Artjoms Spaks1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical and translational research on lung cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment can provide valuable scientific data and unique opportunity to study tumor microenvironment. CXC chemokines, which are members of a big family of cytokines, are undoubtedly involved in tumor growth regulation and metastasizing pathways. For better understanding of CXC chemokine involvement in the process of carcinogenesis we have studied the cohort of early stage non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing surgery with curative intent. Our aim was to assess CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL) levels in patient blood samples representing systemic circulation and tumor microenvironment; assess CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR) expression in tumor tissue; and measure tumor infiltrating immune cell subpopulations. METHODS: A total of 54 patients with NSCLC had radical lung resection were enrolled in a single center prospective study and were followed-up annually for up to six years. During surgical procedure peripheral and tumor draining blood samples were taken. CXCL1, CXCL4, CXCL5, CXCL6, CXCL7, CXCL8, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11 and CXCL12 levels were determined by ELISA, and chemokine concentration gradient was calculated. Tumor infiltrating immune cells (T helper cells, T cytotoxic cells, macrophages, B cells, plasma cells) and expression of CXCR1, CXCR2, CXCR3 and CXCR4 in tumor tissue were assessed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Statistically significant decrease in chemokine concentration was found for CXCL4 (P=0.002) and CXCL5 (P=0.011), and statistically significant concentration increase was found for CXCL7 (P=0.001) in total cohort. We have found statistically significant CXC chemokine concentration change for majority of chemokines-CXCL1 (P=0.002), CXCL4 (P=0.001), CXCL5 (P=0.013), CXCL7 (P=0.036), CXCL8 (P=0.026), CXCL9 (P=0.034) and CXCL10 (P=0.032) in a group of patients who had good clinical result after surgery with no evidence of relapse, on the other hand patients with cancer recurrence including local and systemic cancer spread did not show any change of chemokine concentration in blood except for CXCL1 (P=0.041). We have also found that chemokine levels and gradients correlate with CXC receptor expression and number of tumor infiltrating immune cell subpopulations. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of tumor microcirculation is useful for evaluation of different types of circulating biomarkers and application of our method can be very wide, integrating thoracic surgeons into translational cancer research.
BACKGROUND: Clinical and translational research on lung cancerpatients undergoing surgical treatment can provide valuable scientific data and unique opportunity to study tumor microenvironment. CXC chemokines, which are members of a big family of cytokines, are undoubtedly involved in tumor growth regulation and metastasizing pathways. For better understanding of CXC chemokine involvement in the process of carcinogenesis we have studied the cohort of early stage non-small cell lung cancerpatients undergoing surgery with curative intent. Our aim was to assess CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL) levels in patient blood samples representing systemic circulation and tumor microenvironment; assess CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR) expression in tumor tissue; and measure tumor infiltrating immune cell subpopulations. METHODS: A total of 54 patients with NSCLC had radical lung resection were enrolled in a single center prospective study and were followed-up annually for up to six years. During surgical procedure peripheral and tumor draining blood samples were taken. CXCL1, CXCL4, CXCL5, CXCL6, CXCL7, CXCL8, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11 and CXCL12 levels were determined by ELISA, and chemokine concentration gradient was calculated. Tumor infiltrating immune cells (T helper cells, T cytotoxic cells, macrophages, B cells, plasma cells) and expression of CXCR1, CXCR2, CXCR3 and CXCR4 in tumor tissue were assessed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Statistically significant decrease in chemokine concentration was found for CXCL4 (P=0.002) and CXCL5 (P=0.011), and statistically significant concentration increase was found for CXCL7 (P=0.001) in total cohort. We have found statistically significant CXC chemokine concentration change for majority of chemokines-CXCL1 (P=0.002), CXCL4 (P=0.001), CXCL5 (P=0.013), CXCL7 (P=0.036), CXCL8 (P=0.026), CXCL9 (P=0.034) and CXCL10 (P=0.032) in a group of patients who had good clinical result after surgery with no evidence of relapse, on the other hand patients with cancer recurrence including local and systemic cancer spread did not show any change of chemokine concentration in blood except for CXCL1 (P=0.041). We have also found that chemokine levels and gradients correlate with CXC receptor expression and number of tumor infiltrating immune cell subpopulations. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of tumor microcirculation is useful for evaluation of different types of circulating biomarkers and application of our method can be very wide, integrating thoracic surgeons into translational cancer research.
Entities:
Keywords:
CXC chemokines; cancer biomarkers; immune cell infiltrate; lung cancer
Authors: R M Strieter; P J Polverini; S L Kunkel; D A Arenberg; M D Burdick; J Kasper; J Dzuiba; J Van Damme; A Walz; D Marriott Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1995-11-10 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Daniel Rinewalt; David D Shersher; Shaun Daly; Cristina Fhied; Sanjib Basu; Brett Mahon; Edward Hong; Gary Chmielewski; Michael J Liptay; Jeffrey A Borgia Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: A Müller; B Homey; H Soto; N Ge; D Catron; M E Buchanan; T McClanahan; E Murphy; W Yuan; S N Wagner; J L Barrera; A Mohar; E Verástegui; A Zlotnik Journal: Nature Date: 2001-03-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Ash A Alizadeh; Victoria Aranda; Alberto Bardelli; Cedric Blanpain; Christoph Bock; Christine Borowski; Carlos Caldas; Andrea Califano; Michael Doherty; Markus Elsner; Manel Esteller; Rebecca Fitzgerald; Jan O Korbel; Peter Lichter; Christopher E Mason; Nicholas Navin; Dana Pe'er; Kornelia Polyak; Charles W M Roberts; Lillian Siu; Alexandra Snyder; Hannah Stower; Charles Swanton; Roel G W Verhaak; Jean C Zenklusen; Johannes Zuber; Jessica Zucman-Rossi Journal: Nat Med Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Jeffrey A Borgia; Sanjib Basu; L Penfield Faber; Anthony W Kim; John S Coon; Kelly A Kaiser-Walters; Cristina Fhied; Sherene Thomas; Omid Rouhi; William H Warren; Philip Bonomi; Michael J Liptay Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Sophie Seang; Anoma Somasunderam; Maitreyee Nigalye; Ma Somsouk; Timoty W Schacker; Joyce L Sanchez; Peter W Hunt; Netanya S Utay; Jordan E Lake Journal: Pathog Immun Date: 2017-06-21
Authors: Mateusz Wierdak; Marcin Surmiak; Katarzyna Milian-Ciesielska; Mateusz Rubinkiewicz; Anna Rzepa; Michał Wysocki; Piotr Major; Stanisław Kłęk; Michał Pędziwiatr Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 6.639