Literature DB >> 21740123

Endovascular treatment of symptomatic intracranial stenosis with the Wingspan stent system and Gateway PTA balloon: a multicenter series of 60 patients with acute and midterm results.

Vincent Costalat1, Igor Lima Maldonado, Jean-François Vendrell, Carlos Riquelme, Paolo Machi, Charles Arteaga, Francis Turjman, Hubert Desal, Jacques Sedat, Alain Bonafé.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The limitations of the medical management of symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis (SIAS) have encouraged the development of new strategies, such as endovascular treatment. In this study, the authors report and analyze a series of 63 endovascular procedures in which the Wingspan stent system was used.
METHODS: Data from 60 patients presenting with refractory SIAS, treated in 5 French neurointerventional centers between September 2006 and August 2009, were retrieved. An angiogram was systematically obtained 6 months after the procedure and yearly thereafter. The clinical neurological status was assessed and reported using the modified Rankin scale at 1-month, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up visits.
RESULTS: A total of 63 stenotic lesions was treated. The mean age of the patients was 65.3 years, and the mean diameter of the stenosis was 80.2%. Technical success was achieved in 95.2% of cases. The overall incidence of procedural complications was 20.6%, with a 4.8% rate of permanent postoperative morbidity and death. In-stent restenosis (ISR)/occlusion occurred in 11 cases (17.4%), of which 10 were asymptomatic and 9 were detected less than 1 year from the endovascular treatment. In 1 case, the patient presented with a recurrent transient ischemic attack and was treated again with angioplasty. The mean follow-up was 13.2 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment of SIAS demonstrates a moderate risk of neurological complication. Nevertheless, considering the critical natural history of severe refractory lesions, this may be considered the first alternative in cases of failed medical therapy. Technical failure, residual stenosis, or in-stent restenosis did not lead to systematic recurrent stroke in this series, which suggests the importance of plaque stabilization and neoendothelialization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21740123     DOI: 10.3171/2011.5.JNS101583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  15 in total

1.  Comment on: Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis : Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:993-1003.

Authors:  H Henkes; H Bäzner; P K Nelson
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.649

2.  Temporal correlation between wall shear stress and in-stent stenosis after Wingspan stent in swine model.

Authors:  M Fujimoto; H Takao; T Suzuki; Y Shobayashi; F Mayor; S Tateshima; M Yamamoto; Y Murayama; F Viñuela
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Evidence-based optimization of the management of intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Dale Ding; Robert M Starke
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Long-term Outcome of Angioplasty Using a Wingspan Stent, Post-Stent Balloon Dilation and Aggressive Restenosis Management for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis.

Authors:  Seong-Cheol Park; Su Hee Cho; Moon-Kyu Kim; Ji-Eun Kim; Woo-Young Jang; Moon-Kyu Lee; Kwang-Deog Jo; Seung-Hoon You
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  Symptom differences and pretreatment asymptomatic interval affect outcomes of stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  M D Alexander; P M Meyers; J D English; T R Stradford; S Sung; W S Smith; V V Halbach; R T Higashida; C F Dowd; D L Cooke; S W Hetts
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Nonprocedural Symptomatic Infarction and In-Stent Restenosis After Intracranial Angioplasty and Stenting in the SAMMPRIS Trial (Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for the Prevention of Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis).

Authors:  Colin P Derdeyn; David Fiorella; Michael J Lynn; Tanya N Turan; George A Cotsonis; Bethany F Lane; Jean Montgomery; L Scott Janis; Marc I Chimowitz
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 7.  The challenge of stroke prevention with intracranial arterial stenosis.

Authors:  Tanya N Turan; Alison Smock; Marc I Chimowitz
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Undersized angioplasty and stenting of symptomatic intracranial tight stenosis with Enterprise: Evaluation of clinical and vascular outcome.

Authors:  Kun-Yu Lee; David Yen-Ting Chen; Hui-Ling Hsu; Chi-Jen Chen; Ying-Chi Tseng
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 1.610

9.  Mechanism of procedural failure related to wingspan.

Authors:  Lin-Bo Zhao; Soonchan Park; Donggeun Lee; Deok Hee Lee; Dae Chul Suh
Journal:  Neurointervention       Date:  2012-08-17

10.  A Comparison of Safety and Effectiveness Between Wingspan and Neuroform Stents in Patients With Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Kai Zhou; Yuan Cao; Xiao-Hui He; Zhong-Ming Qiu; Shuai Liu; Zi-Li Gong; Jie Shuai; Qing-Wu Yang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.