Literature DB >> 28456898

Predictive Value of Early Skin Rash in Cetuximab-Based Therapy of Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer.

Gábor Rubovszky1, Barna Budai2, Erna Ganofszky3, Zsolt Horváth4, Éva Juhos3, Balázs Madaras3, Tünde Nagy3, Eszter Szabó3, Tamás Pintér3, Erika Tóth5, Péter Nagy2, István Láng3, Erika Hitre3.   

Abstract

Randomized trials in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) did not show benefit of cetuximab addition over chemotherapy. This is probably due to the lack of predictive biomarkers. The aim of this study was to explore possible predictive factors. Between 2009 and 2014, 57 patients were treated in 3-week cycles with cetuximab (250 mg/m2/week, loading dose: 400 mg/m2), gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8), and capecitabine (1300 mg/m2/day on days 1-14). The objective response rate (ORR), progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and the adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. An exploratory analysis was performed to find possible predictive factors on clinicopathological characteristics, routine laboratory parameters and early AEs, which occurred within 2 months from the beginning of treatment. The ORR was 21%. The median PFS and OS were 34 (95% CI: 24-40) and 54 (43-67) weeks, respectively. The most frequent AEs were skin toxicities. In univariate analysis performance status, previous stent implantation, thrombocyte count at the start of therapy, early neutropenia and skin rash statistically significantly influenced the ORR, PFS and/or OS. In multivariate Cox regression analysis only normal thrombocyte count at treatment start and early acneiform rash were independent markers of longer survival. In patients showing early skin rash compared to the others the median PFS was 39 vs. 13 weeks and the median OS was 67 vs. 26 weeks, respectively. It is suggested that early skin rash can be used as a biomarker to select patients who would benefit from the treatment with cetuximab plus chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acneiform rash; Cetuximab; Chemotherapy; Cholangiocarcinoma; Predictive marker

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28456898     DOI: 10.1007/s12253-017-0238-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res        ISSN: 1219-4956            Impact factor:   3.201


  31 in total

Review 1.  Dose density in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Marc L Citron
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.176

2.  Identification of active chemotherapy regimens in advanced biliary tract carcinoma: a review of chemotherapy trials in the past two decades.

Authors:  Susanna V Ulahannan; Osama E Rahma; Austin G Duffy; Oxana V Makarova-Rusher; Metin Kurtoglu; David J Liewehr; Seth M Steinberg; Tim F Greten
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2015-01-01

3.  Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Juan Valle; Harpreet Wasan; Daniel H Palmer; David Cunningham; Alan Anthoney; Anthony Maraveyas; Srinivasan Madhusudan; Tim Iveson; Sharon Hughes; Stephen P Pereira; Michael Roughton; John Bridgewater
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Synergistic Survival: A New Phenomenon Connected to Adverse Events of First-Line Sunitinib Treatment in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Krisztián Nagyiványi; Barna Budai; Krisztina Bíró; Fruzsina Gyergyay; László Noszek; Zsófia Küronya; Hajnalka Németh; Péter Nagy; Lajos Géczi
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.872

5.  Randomized Phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG1113, FUGA-BT).

Authors:  Junki Mizusawa; Chigusa Morizane; Takuji Okusaka; Hiroshi Katayama; Hiroshi Ishii; Haruhiko Fukuda; Junji Furuse
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  A Prognostic Index to Identify Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Who Could Benefit From Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin.

Authors:  Suk-Young Lee; Hye Sook Kim; Yoon Ji Choi; Kyong Hwa Park; Sang Won Shin; Yeul Hong Kim; Seung Tae Kim
Journal:  Am J Ther       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.688

7.  Prognostic significance of preoperative platelet count in patients with gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Rui-Tao Wang; Ling-Qiang Zhang; Yi-Ping Mu; Jian-Bo Li; Xin-Sen Xu; Qing Pang; Lian-Kang Sun; Xing Zhang; Shun-Bin Dong; Lin Wang; Chang Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  A KRAS mutation status-stratified randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin alone or in combination with cetuximab in advanced biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  J S Chen; C Hsu; N J Chiang; C S Tsai; H H Tsou; S F Huang; L Y Bai; I C Chang; H S Shiah; C L Ho; C J Yen; K D Lee; C F Chiu; K M Rau; M S Yu; Y Yang; R K Hsieh; J Y Chang; Y S Shan; Y Chao; L T Chen
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Hypertension as a biomarker of efficacy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib.

Authors:  Brian I Rini; Darrel P Cohen; Dongrui R Lu; Isan Chen; Subramanian Hariharan; Martin E Gore; Robert A Figlin; Michael S Baum; Robert J Motzer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  New and emerging treatment options for biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Marcus S Noel; Aram F Hezel
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  2 in total

1.  Early Skin Rash and Cetuximab-Based Therapy of Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer.

Authors:  Viroj Wiwanitkit
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Incidence, risk and prognostic role of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor-induced skin rash in biliary cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fangqiang Wei; Donghun Shin; Xiujun Cai
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 3.402

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.