derek Berglund; Rushabh Vakharia; Paul DeVito; Dimitri S Tahal; Dragomir Mijc; Bijan Ameri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  18F FDG-PET/CT has poor diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing shoulder PJI.

Authors:  Thomas Falstie-Jensen; J Lange; H Daugaard; M H Vendelbo; A K Sørensen; B Zerahn; J Ovesen; K Søballe; L C Gormsen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Preoperative Comorbidities and Postoperative Complications Do Not Influence Patient-Reported Satisfaction Following Humeral Head Resurfacing: Mid- to Long-term Follow-up of 106 Patients.

Authors:  Andrea Beck; Hannah Lee; Mitchell Fourman; Juan Giugale; Jason Zlotnicki; Mark Rodosky; Albert Lin
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2019-02-13

5.  Specific Design of a Press Fit Humeral Stem Provides low Stress Shielding in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty at minimum 5 Years FU.

Authors:  Geoffroy Nourissat; Simon Corsia; Howard W Harris; Pierre-Alban Bouché
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2022-07-06

6.  Humeral stem with low filling ratio reduces stress shielding in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Su Cheol Kim; Jong Hun Park; Hashem Bukhary; Jae Chul Yoo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 7.  Short Stems and Stemless Shoulder Arthroplasty: Current Concepts Review.

Authors:  Berta Buch; María Vall; Paolo Consigliere; Josep Antón Guillén; Enric Cruz; Luis Natera
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-08

8.  Shoulder and elbow arthroplasty after ipsilateral fractures of the proximal and distal humerus in the elderly.

Authors:  Jorge H Nuñez; Montserrat Garcia-Portabella; Lledó Batalla; Josep Massons
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-01-01

9.  Cementless metaphyseal reverse shoulder arthroplasty: our preliminary experience.

Authors:  Gian Mario Micheloni; Gianpaolo Salmaso; Mattia Berti; Sara Bortolato; Gino Zecchinato; Alberto Momoli; Stefano Giaretta
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2019-01-10

10.  Current state of short-stem implants in total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Peter N Chalmers; Patrick J Denard; Reuben Gobezie; Anthony A Romeo; Evan S Lederman
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-01-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.