Literature DB >> 25956059

Relative dose intensity and therapy efficacy in different breast cancer molecular subtypes: a retrospective study of early stage breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Jia-Qi Yuan1, Shou-Man Wang, Li-Li Tang, Jie Mao, Yu-Hui Wu, Jian Hai, Sha-Yang Luo, Hui-Ying Ou, Lei Guo, Li-Qiu Liao, Jun Huang, Yan Li, Zhi Xiao, Ke-Jing Zhang, Na Luo, Fei-Yu Chen.   

Abstract

To investigate the relationship between chemotherapy dose intensity and therapy efficacy of different molecular subtypes. Clinical and pathological features of the patients with breast cancer were retreived from the hospital records. 315 patients were analyzed (251 showed clinical response, 38 acquired pCR). Patients with positive ER status, negative PR status, higher Ki67 level and higher RTDI had better therapy response. 13.5 and 84.5 % were identified the benchmark of Ki67 and RTDI, respectively. As the result of interior-subgroup comparison, luminal subgroups acquired better response rate when RTDI ≥ 84.5 %. In patients of luminal breast cancer, tumor size change arose from increasing of dose intensity and finally showed reached a plateau after RTDI ≥ 95 % (r (2) = 0.303, p < 0.001). As the result of intersubgroup comparison, TNBC patients were more likely to acquired better clinical and pathology response when RDTI < 84.5 %. Ki67 change arose sharply from increasing of dose intensity when RDTI < 84.5 % (r (2) = 0.656, p < 0.001), whereas the regression curve showed a terminal plateau in patients of RDTI ≥ 84.5 % (r (2) = 0.427, p < 0.001). Given lower RTDI, luminal patients are less likely to achieve response, and TNBC patients are associated with higher response rate. Dissimilar of therapy efficacy between luminal subtype and TNBC becomes inconspicuous as RTDI rises. Chemosensitivity may associate with dose intensity, especially in luminal subtypes, and tailored therapeutic strategies should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25956059     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3418-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  11 in total

1.  Assessment of adherence and relative dose intensity with oral chemotherapy in oncology clinical trials at an academic medical center.

Authors:  Jeff A Engle; Anne M Traynor; Toby C Campbell; Kari B Wisinski; Noelle LoConte; Glenn Liu; George Wilding; Jill M Kolesar
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 1.809

2.  Short-term and long-term prognostic value of histological response and intensified chemotherapy in osteosarcoma: a retrospective reanalysis of the BO06 trial.

Authors:  Eni Musta; Nan van Geloven; Jakob Anninga; Hans Gelderblom; Marta Fiocco
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  The Hippo Transducer YAP/TAZ as a Biomarker of Therapeutic Response and Prognosis in Trastuzumab-Based Neoadjuvant Therapy Treated HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Jia-Qi Yuan; Nian-Hua Ding; Zhi Xiao
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Impact of chemotherapy relative dose intensity on cause-specific and overall survival for stage I-III breast cancer: ER+/PR+, HER2- vs. triple-negative.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Qingzhao Yu; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Mei-Chin Hsieh; Michelle Loch; Vivien W Chen; Elizabeth Fontham; Tekeda Ferguson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Method to measure the mismatch between target and achieved received dose intensity of chemotherapy in cancer trials: a retrospective analysis of the MRC BO06 trial in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Carlo Lancia; Jakob Anninga; Cristian Spitoni; Matthew R Sydes; Jeremy Whelan; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Hans Gelderblom; Marta Fiocco
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  A novel method to address the association between received dose intensity and survival outcome: benefits of approaching treatment intensification at a more individualised level in a trial of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup.

Authors:  Carlo Lancia; Jakob K Anninga; Matthew R Sydes; Cristian Spitoni; Jeremy Whelan; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Hans Gelderblom; Marta Fiocco
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Association of relative dose intensity with BMI and pathologic complete response in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Ilana Usiskin; Fangyong Li; Melinda L Irwin; Brenda Cartmel; Tara Sanft
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  Ki-67 labeling index is a predictive marker for a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miaomiao Tao; Shu Chen; Xianquan Zhang; Qi Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Association of pre-chemotherapy peripheral blood pro-inflammatory and coagulation factors with reduced relative dose intensity in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Yuan Yuan; Nilesh Vora; Can-Lan Sun; Daneng Li; Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis; Joanne Mortimer; The-Hang Luu; George Somlo; James Waisman; David Smith; Joseph Chao; Vani Katheria; Timothy Synold; Vivi Tran; Shu Mi; Abrahm Levi; Anait Arsenyan; Jennifer Choi; Laura Zavala; Susan Yost; Arti Hurria
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Is PEGylated G-CSF superior to G-CSF in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Huan Zheng; Man-Cheng Yu; Wei Wang; Xin-Hong Wu; Dong-Mei Yang; Juan Xu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.