Literature DB >> 16846766

Metal artifact reduction in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging.

Craig A Harris1, Lawrence M White.   

Abstract

Many strategies can be employed to reduce the size and scale of metal susceptibility artifacts in the vicinity of orthopedic hardware; factors include selection of metal hardware material, patient positioning, and MRI sequence adjustments and techniques. The adjustments to sequence parameters include high spatial resolution fast spin echo sequences with minimal interecho spacing and increased receiver bandwidth. Frequency and phase encoding gradients can be orientated so misregistration artifacts arising from the metal are directed away from areas of anticipated clinical diagnostic interest. Complications arising in the vicinity of metallic hardware, including loosening, can be assessed after implication of these metal artifact reduction techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16846766     DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2006.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  16 in total

Review 1.  Peripheral nerve surgery: the role of high-resolution MR neurography.

Authors:  S K Thawait; K Wang; T K Subhawong; E H Williams; S S Hashemi; A J Machado; G K Thawait; T Soldatos; J A Carrino; A Chhabra
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Radiology of the resurfaced hip.

Authors:  Luthfur Rahman; Margaret Hall-Craggs; Sarah K Muirhead-Allwood
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  MRI evaluation of the knee with non-ferromagnetic external fixators: cadaveric knee model.

Authors:  Peter Elsissy; Yusuf T Akpolat; Alexander Chien; Wayne K Cheng
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-06-09

4.  Using the dGEMRIC technique to evaluate cartilage health in the presence of surgical hardware at 3T: comparison of inversion recovery and saturation recovery approaches.

Authors:  Agnes G d'Entremont; Shannon H Kolind; Burkhard Mädler; David R Wilson; Alexander L MacKay
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  MR imaging near metallic implants using MAVRIC SL: initial clinical experience at 3T.

Authors:  Luis B Gutierrez; Bao H Do; Garry E Gold; Brian A Hargreaves; Kevin M Koch; Pauline W Worters; Kathryn J Stevens
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Spinal fusion-hardware construct: Basic concepts and imaging review.

Authors:  Mohamed Ragab Nouh
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-28

7.  Metal-induced artifacts in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of a biodegradable magnesium alloy versus titanium and stainless steel controls.

Authors:  Lukas Filli; Roger Luechinger; Thomas Frauenfelder; Stefan Beck; Roman Guggenberger; Nadja Farshad-Amacker; Gustav Andreisek
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  Metal-related artifacts in instrumented spine. Techniques for reducing artifacts in CT and MRI: state of the art.

Authors:  P Stradiotti; A Curti; G Castellazzi; A Zerbi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Practical application of iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) imaging in minimizing metallic artifacts.

Authors:  Jang Gyu Cha; Hyun Sook Hong; Jai Soung Park; Sang Hyun Paik; Hae Kyung Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Metallic implant geometry and susceptibility estimation using multispectral B0 field maps.

Authors:  Xinwei Shi; Daehyun Yoon; Kevin M Koch; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.