Literature DB >> 24190980

Predictive value of phase I trials for safety in later trials and final approved dose: analysis of 61 approved cancer drugs.

Denis L Jardim1, Kenneth R Hess, Patricia Lorusso, Razelle Kurzrock, David S Hong.   

Abstract

Phase I trials use a small number of patients to define a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the safety of new agents. We compared data from phase I and registration trials to determine whether early trials predicted later safety and final dose. We searched the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website for drugs approved in nonpediatric cancers (January 1990-October 2012). The recommended phase II dose (R2PD) and toxicities from phase I were compared with doses and safety in later trials. In 62 of 85 (73%) matched trials, the dose from the later trial was within 20% of the RP2D. In a multivariable analysis, phase I trials of targeted agents were less predictive of the final approved dose (OR, 0.2 for adopting ± 20% of the RP2D for targeted vs. other classes; P = 0.025). Of the 530 clinically relevant toxicities in later trials, 70% (n = 374) were described in phase I. A significant relationship (P = 0.0032) between increasing the number of patients in phase I (up to 60) and the ability to describe future clinically relevant toxicities was observed. Among 28,505 patients in later trials, the death rate that was related to drug was 1.41%. In conclusion, dosing based on phase I trials was associated with a low toxicity-related death rate in later trials. The ability to predict relevant toxicities correlates with the number of patients on the initial phase I trial. The final dose approved was within 20% of the RP2D in 73% of assessed trials. ©2013 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24190980     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  20 in total

1.  Impact of a Biomarker-Based Strategy on Oncology Drug Development: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials Leading to FDA Approval.

Authors:  Denis L Jardim; Denis L Fontes Jardim; Maria Schwaederle; Caimiao Wei; J Jack Lee; David S Hong; Alexander M Eggermont; Richard L Schilsky; John Mendelsohn; Vladimir Lazar; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Cumulative Toxicity in Targeted Therapies: What to Expect at the Recommended Phase II Dose.

Authors:  Maria-Athina Altzerinakou; Laurence Collette; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  The role of age on dose-limiting toxicities in phase I dose-escalation trials.

Authors:  A Schwandt; P J Harris; S Hunsberger; A Deleporte; G L Smith; D Vulih; B D Anderson; S P Ivy
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Race-, Age-, and Gender-Based Characteristics and Toxicities of Targeted Therapies on Phase I Trials.

Authors:  Taofeek K Owonikoko; Adeniyi K Busari; Sungjin Kim; Zhengjia Chen; Adebowale Akintayo; Colleen Lewis; Bradley C Carthon; Olatunji B Alese; Bassel F El-Rayes; Suresh S Ramalingam; R Donald Harvey
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.935

5.  Use of Expansion Cohorts in Phase I Trials and Probability of Success in Phase II for 381 Anticancer Drugs.

Authors:  Diogo D G Bugano; Kenneth Hess; Denis L F Jardim; Alona Zer; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Lillian L Siu; Albiruni R A Razak; David S Hong
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  A phase 1 safety study of veliparib combined with cisplatin and etoposide in extensive stage small cell lung cancer: A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E2511).

Authors:  Taofeek K Owonikoko; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Saad A Khan; David E Gerber; Jonathan Dowell; Rebecca A Moss; Chandra P Belani; Christine L Hann; Charu Aggarwal; Suresh S Ramalingam
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 5.705

7.  Assessment of adherence and relative dose intensity with oral chemotherapy in oncology clinical trials at an academic medical center.

Authors:  Jeff A Engle; Anne M Traynor; Toby C Campbell; Kari B Wisinski; Noelle LoConte; Glenn Liu; George Wilding; Jill M Kolesar
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 1.809

Review 8.  Analysis of Drug Development Paradigms for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Authors:  Denis L Jardim; Débora de Melo Gagliato; Francis J Giles; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Toxicity Attribution in Phase I Trials: Evaluating the Effect of Dose on the Frequency of Related and Unrelated Toxicities.

Authors:  Anne Eaton; Alexia Iasonos; Mrinal M Gounder; Erika G Pamer; Alexander Drilon; Diana Vulih; Gary L Smith; S Percy Ivy; David R Spriggs; David M Hyman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  Early phase clinical trials to identify optimal dosing and safety.

Authors:  Natalie Cook; Aaron R Hansen; Lillian L Siu; Albiruni R Abdul Razak
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 6.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.