Thomas P Cundy1, Hani J Marcus2, Archie Hughes-Hallett2, Azad S Najmaldin3, Guang-Zhong Yang4, Ara Darzi2. 1. The Hamlyn Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK; Department of Paediatric Surgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK. Electronic address: t.cundy@imperial.ac.uk. 2. The Hamlyn Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK. 3. Department of Paediatric Surgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK. 4. The Hamlyn Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Perceptions toward surgical innovations are critical to the social processes that drive technology adoption. This study aims to capture attitudes of early adopter pediatric surgeons toward robotic technologies in order to clarify 1) specific features that are driving appeal, 2) limiting factors that are acting as diffusion barriers, and 3) future needs. METHODS: Electronic surveys were distributed to pediatric surgeons with personal experience or exposure in robotic surgery. Participants were classified as experts or nonexperts for subgroup analysis. Coded Likert scale responses were analyzed using the Friedman or Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: A total of 48 responses were received (22 experts, 26 nonexperts), with 14 countries represented. The most highly rated benefits of robot assistance were wristed instruments, stereoscopic vision, and magnified view. The most highly rated limitations were capital outlay expense, instrument size, and consumables/maintenance expenses. Future technologies of greatest interest were microbots, image guidance, and flexible snake robots. CONCLUSIONS: Putative benefits and limitations of robotic surgery are perceived with widely varied weightings. Insight provided by these responses will inform relevant clinical, engineering, and industry groups such that unambiguous goals and priorities may be assigned for the future. Pediatric surgeons seem most receptive toward technology that is smaller, less expensive, more intelligent and flexible.
BACKGROUND: Perceptions toward surgical innovations are critical to the social processes that drive technology adoption. This study aims to capture attitudes of early adopter pediatric surgeons toward robotic technologies in order to clarify 1) specific features that are driving appeal, 2) limiting factors that are acting as diffusion barriers, and 3) future needs. METHODS: Electronic surveys were distributed to pediatric surgeons with personal experience or exposure in robotic surgery. Participants were classified as experts or nonexperts for subgroup analysis. Coded Likert scale responses were analyzed using the Friedman or Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: A total of 48 responses were received (22 experts, 26 nonexperts), with 14 countries represented. The most highly rated benefits of robot assistance were wristed instruments, stereoscopic vision, and magnified view. The most highly rated limitations were capital outlay expense, instrument size, and consumables/maintenance expenses. Future technologies of greatest interest were microbots, image guidance, and flexible snake robots. CONCLUSIONS: Putative benefits and limitations of robotic surgery are perceived with widely varied weightings. Insight provided by these responses will inform relevant clinical, engineering, and industry groups such that unambiguous goals and priorities may be assigned for the future. Pediatric surgeons seem most receptive toward technology that is smaller, less expensive, more intelligent and flexible.