Tamara L Lotan1,2,3, Harsimar B Kaur1, Abdullah M Alharbi1, Colin C Pritchard4, Jonathan I Epstein1,2,3. 1. Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: Prostatic adenocarcinomas with focal pleomorphic giant-cell features constitute a rare tumour subtype with abysmal clinical outcomes. More than one-third of patients with this histology die within a year of the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer. We aimed to perform molecular profiling of these tumors to identify potential therapeutic targets. METHODS AND RESULTS: Here, we performed next-generation sequencing with a highly validated targeted panel (UW-OncoPlex) on somatic tumour DNA extracted from eight cases of prostatic adenocarcinoma with focal pleomorphic giant-cell features, including cases with and without prior treatment for prostate cancer. We found that DNA damage repair mutations are common in this rare subset of prostate tumours, with two of eight having bi-allelic pathogenic mutations in homologous DNA repair genes (including BRCA2 and NBN) and two of eight having bi-allelic pathogenic mutations in mismatch repair genes (including MSH2 and MLH1). CONCLUSION: These data are consistent with emerging data showing that DNA repair alterations are enriched among castration-resistant prostate cancer and aggressive subsets of primary tumours. Given that these patients are potential candidates for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor and/or immune checkpoint blockade, and have a poor prognosis with standard therapy, we recommend that tumour and germline DNA sequencing with or without mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry be considered for all prostatic adenocarcinomas with focal pleomorphic giant-cell features.
AIMS: Prostatic adenocarcinomas with focal pleomorphic giant-cell features constitute a rare tumour subtype with abysmal clinical outcomes. More than one-third of patients with this histology die within a year of the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer. We aimed to perform molecular profiling of these tumors to identify potential therapeutic targets. METHODS AND RESULTS: Here, we performed next-generation sequencing with a highly validated targeted panel (UW-OncoPlex) on somatic tumour DNA extracted from eight cases of prostatic adenocarcinoma with focal pleomorphic giant-cell features, including cases with and without prior treatment for prostate cancer. We found that DNA damage repair mutations are common in this rare subset of prostate tumours, with two of eight having bi-allelic pathogenic mutations in homologous DNA repair genes (including BRCA2 and NBN) and two of eight having bi-allelic pathogenic mutations in mismatch repair genes (including MSH2 and MLH1). CONCLUSION: These data are consistent with emerging data showing that DNA repair alterations are enriched among castration-resistant prostate cancer and aggressive subsets of primary tumours. Given that these patients are potential candidates for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor and/or immune checkpoint blockade, and have a poor prognosis with standard therapy, we recommend that tumour and germline DNA sequencing with or without mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry be considered for all prostatic adenocarcinomas with focal pleomorphic giant-cell features.
Authors: Gail P Risbridger; Renea A Taylor; David Clouston; Ania Sliwinski; Heather Thorne; Sally Hunter; Jason Li; Gillian Mitchell; Declan Murphy; Mark Frydenberg; David Pook; John Pedersen; Roxanne Toivanen; Hong Wang; Melissa Papargiris; Mitchell G Lawrence; Damien M Bolton Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-08-22 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Scott A Tomlins; Daniel R Rhodes; Sven Perner; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Rohit Mehra; Xiao-Wei Sun; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Xuhong Cao; Joelle Tchinda; Rainer Kuefer; Charles Lee; James E Montie; Rajal B Shah; Kenneth J Pienta; Mark A Rubin; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: Science Date: 2005-10-28 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Stephen J Salipante; Sheena M Scroggins; Heather L Hampel; Emily H Turner; Colin C Pritchard Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Samson W Fine; Anuradha Gopalan; Margaret A Leversha; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Satish K Tickoo; Qin Zhou; Jaya M Satagopan; Peter T Scardino; William L Gerald; Victor E Reuter Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Jonathan I Epstein; Mahul B Amin; Himisha Beltran; Tamara L Lotan; Juan-Miguel Mosquera; Victor E Reuter; Brian D Robinson; Patricia Troncoso; Mark A Rubin Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Colin C Pritchard; Stephen J Salipante; Karen Koehler; Christina Smith; Sheena Scroggins; Brent Wood; David Wu; Ming K Lee; Suzanne Dintzis; Andrew Adey; Yajuan Liu; Keith D Eaton; Renato Martins; Kari Stricker; Kim A Margolin; Noah Hoffman; Jane E Churpek; Jonathan F Tait; Mary-Claire King; Tom Walsh Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2013-11-02 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Colin C Pritchard; Colm Morrissey; Akash Kumar; Xiaotun Zhang; Christina Smith; Ilsa Coleman; Stephen J Salipante; Jennifer Milbank; Ming Yu; William M Grady; Jonathan F Tait; Eva Corey; Robert L Vessella; Tom Walsh; Jay Shendure; Peter S Nelson Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Elena Castro; Chee Goh; David Olmos; Ed Saunders; Daniel Leongamornlert; Malgorzata Tymrakiewicz; Nadiya Mahmud; Tokhir Dadaev; Koveela Govindasami; Michelle Guy; Emma Sawyer; Rosemary Wilkinson; Audrey Ardern-Jones; Steve Ellis; Debra Frost; Susan Peock; D Gareth Evans; Marc Tischkowitz; Trevor Cole; Rosemarie Davidson; Diana Eccles; Carole Brewer; Fiona Douglas; Mary E Porteous; Alan Donaldson; Huw Dorkins; Louise Izatt; Jackie Cook; Shirley Hodgson; M John Kennedy; Lucy E Side; Jacqueline Eason; Alex Murray; Antonis C Antoniou; Douglas F Easton; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Rosalind Eeles Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-04-08 Impact factor: 44.544