Literature DB >> 28457192

Assessment of adherence and relative dose intensity with oral chemotherapy in oncology clinical trials at an academic medical center.

Jeff A Engle1, Anne M Traynor2, Toby C Campbell2,3, Kari B Wisinski2, Noelle LoConte2, Glenn Liu2, George Wilding4, Jill M Kolesar5.   

Abstract

Background/Aims Oral chemotherapy is increasingly utilized leaving the patient responsible for self-administering an often complex regimen where adverse effects are common. Non-adherence and reduced relative dose intensity are both associated with poorer outcomes in the community setting but are rarely reported in clinical trials. The purpose of this study is to quantify adherence and relative dose intensity in oncology clinical trials and to determine patient and study related factors that influence adherence and relative dose intensity. Methods Patients were identified from non-industry-funded clinical trials conducted between 1 January 2009 and 31 March 2013 at the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center. Data were extracted from primary research records. Descriptive statistics and linear regression modeling was performed using SAS 9.4. Results A total of 17 clinical trials and 266 subjects were included. Mean adherence was greater than 97% for the first eight cycles. Mean relative dose intensity was less than 90% for the first cycle and declined over time. Male gender, a performance status of 1 or 2, metastatic disease, and traveling more than 90 miles to reach the cancer center were associated with higher relative dose intensity. Conclusions Patients with cancer enrolled in clinical trials are highly adherent but unlikely to achieve protocol specified relative dose intensity. Given that determining the phase II dose is the primary endpoint of phase I trials, incorporating relative dose intensity into this determination should be considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oral chemotherapy; adherence; relative dose intensity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28457192      PMCID: PMC5932265          DOI: 10.1177/1078155217704989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract        ISSN: 1078-1552            Impact factor:   1.809


  29 in total

Review 1.  Adherence enhancing interventions for oral anticancer agents: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tim Mathes; Sunya-Lee Antoine; Dawid Pieper; Michaela Eikermann
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 2.  Adherence influencing factors in patients taking oral anticancer agents: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tim Mathes; Dawid Pieper; Sunya-Lee Antoine; Michaela Eikermann
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Quality of reporting of chemotherapy compliance in randomized controlled trials of breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Abdullah K Altwairgi; Ali H Alfakeeh; Wilma M Hopman; Wendy R Parulekar
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 4.  Adherence to oral antineoplastic agents by cancer patients: definition and literature review.

Authors:  F Bassan; F Peter; B Houbre; M J Brennstuhl; M Costantini; E Speyer; C Tarquinio
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 2.520

5.  Predictive value of phase I trials for safety in later trials and final approved dose: analysis of 61 approved cancer drugs.

Authors:  Denis L Jardim; Kenneth R Hess; Patricia Lorusso; Razelle Kurzrock; David S Hong
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Relative dose intensity and therapy efficacy in different breast cancer molecular subtypes: a retrospective study of early stage breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jia-Qi Yuan; Shou-Man Wang; Li-Li Tang; Jie Mao; Yu-Hui Wu; Jian Hai; Sha-Yang Luo; Hui-Ying Ou; Lei Guo; Li-Qiu Liao; Jun Huang; Yan Li; Zhi Xiao; Ke-Jing Zhang; Na Luo; Fei-Yu Chen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Evaluating the impact of Relative Total Dose Intensity (RTDI) on patients' short and long-term outcome in taxane- and anthracycline-based chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer- a pooled analysis.

Authors:  Sibylle Loibl; Tomas Skacel; Valentina Nekljudova; Hans Joachim Lück; Matthias Schwenkglenks; Thomas Brodowicz; Christoph Zielinski; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer: relative dose intensity and survival among veterans.

Authors:  Sherrie L Aspinall; Chester B Good; Xinhua Zhao; Francesca E Cunningham; Bernadette B Heron; Mark Geraci; Vida Passero; Roslyn A Stone; Kenneth J Smith; Renee Rogers; Jenna Shields; Megan Sartore; D Patrick Boyle; Sherry Giberti; John Szymanski; Doug Smith; Allen Ha; Jolynn Sessions; Shawn Depcinski; Shane Fishco; Irvin Molina; Tanja Lepir; Carmela Jean; Lymaris Cruz-Diaz; Jessica Motta; Rebeca Calderon-Vargas; Janelle Maland; Sean Keefe; Marshall Tague; Alice Leone; Brian Glovack; Blair Kaplan; Sean Cosgriff; Lindsay Kaster; Ivy Tonnu-Mihara; Kimmai Nguyen; Jenna Carmichael; Linda Clifford; Kan Lu; Gurkamal Chatta
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  Elderly patients' participation in clinical trials.

Authors:  Premnath Shenoy; Anand Harugeri
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

10.  Cohort study examining tamoxifen adherence and its relationship to mortality in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  C McCowan; J Shearer; P T Donnan; J A Dewar; M Crilly; A M Thompson; T P Fahey
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.