Literature DB >> 26789208

Choosing the Optimal Number of Factors in Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Model Selection Perspective.

Kristopher J Preacher1, Guangjian Zhang2, Cheongtag Kim3, Gerhard Mels4.   

Abstract

A central problem in the application of exploratory factor analysis is deciding how many factors to retain (m). Although this is inherently a model selection problem, a model selection perspective is rarely adopted for this task. We suggest that Cudeck and Henly's (1991) framework can be applied to guide the selection process. Researchers must first identify the analytic goal: identifying the (approximately) correct m or identifying the most replicable m. Second, researchers must choose fit indices that are most congruent with their goal. Consistent with theory, a simulation study showed that different fit indices are best suited to different goals. Moreover, model selection with one goal in mind (e.g., identifying the approximately correct m) will not necessarily lead to the same number of factors as model selection with the other goal in mind (e.g., identifying the most replicable m). We recommend that researchers more thoroughly consider what they mean by "the right number of factors" before they choose fit indices.

Year:  2013        PMID: 26789208     DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2012.710386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  48 in total

1.  PERSONAL VULNERABILITIES AND ASSORTATIVE MATE SELECTION AMONG NEWLYWED SPOUSES.

Authors:  Joseph M Trombello; Dominik Schoebi; Thomas N Bradbury
Journal:  J Soc Clin Psychol       Date:  2015-06

2.  Parenting and Preschooler TV Viewing in Low-Income Mexican Americans: Development of the Parenting Practices Regarding TV Viewing (PPRTV) Scale.

Authors:  Darcy A Thompson; Susan L Johnson; Elizabeth A Vandewater; Sarah J Schmiege; Richard E Boles; Jerusha Lev; Jeanne M Tschann
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.225

3.  The structure of adult ADHD.

Authors:  Lenard A Adler; Stephen V Faraone; Thomas J Spencer; Patricia Berglund; Samuel Alperin; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  Type I and Type II Error Rates and Overall Accuracy of the Revised Parallel Analysis Method for Determining the Number of Factors.

Authors:  Samuel B Green; Marilyn S Thompson; Roy Levy; Wen-Juo Lo
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 2.821

5.  Nursing home adjustment scale: a psychometric study of an English version.

Authors:  Ga Eon Lee; Ju Young Yoon; Barbara J Bowers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Asymptotics of AIC, BIC, and RMSEA for Model Selection in Structural Equation Modeling.

Authors:  Po-Hsien Huang
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Development of an Instrument to Measure Pharmacy Student Attitudes Toward Social Media Professionalism.

Authors:  Marie A Chisholm-Burns; Christina A Spivey; Melanie C Jaeger; Jennifer Williams; Christa George
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Factor Structure of the Cultural Competence Items in the National Home and Hospice Care Survey.

Authors:  Azza AbuDagga; Constance A Mara; Adam C Carle; Robert Weech-Maldonado
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Beliefs About Child TV Viewing in Low-Income Mexican American Parents of Preschoolers: Development of the Beliefs About Child TV Viewing Scale (B-TV).

Authors:  Darcy A Thompson; Susan L Johnson; Sarah J Schmiege; Elizabeth A Vandewater; Richard E Boles; Jerusha Lev; Jeanne M Tschann
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-06

10.  A Factor Analysis Approach for Clustering Patient Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Jung Hun Oh; Maria Thor; Caroline Olsson; Viktor Skokic; Rebecka Jörnsten; David Alsadius; Niclas Pettersson; Gunnar Steineck; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.