Literature DB >> 28449859

The role of the intramedullary implant in limb lengthening.

Peter R Calder1, Maritz Laubscher2, W David Goodier3.   

Abstract

Limb lengthening is now an accepted practice in orthopaedic surgery. The principles of distraction osteogenesis have become well established with the use of external fixators, utilizing both monolateral and ring fixators. Corticotomy technique, frame stability, lengthening rate and rhythm all contribute to the formation of bone regenerate and tissues. Complications are however common including pin-site infection, soft tissue tethering from the pins and wires resulting in pain, regenerate deformity from soft tissue forces or fracture following frame removal and patient intolerance of the frames during treatment. Surgical techniques have changed to try and minimise these complications. The use of intramedullary nails have been used in conjunction with an external fixator or inserted after lengthening has been achieved, to reduce fixator time and prevent regenerate deformity. Implant innovation has led to the production of intramedullary lengthening nails. The initial devices used ratchet mechanisms with rotation of the bone fragments to achieve lengthening (Bliskunov, Albizzia and ISKD). More accurate control of lengthening and a reduction in pain, resulting from the manual rotation of the leg required to achieve the ratchet progression, was achieved by the use of a transcutaneous electrical conduit powered by external high frequency electrical energy (Fitbone). The most recent implant uses an external remote controller which contains two neodymium magnets. These are placed over the nail on the skin and rotate which in turn rotates a third magnet within the intramedullary nail (Precice). This magnet rotation is converted by a motor to extend or retract the extendible rod. There are multiple nail sizes and lengths available, and early results have shown accurate control with few complications. With such promising outcomes the use of this lengthening intramedullary nail is now recommended as the implant of choice in femoral lengthening. This article is an historical account of the intramedullary device and the impact on limb lengthening.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone transport; Corticotomy; Distraction osteogenesis; IM nailing; Intramedullary nail; Limb lengthening; Magnet; Precice lengthening nail

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28449859     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  18 in total

1.  Functional recovery of daily living and sports activities after cosmetic bilateral tibia lengthening.

Authors:  Kun-Bo Park; Yoon Hae Kwak; Jung Woo Lee; Byoung Kyu Park; Hoon Park; Dong Hoon Lee
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  External fixators: looking beyond the hardware maze.

Authors:  Kimia Khalatbari Kani; Jack A Porrino; Felix S Chew
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Pain levels during distraction osteogenesis with lengthening nails in 168 cases.

Authors:  Nikolaus Degen; N de Almeida Lopes; F Wolf; J Fürmetz; E Euler; W Böcker; P H Thaller
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-04-27

4.  Acute Femoral Lengthening in Adults Using Step-Cut Osteotomy, Traction Table, and Proximal Femoral Locking Plate Fixation: Surgical Technique and Report of Three Cases.

Authors:  Peter Brumat; Rene Mihalič; Simon Kovač; Rihard Trebše
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  What Are the Potential Benefits and Risks of Using Magnetically Driven Antegrade Intramedullary Lengthening Nails for Femoral Lengthening to Treat Leg Length Discrepancy?

Authors:  Adrien Frommer; Robert Roedl; Georg Gosheger; Maike Niemann; Dominik Turkowski; Gregor Toporowski; Christoph Theil; Andrea Laufer; Bjoern Vogt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  All Internal Bone Transport: Use of a Lengthening Nail and Double Plating for Management of Femoral Bone Loss.

Authors:  Jonathan Wright; Peter Bates; Nima Heidari; Alexandros Vris
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2019 May-Aug

Review 7.  [Research progress of intramedullary lengthening nail technology].

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Yonghong Zhang; Chaoqi Wang; Sihe Qin
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-05-15

8.  Thromboprophylaxis in Intramedullary Limb Lengthening Surgery.

Authors:  Alexios D Iliadis; Anna Timms; Sharron Fugazzotto; Penina Edel; Simon Britten; Jonathan Wright; David Goodier; Peter Calder
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2020 Sep-Dec

9.  A retrieval analysis of the Precice intramedullary limb lengthening system.

Authors:  V C Panagiotopoulou; K Davda; H S Hothi; J Henckel; A Cerquiglini; W D Goodier; J Skinner; A Hart; P R Calder
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  Treatment of segmental tibial defects by bone transport with circular external fixation and a locking plate.

Authors:  Yao Lu; Teng Ma; Cheng Ren; Zhong Li; Liang Sun; Hanzhong Xue; Ming Li; Kun Zhang; Congming Zhang; Qian Wang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.