Literature DB >> 28446618

The role of feeding morphology and competition in governing the diet breadth of sympatric stomatopod crustaceans.

Maya S deVries1.   

Abstract

Competition for food drives divergence and specialization in feeding morphology. Stomatopod crustaceans have two kinds of highly specialized feeding appendages: either elongate spear-like appendages (spearers) used to ambush soft-bodied evasive prey or hammer-like appendages (smashers) that produce extremely high forces used both to break hard-shelled prey and to capture evasive prey. To evaluate associations between appendage type and feeding ecology, the diet of two small smasher and spearer species (size range: 21-27 mm) that co-occur were compared. Stable isotope analysis and the Bayesian mixing model MixSIAR were used to estimate the proportional contributions of prey types to the diet. Both species had relatively wide diets that included hard-shelled and soft-bodied prey, albeit in different proportions; the smasher consumed a greater proportion of hard-shelled prey, and the spearer consumed mostly soft-bodied prey. Appendage kinematics in stomatopods is known to scale linearly across species. These two small species may produce similar kinematics allowing them both to capture evasive prey and hammer hard-shelled prey, thereby widening their diets. Yet, the spearer species is more highly adept at capturing evasive prey, indicating that small spearers are stronger competitors for soft-bodied prey. These findings suggest that a smasher's ability to access hard prey reduced competition for soft prey, and therefore conferred an important benefit favouring the evolution of the impressive smashing strike.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Keywords:  mantis shrimp; stable isotopes; trophic ecology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28446618      PMCID: PMC5414697          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  6 in total

1.  The role of feeding morphology and competition in governing the diet breadth of sympatric stomatopod crustaceans.

Authors:  Maya S deVries
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Comparative spring mechanics in mantis shrimp.

Authors:  S N Patek; M V Rosario; J R A Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Biomechanics: deadly strike mechanism of a mantis shrimp.

Authors:  S N Patek; W L Korff; R L Caldwell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Strike mechanics of an ambush predator: the spearing mantis shrimp.

Authors:  M S deVries; E A K Murphy; S N Patek
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Specialized morphology corresponds to a generalist diet: linking form and function in smashing mantis shrimp crustaceans.

Authors:  Maya S deVries; Brian C Stock; John H Christy; Gregory R Goldsmith; Todd E Dawson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Isotopic incorporation rates and discrimination factors in mantis shrimp crustaceans.

Authors:  Maya S deVries; Carlos Martínez Del Rio; Tate S Tunstall; Todd E Dawson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  The role of feeding morphology and competition in governing the diet breadth of sympatric stomatopod crustaceans.

Authors:  Maya S deVries
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  From top to bottom: Do Lake Trout diversify along a depth gradient in Great Bear Lake, NT, Canada?

Authors:  Louise Chavarie; Kimberly L Howland; Les N Harris; Michael J Hansen; William J Harford; Colin P Gallagher; Shauna M Baillie; Brendan Malley; William M Tonn; Andrew M Muir; Charles C Krueger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.