Literature DB >> 22032740

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary sensory cortex on somatosensory perception.

Lisa Grundmann1, Roman Rolke, Michael A Nitsche, Goran Pavlakovic, Svenja Happe, Rolf-Detlef Treede, Walter Paulus, Cornelius G Bachmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is able to modify cortical excitability and activity in humans.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to analyze the effects of tDCS of the primary sensory cortex (SI) on thermal and mechanical perception, assessed by quantitative sensory testing (QST).
METHODS: The comprehensive QST protocol encompassing thermal and mechanical detection and pain thresholds as devised by the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS) was applied to skin areas innervated by the radial and median nerve of 12 healthy subjects, who were examined before and after each tDCS stimulation type. Anodal, cathodal, and sham tDCS was applied at a 1 mA current intensity with the active electrode placed over the left primary sensory cortex (SI) and the reference electrode above the right orbit for 15 minutes.
RESULTS: After cathodal tDCS cold detection threshold (CDT) significantly increased in the contralateral (P < .01) and ipsilateral hand (P < .05) as compared to baseline condition and sham stimulation, after cathodal stimulation significantly increased warm detection threshold (WDT) was observed in the contralateral hand when compared with the baseline condition (P < .05) but not with sham stimulation. Thermal pain as well as mechanical detection and pain thresholds remained unaltered.
CONCLUSIONS: Cathodal tDCS of the primary sensory cortex significantly reduced the sensitivity to Aδ-fiber-mediated cold sensation, C-fiber-mediated warm sensation was reduced only compared with baseline, whereas Aß-fiber-mediated somatosensory inputs were less affected. Our results correspond with our previous observations of primary motor cortex tDCS effects on QST parameters.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22032740     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2010.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  24 in total

1.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of primary somatosensory cortex on vibrotactile detection and discrimination.

Authors:  Sara Labbé; El-Mehdi Meftah; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Therapeutic Tool for Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Camila Bonin Pinto; Beatriz Teixeira Costa; Dante Duarte; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.635

3.  Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates offline visual oscillatory activity: A magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Timothy J McDermott; Mackenzie S Mills; Nathan M Coolidge; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Human primary somatosensory cortex is differentially involved in vibrotaction and nociception.

Authors:  Cédric Lenoir; Gan Huang; Yves Vandermeeren; Samar Marie Hatem; André Mouraux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effective for chronic low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Alwardat; Antonio Pisani; Mohammad Etoom; Roberta Carpenedo; Elisabetta Chinè; Mario Dauri; Francesca Leonardis; Silvia Natoli
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by high-speed cooling of the skin: A robust and non-painful method to assess the spinothalamic system in humans.

Authors:  Roxane De Keyser; Emanuel N van den Broeke; Arthur Courtin; André Dufour; André Mouraux
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Regulatory Considerations for the Clinical and Research Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): review and recommendations from an expert panel.

Authors:  F Fregni; M A Nitsche; C K Loo; A R Brunoni; P Marangolo; J Leite; S Carvalho; N Bolognini; W Caumo; N J Paik; M Simis; K Ueda; H Ekhitari; P Luu; D M Tucker; W J Tyler; J Brunelin; A Datta; C H Juan; G Venkatasubramanian; P S Boggio; M Bikson
Journal:  Clin Res Regul Aff       Date:  2015-03-01

Review 8.  [Transcranial direct current stimulation for depressive disorders].

Authors:  S Aust; U Palm; F Padberg; M Bajbouj
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.214

9.  Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Virtual Reality-Based Paradigm for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Individuals with Restricted Movements. A Feasibility Study with a Chronic Stroke Survivor with Severe Hemiparesis.

Authors:  María Antonia Fuentes; Adrián Borrego; Jorge Latorre; Carolina Colomer; Mariano Alcañiz; María José Sánchez-Ledesma; Enrique Noé; Roberto Llorens
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  How does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the pain neuromatrix affect brain excitability and pain perception? A randomised, double-blind, sham-control study.

Authors:  Bita Vaseghi; Maryam Zoghi; Shapour Jaberzadeh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.