J R Allegretti1, S Kearney2, N Li3, E Bogart3, K Bullock4, G K Gerber3, L Bry3, C B Clish4, E Alm2, J R Korzenik1. 1. Division of Gastroenterology, Crohn's and Colitis Center and Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. 3. Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The healthy microbiome protects against the development of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), which typically develops following antibiotics. The microbiome metabolises primary to secondary bile acids, a process if disrupted by antibiotics, may be critical for the initiation of CDI. AIM: To assess the levels of primary and secondary bile acids associated with CDI and associated microbial changes. METHODS: Stool and serum were collected from patients with (i) first CDI (fCDI), (ii) recurrent CDI (rCDI) and (iii) healthy controls. 16S rRNA sequencing and bile salt metabolomics were performed. Random forest regression models were constructed to predict disease status. PICRUSt analyses were used to test for associations between predicted bacterial bile salt hydrolase (BSH) gene abundances and bile acid levels. RESULTS: Sixty patients (20 fCDI, 19 rCDI and 21 controls) were enrolled. Secondary bile acids in stool were significantly elevated in controls compared to rCDI and fCDI (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0007 respectively). Primary bile acids in stool were significantly elevated in rCDI compared to controls (P < 0.0001) and in rCDI compared to fCDI (P = 0.02). Using random forest regression, we distinguished rCDI and fCDI patients 84.2% of the time using bile acid ratios. Stool deoxycholate to glycoursodeoxycholate ratio was the single best predictor. PICRUSt analyses found significant differences in predicted abundances of bacterial BSH genes in stool samples across the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Primary and secondary bile acid composition in stool was different in those with rCDI, fCDI and controls. The ratio of stool deoxycholate to glycoursodeoxycholate was the single best predictor of disease state and may be a potential biomarker for recurrence.
BACKGROUND: The healthy microbiome protects against the development of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), which typically develops following antibiotics. The microbiome metabolises primary to secondary bile acids, a process if disrupted by antibiotics, may be critical for the initiation of CDI. AIM: To assess the levels of primary and secondary bile acids associated with CDI and associated microbial changes. METHODS: Stool and serum were collected from patients with (i) first CDI (fCDI), (ii) recurrent CDI (rCDI) and (iii) healthy controls. 16S rRNA sequencing and bile salt metabolomics were performed. Random forest regression models were constructed to predict disease status. PICRUSt analyses were used to test for associations between predicted bacterial bile salt hydrolase (BSH) gene abundances and bile acid levels. RESULTS: Sixty patients (20 fCDI, 19 rCDI and 21 controls) were enrolled. Secondary bile acids in stool were significantly elevated in controls compared to rCDI and fCDI (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0007 respectively). Primary bile acids in stool were significantly elevated in rCDI compared to controls (P < 0.0001) and in rCDI compared to fCDI (P = 0.02). Using random forest regression, we distinguished rCDI and fCDIpatients 84.2% of the time using bile acid ratios. Stool deoxycholate to glycoursodeoxycholate ratio was the single best predictor. PICRUSt analyses found significant differences in predicted abundances of bacterial BSH genes in stool samples across the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Primary and secondary bile acid composition in stool was different in those with rCDI, fCDI and controls. The ratio of stool deoxycholate to glycoursodeoxycholate was the single best predictor of disease state and may be a potential biomarker for recurrence.
Authors: T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: D Richard Cutler; Thomas C Edwards; Karen H Beard; Adele Cutler; Kyle T Hess; Jacob Gibson; Joshua J Lawler Journal: Ecology Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 5.499
Authors: Alexa R Weingarden; Chi Chen; Aleh Bobr; Dan Yao; Yuwei Lu; Valerie M Nelson; Michael J Sadowsky; Alexander Khoruts Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: Charlie G Buffie; Vanni Bucci; Richard R Stein; Peter T McKenney; Lilan Ling; Asia Gobourne; Daniel No; Hui Liu; Melissa Kinnebrew; Agnes Viale; Eric Littmann; Marcel R M van den Brink; Robert R Jenq; Ying Taur; Chris Sander; Justin R Cross; Nora C Toussaint; Joao B Xavier; Eric G Pamer Journal: Nature Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Nicole D Pecora; Ning Li; Marc Allard; Cong Li; Esperanza Albano; Mary Delaney; Andrea Dubois; Andrew B Onderdonk; Lynn Bry Journal: MBio Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Jack A Gilbert; Robert A Quinn; Justine Debelius; Zhenjiang Z Xu; James Morton; Neha Garg; Janet K Jansson; Pieter C Dorrestein; Rob Knight Journal: Nature Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Michael Kriss; Keith Z Hazleton; Nichole M Nusbacher; Casey G Martin; Catherine A Lozupone Journal: Curr Opin Microbiol Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 7.934