Magenta Bender Simmons1, Samantha Batchelor1, Tara Dimopoulos-Bick1, Deb Howe1. 1. Dr. Simmons is with Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, and with the Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Ms. Batchelor, Ms. Dimopoulos-Bick, and Ms. Howe are with Children and Young People's Mental Health and with headspace Gosford, Gosford, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In youth mental health services, consumer participation is essential, but few implementation strategies exist to engage young consumers. This project evaluated an intervention implemented in an Australian youth mental health service that utilized peer workers to promote shared decision making via an online tool. METHODS: All new clients ages 16-25 were invited to participate in this nonrandomized comparative study, which used a historical comparison group (N=80). Intervention participants (N=149) engaged with a peer worker and used the online tool before and during their intake assessment. Pre- and postintake data were collected for both groups; measures included decisional conflict, perceived shared decision making, and satisfaction. A series of paired t tests, analyses of variance, and multiple regressions were conducted to assess differences in scores across intervention and comparison groups and pre- and postintake assessments. RESULTS: Ratings of perceived shared decision making with intake workers were higher in the intervention group than in the comparison group (p=.015). In both groups, decisional conflict scores were significantly lower after the intake assessment (p<.001 for both groups). Both perceived shared decision making and lower decisional conflict were associated with satisfaction (p<.015). CONCLUSIONS: Young people who participated in an intervention that combined peer work and shared decision making reported feeling more involved in their assessment. Feeling involved and having lower decisional conflict after seeing an intake worker were important for client satisfaction. These findings demonstrate the importance of both peer work and shared decision making for promoting optimal outcomes in youth mental health services.
OBJECTIVE: In youth mental health services, consumer participation is essential, but few implementation strategies exist to engage young consumers. This project evaluated an intervention implemented in an Australian youth mental health service that utilized peer workers to promote shared decision making via an online tool. METHODS: All new clients ages 16-25 were invited to participate in this nonrandomized comparative study, which used a historical comparison group (N=80). Intervention participants (N=149) engaged with a peer worker and used the online tool before and during their intake assessment. Pre- and postintake data were collected for both groups; measures included decisional conflict, perceived shared decision making, and satisfaction. A series of paired t tests, analyses of variance, and multiple regressions were conducted to assess differences in scores across intervention and comparison groups and pre- and postintake assessments. RESULTS: Ratings of perceived shared decision making with intake workers were higher in the intervention group than in the comparison group (p=.015). In both groups, decisional conflict scores were significantly lower after the intake assessment (p<.001 for both groups). Both perceived shared decision making and lower decisional conflict were associated with satisfaction (p<.015). CONCLUSIONS: Young people who participated in an intervention that combined peer work and shared decision making reported feeling more involved in their assessment. Feeling involved and having lower decisional conflict after seeing an intake worker were important for client satisfaction. These findings demonstrate the importance of both peer work and shared decision making for promoting optimal outcomes in youth mental health services.
Entities:
Keywords:
Community mental health centers, Mental illness & mental retardation, Community psychiatry, Adolescents/adolescence, Shared decision making, Early intervention, Peer work, Peer support, Youth Mental Health
Authors: Patrick D McGorry; Cristina Mei; Andrew Chanen; Craig Hodges; Mario Alvarez-Jimenez; Eóin Killackey Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2022-02 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Karen L Fortuna; Amanda L Myers; Joelle Ferron; Arya Kadakia; Cynthia Bianco; Martha L Bruce; Stephen J Bartels Journal: J Ment Health Date: 2022-01-28
Authors: Janet Jull; Sascha Köpke; Maureen Smith; Meg Carley; Jeanette Finderup; Anne C Rahn; Laura Boland; Sandra Dunn; Andrew A Dwyer; Jürgen Kasper; Simone Maria Kienlin; France Légaré; Krystina B Lewis; Anne Lyddiatt; Claudia Rutherford; Junqiang Zhao; Tamara Rader; Ian D Graham; Dawn Stacey Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-11-08
Authors: Elizabeth C Thomas; John Suarez; Alicia Lucksted; Laura Siminoff; Irene Hurford; Lisa Dixon; Maria O'Connell; Mark Salzer Journal: Early Interv Psychiatry Date: 2021-02-17 Impact factor: 2.721
Authors: Victoria D Ojeda; Nev Jones; Michelle R Munson; Emily Berliant; Todd P Gilmer Journal: Early Interv Psychiatry Date: 2020-09-04 Impact factor: 2.721