Literature DB >> 28455321

Nonprocedural Symptomatic Infarction and In-Stent Restenosis After Intracranial Angioplasty and Stenting in the SAMMPRIS Trial (Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for the Prevention of Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis).

Colin P Derdeyn1, David Fiorella2, Michael J Lynn2, Tanya N Turan2, George A Cotsonis2, Bethany F Lane2, Jean Montgomery2, L Scott Janis2, Marc I Chimowitz2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency of symptomatic in-stent restenosis (ISR) and its contribution to nonprocedural symptomatic infarction in the SAMMPRIS trial (Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for the Prevention of Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis).
METHODS: Patients without a periprocedural primary end point were followed up to determine the occurrence of any of the following events: ischemic stroke, cerebral infarct with temporary signs, or transient ischemic attack in the territory of the stented artery. Vascular imaging performed after these events was reviewed for ISR. Annual rates for symptomatic ISR were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates.
RESULTS: Of 183 patients in the stenting group without a periprocedural primary end point, 27 (14.8%) had a symptomatic infarction (stroke or cerebral infarct with temporary signs) and 16 (8.7%) had transient ischemic attack alone in the territory during a median follow-up of 35.0 months. Of the 27 patients with infarctions, 17 (9.3%) had an ischemic stroke and 10 (5.5%) had a cerebral infarct with temporary signs alone. Adequate vascular imaging to evaluate ISR was available in 24 patients with infarctions (showing ISR in 16 [66.7%]) and in 10 patients with transient ischemic attack alone (showing ISR in 8 [80%]). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year rates (with 95% confidence limits) for symptomatic ISR in the SAMMPRIS stent cohort were 9.6% (6.1%-14.9%), 11.3% (7.5%-17.0%), and 14.0% (9.6%-20.2%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic ISR occurred in at least 1 of 7 patients in SAMMPRIS by 3 years of follow-up and was likely responsible for the majority of nonprocedural cerebral infarctions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00576693.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kaplan–Meier estimate; cerebral infarction; clinical trial; follow-up studies; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28455321      PMCID: PMC8204379          DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  20 in total

1.  [Intracranial angioplasty with wingspan stents for symptomatic atherosclerotic stenosis in small vessels:a study of long-term follow-up].

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Qing-Hai Huang; Yong-Wei Zhang; Jian-Min Liu; Bo Hong; Yi Xu; Wen-Yuan Zhao
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2010-12-21

2.  [Predictors of Wingspan in-stent restenosis for the treatment of symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis].

Authors:  Min-min Ma; Qin Yin; Ge-lin Xu; Ren-liang Zhang; Shuang-gen Zhu; Xin-ying Fan; Wu-sheng Zhu; Xin-feng Liu
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2011-05-24

3.  Endovascular treatment of symptomatic intracranial stenosis with the Wingspan stent system and Gateway PTA balloon: a multicenter series of 60 patients with acute and midterm results.

Authors:  Vincent Costalat; Igor Lima Maldonado; Jean-François Vendrell; Carlos Riquelme; Paolo Machi; Charles Arteaga; Francis Turjman; Hubert Desal; Jacques Sedat; Alain Bonafé
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Wingspan stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: clinical outcomes and risk factors for in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Yong Sam Shin; Byung Moon Kim; Sang Hyun Suh; Pyoung Jeon; Dong Joon Kim; Dong Ik Kim; Bum-Soo Kim; Keon Ha Kim; Ji Hoe Heo; Hyo Suk Nam; Young Dae Kim
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Impact of operator and site experience on outcomes after angioplasty and stenting in the SAMMPRIS trial.

Authors:  Colin P Derdeyn; David Fiorella; Michael J Lynn; Stanley L Barnwell; Osama O Zaidat; Philip M Meyers; Y Pierre Gobin; Jacques Dion; Bethany F Lane; Tanya N Turan; L Scott Janis; Marc I Chimowitz
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 5.836

6.  DynaCT evaluation of in-stent restenosis following Wingspan stenting of intracranial stenosis.

Authors:  S I Moskowitz; M E Kelly; J Haynes; D Fiorella
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.836

7.  Wingspan stents for the treatment of symptomatic atherosclerotic stenosis in small intracranial vessels: safety and efficacy evaluation.

Authors:  L Zhang; Q Huang; Y Zhang; J Liu; B Hong; Y Xu; W Zhao
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Influence of patient age and stenosis location on wingspan in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  A S Turk; E I Levy; F C Albuquerque; G L Pride; H Woo; B G Welch; D B Niemann; P D Purdy; B Aagaard-Kienitz; P A Rasmussen; L N Hopkins; T J Masaryk; C G McDougall; D Fiorella
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Colin P Derdeyn; Marc I Chimowitz; Michael J Lynn; David Fiorella; Tanya N Turan; L Scott Janis; Jean Montgomery; Azhar Nizam; Bethany F Lane; Helmi L Lutsep; Stanley L Barnwell; Michael F Waters; Brian L Hoh; J Maurice Hourihane; Elad I Levy; Andrei V Alexandrov; Mark R Harrigan; David Chiu; Richard P Klucznik; Joni M Clark; Cameron G McDougall; Mark D Johnson; G Lee Pride; John R Lynch; Osama O Zaidat; Zoran Rumboldt; Harry J Cloft
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Angioplasty and stenting of intracranial atherosclerosis with the Wingspan system: 1-year clinical and radiological outcome in a single Asian center.

Authors:  Simon Chun Ho Yu; Thomas Wai Hong Leung; Kwok Tung Lee; Lawrence Ka Sing Wong
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 5.836

View more
  12 in total

1.  Tandem Short-length Multi-stent Construct for Emergent Revascularization of Occlusive Long-segment Left Middle Cerebral Artery In-stent Stenosis.

Authors:  Torin W Karsonovich; Brittany R Bolt; Ajeet Gordhan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-04-15

2.  The Collar Sign in Pipeline Embolization Device-Treated Aneurysms.

Authors:  Christopher J Moran
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Comparison of Drug-Eluting Stent With Bare-Metal Stent in Patients With Symptomatic High-grade Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Baixue Jia; Xuelei Zhang; Ning Ma; Dapeng Mo; Feng Gao; Xuan Sun; Ligang Song; Lian Liu; Yiming Deng; Xiaotong Xu; Yong Zhang; Zengpin Liu; Sheng Guan; Fan Zhang; Bing Li; Hongbo Zheng; Xinfeng Liu; Yajie Liu; Kangning Chen; Jie Shuai; Jieqing Wan; Jun Wang; Xiangqun Shi; Tianxiao Li; Binge Chang; David S Liebeskind; Wengui Yu; Zhongrong Miao
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 18.302

4.  Influence of angioplasty and stenting on intracranial artery stenosis: preliminary results of high-resolution vessel wall imaging evaluation.

Authors:  Chia-Hung Wu; Chih-Ping Chung; Ting-Yi Chen; Kai-Wei Yu; Te-Ming Lin; Wei-An Tai; Chao-Bao Luo; Feng-Chi Chang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 7.034

5.  European Stroke Organisation guidelines on treatment of patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Marios Psychogios; Alex Brehm; Elena López-Cancio; Gian Marco De Marchis; Elena Meseguer; Aristeidis H Katsanos; Christine Kremer; Peter Sporns; Marialuisa Zedde; Adam Kobayashi; Jildaz Caroff; Daniel Bos; Sabrina Lémeret; Avtar Lal; Juan F Arenillas
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2022-06-03

6.  Factors Influencing the Outcome of Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis With Hemodynamic Impairment After Short and Long-Term Stent Placement.

Authors:  Wentao Gong; Xianjun Zhang; Zhen Meng; Feifei Liu; Guangwen Li; Juan Xiao; Peng Liu; Yujie Sun; Tonghui Liu; Hongxia Wang; Yong Zhang; Naidong Wang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Incidence and Risk Factors of In-Stent Restenosis for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  G Peng; Y Zhang; Z Miao
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Influence of Vertebrobasilar Stenotic Lesion Rigidity on the Outcome of Angioplasty and Stenting.

Authors:  Feng-Chi Chang; Chao-Bao Luo; Chih-Ping Chung; Kuei-Hong Kuo; Ting-Yi Chen; Han-Jui Lee; Chung-Jung Lin; Jiing-Feng Lirng; Wan-Yuo Guo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Endovascular Management of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: Lessons from Mistakes in the Past and how to Achieve Improved Outcomes.

Authors:  Hans Henkes; Pervinder Bhogal; Victoria Hellstern; Hansjörg Bäzner
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.649

10.  Intracranial Angioplasty with Enterprise Stent for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Single-Center Experience and a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bowen Sun; Chao Xu; Pei Wu; Man Li; Shancai Xu; Chunlei Wang; Xiangyu Liu; Yeping Ling; Huaizhang Shi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.