Literature DB >> 28454281

Current status of the prognostic molecular biomarkers in breast cancer: A systematic review.

Goro Kutomi1, Toru Mizuguchi1, Fukino Satomi1, Hideki Maeda1, Hiroaki Shima1, Yasutoshi Kimura1, Koichi Hirata1.   

Abstract

Biomarkers that facilitate the prediction of breast cancer prognosis can improve the quality of life in patients during the long period of illness and treatment. Particularly in recent years, with the advent of a more exhaustive analysis of genetic information and gene products, the molecular mechanisms at play during breast cancer have gradually become clearer. In the present study, a systematic review of the literature between 2009 and 2014 was conducted by searching for the keywords 'breast cancer', 'biomarkers', 'diagnosis', 'prognosis' and 'drug response' to clarify the present state of knowledge regarding biomarkers. In the final analysis, 16 studies on biomarkers for the breast cancer prognosis were retrieved. From these, 7 biomarkers in 9 studies were found to be strongly reliable predictors of prognosis and a further 7 biomarkers in 7 studies were poorly reliable. The use of these prognostic biomarkers should increase the options available for treatment algorithms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; breast cancer; diagnosis; drug response; prognosis

Year:  2017        PMID: 28454281      PMCID: PMC5403394          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.5609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  66 in total

Review 1.  DNA methylation errors and cancer.

Authors:  P A Jones
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for ErbB-1- and/or ErbB-2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer: evidence from a phase III randomized trial.

Authors:  M J Ellis; A Coop; B Singh; L Mauriac; A Llombert-Cussac; F Jänicke; W R Miller; D B Evans; M Dugan; C Brady; E Quebe-Fehling; M Borgs
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  High expression of TIMP-1 in human breast cancer tissues is a predictive of resistance to paclitaxel-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Dongliang Zhu; Xiaoming Zha; Meiling Hu; Aidi Tao; Hangbo Zhou; Xiaojun Zhou; Yujie Sun
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Osteopontin expression and distribution in human carcinomas.

Authors:  L F Brown; A Papadopoulos-Sergiou; B Berse; E J Manseau; K Tognazzi; C A Perruzzi; H F Dvorak; D R Senger
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Increased expression of mitotic arrest deficient-like 1 (MAD1L1) is associated with poor prognosis and insensitive to Taxol treatment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Qian Sun; Xianyu Zhang; Tong Liu; Xiaolong Liu; Jingshu Geng; Xiaohui He; Yang Liu; Da Pang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Association of breast cancer DNA methylation profiles with hormone receptor status and response to tamoxifen.

Authors:  Martin Widschwendter; Kimberly D Siegmund; Hannes M Müller; Heidi Fiegl; Christian Marth; Elisabeth Müller-Holzner; Peter A Jones; Peter W Laird
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Cellular interactions in the vascular niche: implications in the regulation of tumor dormancy.

Authors:  Elena Favaro; Alberto Amadori; Stefano Indraccolo
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.205

Review 8.  Controversies of aromatase localization in human breast cancer--stromal versus parenchymal cells.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Miki; Takashi Suzuki; Hironobu Sasano
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.292

9.  Postdiagnosis C-reactive protein and breast cancer survivorship: findings from the WHEL study.

Authors:  Adriana Villaseñor; Shirley W Flatt; Catherine Marinac; Loki Natarajan; John P Pierce; Ruth E Patterson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Carcinogenesis of PIK3CA.

Authors:  Sidra German; Hafiz Muhammad Aslam; Shafaq Saleem; Aisha Raees; Tooba Anum; Arsalan Ahmad Alvi; Abdul Haseeb
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 2.857

View more
  9 in total

1.  Is there any relationship between adc values of diffusion-weighted imaging and the histopathological prognostic factors of invasive ductal carcinoma?

Authors:  Hale Aydin; Bahar Guner; Isil Esen Bostanci; Zarife Melda Bulut; Bilgin Kadri Aribas; Lutfi Dogan; Mehmet Ali Gulcelik
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Bioinformatic Investigation of Micro RNA-802 Target Genes, Protein Networks, and Its Potential Prognostic Value in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Maryam Eini; Sepideh Parsi; Mahmood Barati; Golnaz Bahramali; Marziyeh Alizadeh Zarei; Jafar Kiani; Assad Azarnezhad; Arshad Hosseini
Journal:  Avicenna J Med Biotechnol       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun

3.  Correlation Between Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Characteristics (Qualitative and Quantitative) and Pathological Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Irene Vraka; Evangelia Panourgias; Emmanouil Sifakis; Andreas Koureas; Petros Galanis; Dionysios Dellaportas; Athanasios Gouliamos; Aristides Antoniou
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  The Impact of lncRNA Dysregulation on Clinicopathology and Survival of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tian Tian; Meng Wang; Shuai Lin; Yan Guo; Zhiming Dai; Kang Liu; Pengtao Yang; Cong Dai; Yuyao Zhu; Yi Zheng; Peng Xu; Wenge Zhu; Zhijun Dai
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 8.886

5.  Quantitative Histopathology of Stained Tissues using Color Spatial Light Interference Microscopy (cSLIM).

Authors:  Hassaan Majeed; Adib Keikhosravi; Mikhail E Kandel; Tan H Nguyen; Yuming Liu; Andre Kajdacsy-Balla; Krishnarao Tangella; Kevin W Eliceiri; Gabriel Popescu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis and Treatment Modulation of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ioana Boca Bene; Sorin M Dudea; Anca I Ciurea
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-01-30

7.  The overexpression of DNA repair genes in invasive ductal and lobular breast carcinomas: Insights on individual variations and precision medicine.

Authors:  Ruwaa I Mohamed; Salma A Bargal; Asmaa S Mekawy; Iman El-Shiekh; Nurcan Tuncbag; Alaa S Ahmed; Eman Badr; Menattallah Elserafy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Rational Approach to Finding Genes Encoding Molecular Biomarkers: Focus on Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nathalie Schneider; Ellen Reed; Faddy Kamel; Enrico Ferrari; Mikhail Soloviev
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.141

9.  Discordance in ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 Expression Between Primary and Recurrent/Metastatic Lesions in Patients with Primary Early Stage Breast Cancer and the Clinical Significance: Retrospective Analysis of 75 Cases.

Authors:  Li Peng; Zhen Zhang; Dachun Zhao; Jialin Zhao; Feng Mao; Qiang Sun
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.201

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.