Background: Public health concerns with regard to both low and high folate status exist in the United States. Recent publications have questioned the utility of self-reported dietary intake data in research and monitoring. Objectives: The purpose of this analysis was to examine the relation between self-reported folate intakes and folate status biomarkers and to evaluate their usefulness for several types of applications.Design: We examined usual dietary intakes of folate by using the National Cancer Institute method to adjust two 24-h dietary recalls (including dietary supplements) for within-person variation and then compared these intakes with serum and red blood cell (RBC) folate among 4878 men and nonpregnant, nonlactating women aged ≥19 y in NHANES 2011-2012, a nationally representative, cross-sectional survey, with respect to consistency across prevalence estimates and rank order comparisons. Results: There was a very low prevalence (<1%) of folate deficiency when serum (<7 nmol/L) and RBC (<305 nmol/L) folate were considered, whereas a higher proportion of the population reported inadequate total dietary folate intakes (6%). Similar patterns of change occurred between intakes and biomarkers of folate status when distributions were examined (i.e., dose response), particularly when diet was expressed in μg. Intakes greater than the Tolerable Upper Intake Level greatly increased the odds of having high serum folate (OR: 17.6; 95% CI: 5.5, 56.0).Conclusions: When assessing folate status in the United States, where fortification and supplement use are common, similar patterns in the distributions of diet and biomarkers suggest that these 2 types of status indicators reflect the same underlying folate status; however, the higher prevalence estimates for inadequate intakes compared with biomarkers suggest, among other factors, a systematic underestimation bias in intake data. Caution is needed in the use of dietary folate data to estimate the prevalence of inadequacy among population groups. The use of dietary data for rank order comparisons or to estimate the potential for dietary excess is likely more reliable.
Background: Public health concerns with regard to both low and high folate status exist in the United States. Recent publications have questioned the utility of self-reported dietary intake data in research and monitoring. Objectives: The purpose of this analysis was to examine the relation between self-reported folate intakes and folate status biomarkers and to evaluate their usefulness for several types of applications.Design: We examined usual dietary intakes of folate by using the National Cancer Institute method to adjust two 24-h dietary recalls (including dietary supplements) for within-person variation and then compared these intakes with serum and red blood cell (RBC) folate among 4878 men and nonpregnant, nonlactating women aged ≥19 y in NHANES 2011-2012, a nationally representative, cross-sectional survey, with respect to consistency across prevalence estimates and rank order comparisons. Results: There was a very low prevalence (<1%) of folate deficiency when serum (<7 nmol/L) and RBC (<305 nmol/L) folate were considered, whereas a higher proportion of the population reported inadequate total dietary folate intakes (6%). Similar patterns of change occurred between intakes and biomarkers of folate status when distributions were examined (i.e., dose response), particularly when diet was expressed in μg. Intakes greater than the Tolerable Upper Intake Level greatly increased the odds of having high serum folate (OR: 17.6; 95% CI: 5.5, 56.0).Conclusions: When assessing folate status in the United States, where fortification and supplement use are common, similar patterns in the distributions of diet and biomarkers suggest that these 2 types of status indicators reflect the same underlying folate status; however, the higher prevalence estimates for inadequate intakes compared with biomarkers suggest, among other factors, a systematic underestimation bias in intake data. Caution is needed in the use of dietary folate data to estimate the prevalence of inadequacy among population groups. The use of dietary data for rank order comparisons or to estimate the potential for dietary excess is likely more reliable.
Authors: Christine M Pfeiffer; Maya R Sternberg; Zia Fazili; David A Lacher; Mindy Zhang; Clifford L Johnson; Heather C Hamner; Regan L Bailey; Jeanne I Rader; Sedigheh Yamini; R J Berry; Elizabeth A Yetley Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Alejandro F Castro; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Tom Greene; Josef Coresh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Janet M Roseland; Joanne M Holden; Karen W Andrews; Cuiwei Zhao; Amy Schweitzer; James Harnly; Wayne R Wolf; Charles R Perry; Johanna T Dwyer; Mary Frances Picciano; Joseph M Betz; Leila G Saldanha; Elizabeth A Yetley; Kenneth D Fisher; Katherine E Sharpless Journal: J Food Compost Anal Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 4.556
Authors: Elizabeth A Yetley; Christine M Pfeiffer; Karen W Phinney; Zia Fazili; David A Lacher; Regan L Bailey; Sheena Blackmore; Jay L Bock; Lawrence C Brody; Ralph Carmel; L Randy Curtin; Ramón A Durazo-Arvizu; John H Eckfeldt; Ralph Green; Jesse F Gregory; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Donald W Jacobsen; Paul F Jacques; Anne M Molloy; Joseph Massaro; James L Mills; Ebba Nexo; Jeanne I Rader; Jacob Selhub; Christopher Sempos; Barry Shane; Sally Stabler; Patrick Stover; Tsunenobu Tamura; Alison Tedstone; Susan J Thorpe; Paul M Coates; Clifford L Johnson; Mary Frances Picciano Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2011-05-18 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Regan L Bailey; Kevin W Dodd; Jaime J Gahche; Johanna T Dwyer; Alexandra E Cowan; Shinyoung Jun; Heather A Eicher-Miller; Patricia M Guenther; Anindya Bhadra; Paul R Thomas; Nancy Potischman; Raymond J Carroll; Janet A Tooze Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Karen W Andrews; Pavel A Gusev; Malikah McNeal; Sushma Savarala; Phuong Tan V Dang; Laura Oh; Renata Atkinson; Pamela R Pehrsson; Johanna T Dwyer; Leila G Saldanha; Joseph M Betz; Rebecca B Costello; Larry W Douglass Journal: J Nutr Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Shinyoung Jun; Alexandra E Cowan; Anindya Bhadra; Kevin W Dodd; Johanna T Dwyer; Heather A Eicher-Miller; Jaime J Gahche; Patricia M Guenther; Nancy Potischman; Janet A Tooze; Regan L Bailey Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2020-05-29 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Eva-Maria Navarrete-Muñoz; Jesus Vioque; Estefanía Toledo; Alejando Oncina-Canovas; Miguel Ángel Martínez-González; Jordi Salas-Salvadó; Dolores Corella; Montserrat Fitó; Dora Romaguera; Ángel M Alonso-Gómez; Julia Wärnberg; J Alfredo Martínez; Luís Serra-Majem; Ramon Estruch; Francisco J Tinahones; José Lapetra; Xavier Pintó; Josep A Tur; José López-Miranda; Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas; Pilar Matía-Martín; Lidia Daimiel; Vicente Martín Sánchez; Josep Vidal; Ana Isabel de Cos Blanco; Emili Ros; Javier Diez-Espino; Nancy Babio; Rebeca Fernandez-Carrion; Olga Castañer; Antoni Colom; Laura Compañ-Gabucio; Itziar Salaverria Lete; Edelys Crespo-Oliva; Itziar Abete; Laura Tomaino; Rosa Casas; José Carlos Fernandez-Garcia; José Manuel Santos-Lozano; Iziar Sarasa; José M Gámez; José M Antonio Garcia-Rios; Sandra Martín-Pelaez; Miguel Ruiz-Canela; Andrés Díaz-López; Raul Martinez-Lacruz; Maria Dolors Zomeño; Elena Rayó; Cristina Gisbert Sellés; Silvia Canudas; Albert Goday; Manoli García-de-la-Hera Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Padma Maruvada; Patrick J Stover; Joel B Mason; Regan L Bailey; Cindy D Davis; Martha S Field; Richard H Finnell; Cutberto Garza; Ralph Green; Jean-Louis Gueant; Paul F Jacques; David M Klurfeld; Yvonne Lamers; Amanda J MacFarlane; Joshua W Miller; Anne M Molloy; Deborah L O'Connor; Christine M Pfeiffer; Nancy A Potischman; Joseph V Rodricks; Irwin H Rosenberg; Sharon A Ross; Barry Shane; Jacob Selhub; Sally P Stabler; Jacquetta Trasler; Sedigheh Yamini; Giovanna Zappalà Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Daniel Cummings; Kevin F Dowling; Noah J Silverstein; Alexandra S Tanner; Hamdi Eryilmaz; Jordan W Smoller; Joshua L Roffman Journal: Nutrients Date: 2017-09-08 Impact factor: 5.717