Literature DB >> 15565814

Dose density in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Marc L Citron1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dose-dense chemotherapy increases the dose intensity of the regimen by delivering standard-dose chemotherapy with shorter intervals between the cycles. This article discusses the rationale for dose-dense therapy and reviews the results with dose-dense adjuvant regimens in recent clinical trials in breast cancer.
METHODS: The papers for this review covered evidence of a dose-response relation in cancer chemotherapy; the rationale for dose-intense (and specifically dose-dense) therapy; and clinical experience with dose-dense regimens in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, with particular attention to outcomes and toxicity.
RESULTS: Evidence supports maintaining the dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy within the conventional dose range. Disease-free and overall survival with combination cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil are significantly improved when patients receive within 85% of the planned dose. Moderate and high dose cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil within the standard range results in greater disease-free and overall survival than the low dose regimen. The sequential addition of paclitaxel after concurrent doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide also significantly improves survival. Disease-free and overall survival with dose-dense sequential or concurrent doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel with filgrastim (rhG-CSF; NEUPOGEN) support are significantly greater than with conventional schedules (q21d).
CONCLUSIONS: The delivered dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy within the standard dose range is an important predictor of the clinical outcome. Prospective trials of high-dose chemotherapy have shown no improvement over standard regimens, and toxicity was greater. Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy improves the clinical outcomes with doxorubicin-containing regimens. Filgrastim support enables the delivery of dose-dense chemotherapy and reduces the risk of neutropenia and its complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15565814     DOI: 10.1081/cnv-200027134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Invest        ISSN: 0735-7907            Impact factor:   2.176


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Treatment of breast cancer: from hormones to antibodies].

Authors:  J Eucker; A Emde; K Possinger
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Predictive Value of Early Skin Rash in Cetuximab-Based Therapy of Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer.

Authors:  Gábor Rubovszky; Barna Budai; Erna Ganofszky; Zsolt Horváth; Éva Juhos; Balázs Madaras; Tünde Nagy; Eszter Szabó; Tamás Pintér; Erika Tóth; Péter Nagy; István Láng; Erika Hitre
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Short-term and long-term prognostic value of histological response and intensified chemotherapy in osteosarcoma: a retrospective reanalysis of the BO06 trial.

Authors:  Eni Musta; Nan van Geloven; Jakob Anninga; Hans Gelderblom; Marta Fiocco
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 4.  The dark side of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor: a supportive therapy with potential to promote tumour progression.

Authors:  Belinda Yeo; Andrew D Redfern; Kellie A Mouchemore; John A Hamilton; Robin L Anderson
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 5.150

5.  Differential response of immunohistochemically defined breast cancer subtypes to anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy with or without paclitaxel.

Authors:  George Fountzilas; Urania Dafni; Mattheos Bobos; Anna Batistatou; Vassiliki Kotoula; Helen Trihia; Vassiliki Malamou-Mitsi; Spyros Miliaras; Sofia Chrisafi; Savvas Papadopoulos; Maria Sotiropoulou; Theodoros Filippidis; Helen Gogas; Triantafyllia Koletsa; Dimitrios Bafaloukos; Despina Televantou; Konstantine T Kalogeras; Dimitrios Pectasides; Dimosthenis V Skarlos; Angelos Koutras; Meletios A Dimopoulos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Method to measure the mismatch between target and achieved received dose intensity of chemotherapy in cancer trials: a retrospective analysis of the MRC BO06 trial in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Carlo Lancia; Jakob Anninga; Cristian Spitoni; Matthew R Sydes; Jeremy Whelan; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Hans Gelderblom; Marta Fiocco
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  A novel method to address the association between received dose intensity and survival outcome: benefits of approaching treatment intensification at a more individualised level in a trial of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup.

Authors:  Carlo Lancia; Jakob K Anninga; Matthew R Sydes; Cristian Spitoni; Jeremy Whelan; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Hans Gelderblom; Marta Fiocco
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  A pilot study: dose adaptation of capecitabine using mobile phone toxicity monitoring - supporting patients in their homes.

Authors:  Andrew Weaver; Sharon B Love; Mark Larsen; Milensu Shanyinde; Rachel Waters; Lisa Grainger; Vanessa Shearwood; Claire Brooks; Oliver Gibson; Annie M Young; Lionel Tarassenko
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.603

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.