Literature DB >> 28445578

Utility of a Noninvasive 2-Gene Molecular Assay for Cutaneous Melanoma and Effect on the Decision to Biopsy.

Laura K Ferris1, Burkhard Jansen2, Jonhan Ho1, Klaus J Busam3, Kenneth Gross4, Doyle D Hansen5, John P Alsobrook2, Zuxu Yao2, Gary L Peck6, Pedram Gerami7.   

Abstract

Importance: Expression of long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 518 (LINC00518) and preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) genes, obtained via noninvasive adhesive patch biopsy, is a sensitive and specific method for detection of cutaneous melanoma. However, the utility of this test in biopsy decisions made by dermatologists has not been evaluated. Objective: To determine the utility of the pigmented lesion assay (PLA) for LINC00518/PRAME expression in decisions to biopsy a series of pigmented skin lesions. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this secure web-based, multiple-reader-multiple-case study, 45 board-certified dermatologists each evaluated 60 clinical and dermoscopic images of clinically atypical pigmented lesions, first without and then with PLA gene expression information and were asked whether the lesions should be biopsied. Data were collected from March 24, 2014, through November 13, 2015. Interventions: Participants were given a report for each lesion, which included the results of an assay for expression of LINC00518/PRAME and a PLA score with data on the predictive values of the information provided. Main Outcomes and Measures: Biopsy sensitivity and specificity with vs without PLA data.
Results: Forty-five dermatologists (29 male and 16 female) performed the evaluation. After incorporating the PLA into their decision as to whether to biopsy a pigmented lesion suggestive of melanoma, dermatologists improved their mean biopsy sensitivity from 95.0% to 98.6% (P = .01); specificity increased from 32.1% to 56.9% (P < .001) with PLA data. Conclusions and Relevance: The noninvasive PLA enables dermatologists to significantly improve biopsy specificity while maintaining or improving sensitivity. This result may increase the number of early melanomas biopsied and reduce the number of benign lesions biopsied, thereby improving patient outcomes and reducing health care costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28445578      PMCID: PMC5543318          DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.0473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Dermatol        ISSN: 2168-6068            Impact factor:   10.282


  22 in total

1.  How good are US dermatologists at discriminating skin cancers? A number-needed-to-treat analysis.

Authors:  Rebekah L Wilson; Brad A Yentzer; Scott P Isom; Steven R Feldman; Alan B Fleischer
Journal:  J Dermatolog Treat       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 3.359

2.  On the comparison of diagnosis and management of melanoma between dermatologists and MelaFind.

Authors:  Anthony R Cukras
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 10.282

3.  Diagnosing and managing cutaneous pigmented lesions: primary care physicians versus dermatologists.

Authors:  Suephy C Chen; Michelle L Pennie; Paul Kolm; Erin M Warshaw; Eric L Weisberg; Katherine M Brown; Michael E Ming; William S Weintraub
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Melanocytic tumors of uncertain malignant potential: results of a tutorial held at the XXIX Symposium of the International Society of Dermatopathology in Graz, October 2008.

Authors:  Lorenzo Cerroni; Raymond Barnhill; David Elder; Geoffrey Gottlieb; Peter Heenan; Heinz Kutzner; Philip E LeBoit; Martin Mihm; Juan Rosai; Helmut Kerl
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  How good are skin cancer clinics at melanoma detection? Number needed to treat variability across a national clinic group in Australia.

Authors:  Craig Hansen; David Wilkinson; Mary Hansen; Giuseppe Argenziano
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 11.527

6.  The performance of MelaFind: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Gary Monheit; Armand B Cognetta; Laura Ferris; Harold Rabinovitz; Kenneth Gross; Mary Martini; James M Grichnik; Martin Mihm; Victor G Prieto; Paul Googe; Roy King; Alicia Toledano; Nikolai Kabelev; Maciej Wojton; Dina Gutkowicz-Krusin
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2010-10-18

Review 7.  Discordance in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanoma and melanocytic nevi between expert pathologists.

Authors:  E R Farmer; R Gonin; M P Hanna
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  The impact of subspecialization and dermatoscopy use on accuracy of melanoma diagnosis among primary care doctors in Australia.

Authors:  Cliff Rosendahl; Gail Williams; Diann Eley; Tobias Wilson; Greg Canning; Jeffrey Keir; Ian McColl; David Wilkinson
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 11.527

9.  Computer-aided classification of melanocytic lesions using dermoscopic images.

Authors:  Laura K Ferris; Jan A Harkes; Benjamin Gilbert; Daniel G Winger; Kseniya Golubets; Oleg Akilov; Mahadev Satyanarayanan
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  The impact of dermoscopy on the management of pigmented lesions in everyday clinical practice of general dermatologists: a prospective study.

Authors:  J I van der Rhee; W Bergman; N A Kukutsch
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.302

View more
  13 in total

1.  PRAME Expression in Melanocytic Tumors.

Authors:  Cecilia Lezcano; Achim A Jungbluth; Kishwer S Nehal; Travis J Hollmann; Klaus J Busam
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Economic Analysis of a Noninvasive Molecular Pathologic Assay for Pigmented Skin Lesions.

Authors:  John Hornberger; Daniel M Siegel
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 3.  PRAME Immunohistochemistry as an Ancillary Test for the Assessment of Melanocytic Lesions.

Authors:  Cecilia Lezcano; Achim A Jungbluth; Klaus J Busam
Journal:  Surg Pathol Clin       Date:  2021-04-28

4.  Comparison of Immunohistochemistry for PRAME With Cytogenetic Test Results in the Evaluation of Challenging Melanocytic Tumors.

Authors:  Cecilia Lezcano; Achim A Jungbluth; Klaus J Busam
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 6.298

Review 5.  Current Molecular Markers of Melanoma and Treatment Targets.

Authors:  Kevin Yang; Allen S W Oak; Radomir M Slominski; Anna A Brożyna; Andrzej T Slominski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Long noncoding RNA LINC00518 induces radioresistance by regulating glycolysis through an miR-33a-3p/HIF-1α negative feedback loop in melanoma.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Dong He; Mengqing Xiao; Yuxing Zhu; Jianda Zhou; Ke Cao
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 8.469

7.  Shared Gene Expression and Immune Pathway Changes Associated with Progression from Nevi to Melanoma.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Borden; Anngela C Adams; Kenneth H Buetow; Melissa A Wilson; Julie E Bauman; Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski; H-H Sherry Chow; Bonnie J LaFleur; Karen Taraszka Hastings
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 8.  Role of Biomarkers in the Integrated Management of Melanoma.

Authors:  Piyu Parth Naik
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 3.434

9.  Pigmented Lesion Assay for Suspected Melanoma Lesions: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2021-06-04

10.  Long noncoding RNA LINC00518 acts as a competing endogenous RNA to promote the metastasis of malignant melanoma via miR-204-5p/AP1S2 axis.

Authors:  Wenkang Luan; Yuting Ding; Shaojun Ma; Hongru Ruan; Jinlong Wang; Feng Lu
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 8.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.