Literature DB >> 28449620

Patients are willing to use telehealth for the multidisciplinary management of chronic musculoskeletal conditions: A cross-sectional survey.

Michelle A Cottrell1,2,3, Anne J Hill1,2, Shaun P O'Leary1,4,5, Maree E Raymer4,5, Trevor G Russell1,2.   

Abstract

Introduction Access to specialised multidisciplinary healthcare services is difficult for many patients with chronic musculoskeletal conditions. A possible solution could be delivery of care via telehealth. This study aims to identify current barriers in accessing healthcare services, and to determine if telehealth is an acceptable mode of healthcare delivery, from the perspective of patients with chronic musculoskeletal conditions. Methods Surveys were distributed to current patients receiving care within the Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Physiotherapy Screening Clinic and Multidisciplinary Service (N/OPSC & MDS) at six facilities throughout Queensland, Australia. The 48-item survey evaluated five key areas including demographics; current barriers to attendance; satisfaction with current management provided by the N/OPSC & MDS; technology access and literacy; and attitudes and preference towards telehealth. Results In total, 85 patients (71%) completed the survey. The majority of patients were satisfied overall with the N/OPSC & MDS, but almost one-quarter of the patients reported ceasing treatment due to difficulty accessing services. Over half of the respondents were willing to use telehealth if it reduced the costs (53%) and time (57%) associated with attending appointments. Patients in paid employment were more likely (65%) to use telehealth if it reduced work absenteeism. Overall, 78% of patients were identified as having appropriate technology access to enable home telehealth. Specifically, 43% of patients would prefer home telehealth over having to travel to attend their appointments. Discussion The majority of N/OPSC & MDS patients are willing to engage in telehealth for the management of their chronic musculoskeletal condition. These findings justify consideration of telehealth as an additional method of service delivery within the existing N/OPSC & MD service.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Telehealth; engagement; musculoskeletal; orthopaedic; patient

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28449620     DOI: 10.1177/1357633X17706605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.184


  12 in total

Review 1.  [Remote management of musculoskeletal pain : A pragmatic approach to the implementation of video and phone consultations in musculoskeletal practice. German version].

Authors:  David Hohenschurz-Schmidt; Whitney Scott; Charlie Park; Georgios Christopoulos; Steven Vogel; Jerry Draper-Rodi
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 1.629

Review 2.  Influence of Connected Health Interventions for Adherence to Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Dahbia Agher; Karima Sedki; Rosy Tsopra; Sylvie Despres; Marie-Christine Jaulent
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Remote management of musculoskeletal pain: a pragmatic approach to the implementation of video and phone consultations in musculoskeletal practice.

Authors:  David Hohenschurz-Schmidt; Whitney Scott; Charlie Park; Georgios Christopoulos; Steven Vogel; Jerry Draper-Rodi
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2020-12-15

4.  Home-Based vs Supervised Inpatient and/or Outpatient Rehabilitation Following Knee Meniscectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sebastiano Nutarelli; Eamonn Delahunt; Marco Cuzzolin; Marco Delcogliano; Christian Candrian; Giuseppe Filardo
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-05-03

5.  Does Telerehabilitation Help in Reducing Disability among People with Musculoskeletal Conditions? A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Hana Alsobayel; Faris Alodaibi; Ali Albarrati; Norah Alsalamah; Fadwa Alhawas; Ahmed Alhowimel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Understanding digital health ecosystem from Australian citizens' perspective: A scoping review.

Authors:  Abraham Oshni Alvandi; Chris Bain; Frada Burstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Available tools to evaluate digital health literacy and engagement with eHealth resources: A scoping review.

Authors:  Alice Faux-Nightingale; Fraser Philp; Darren Chadwick; Baldev Singh; Anand Pandyan
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-08-23

8.  Patient and Provider Satisfaction With Pediatric Urology Telemedicine Clinic.

Authors:  Sandra Chrapah; Mirna Becevic; Karla T Washington; Lincoln R Sheets; Emmanuelle Wallach; Rebecca Chitima; Elizabeth Malm-Buatsi
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2021-01-13

9.  Effectiveness of telephone-based interventions for managing osteoarthritis and spinal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kate M O'Brien; Rebecca K Hodder; John Wiggers; Amanda Williams; Elizabeth Campbell; Luke Wolfenden; Sze Lin Yoong; Flora Tzelepis; Steven J Kamper; Christopher M Williams
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Technology versus tradition: a non-inferiority trial comparing video to face-to-face consultations with a physiotherapist for people with knee osteoarthritis. Protocol for the PEAK randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rana S Hinman; Alexander J Kimp; Penny K Campbell; Trevor Russell; Nadine E Foster; Jessica Kasza; Anthony Harris; Kim L Bennell
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.