Literature DB >> 21756146

How good are US dermatologists at discriminating skin cancers? A number-needed-to-treat analysis.

Rebekah L Wilson1, Brad A Yentzer, Scott P Isom, Steven R Feldman, Alan B Fleischer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Identification of skin cancer requires discrimination of malignant lesions from benign lesions. The number of biopsies performed to yield one cancer diagnosis can be presented as a number needed to treat (NNT), and provides an assessment of the efficiency of skin cancer detection.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical accuracy of US dermatologists screening for skin cancer, the NNT for both melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer was examined.
METHODS: Pathology reports from 2021 biopsies performed at the Wake Forest University Department of Dermatology were reviewed, including the physician's differential diagnosis and final pathological diagnosis. The NNT was calculated for melanoma, non-melanoma skin cancer, and all skin cancer diagnosed.
RESULTS: Of 1240 biopsies suspicious for skin cancer, 559 cancers were diagnosed, yielding a NNT of 2.22 for any cancer. The NNT specifically for non-melanoma skin cancer was 1.6, while the NNT for melanoma was 15. Patient age, anatomical location, sex and physician all significantly impacted on NNT values.
CONCLUSIONS: The NNT for melanoma in our study was lower compared to recently published values obtained from general practitioners in Australian skin cancer clinics (NNT of 30). Variability amongst institutions, practice settings and physicians supports the need to establish a benchmark NNT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21756146     DOI: 10.3109/09546634.2010.512951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dermatolog Treat        ISSN: 0954-6634            Impact factor:   3.359


  11 in total

1.  Estimating the cost of skin cancer detection by dermatology providers in a large health care system.

Authors:  Martha Matsumoto; Aaron Secrest; Alyce Anderson; Melissa I Saul; Jonhan Ho; John M Kirkwood; Laura K Ferris
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  Utility of a Noninvasive 2-Gene Molecular Assay for Cutaneous Melanoma and Effect on the Decision to Biopsy.

Authors:  Laura K Ferris; Burkhard Jansen; Jonhan Ho; Klaus J Busam; Kenneth Gross; Doyle D Hansen; John P Alsobrook; Zuxu Yao; Gary L Peck; Pedram Gerami
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 3.  New diagnostic aids for melanoma.

Authors:  Laura Korb Ferris; Ryan J Harris
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.478

4.  Meta-analysis of number needed to treat for diagnosis of melanoma by clinical setting.

Authors:  Amy J Petty; Bradley Ackerson; Reed Garza; Michael Peterson; Beiyu Liu; Cynthia Green; Michelle Pavlis
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Optical Radiomic Signatures Derived from Optical Coherence Tomography Images Improve Identification of Melanoma.

Authors:  Zahra Turani; Emad Fatemizadeh; Tatiana Blumetti; Steven Daveluy; Ana Flavia Moraes; Wei Chen; Darius Mehregan; Peter E Andersen; Mohammadreza Nasiriavanaki
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Lentigo maligna melanoma with a history of cosmetic treatment: Prevalence, surgical outcomes and considerations.

Authors:  Brian P Hibler; Karen L Connolly; Erica H Lee; Anthony M Rossi; Kishwer S Nehal
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 4.025

7.  Quantified ultrasound elastography in the assessment of cutaneous carcinoma.

Authors:  Bahar Dasgeb; Michael A Morris; Darius Mehregan; Eliot L Siegel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Economic Analysis of a Noninvasive Molecular Pathologic Assay for Pigmented Skin Lesions.

Authors:  John Hornberger; Daniel M Siegel
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 10.282

9.  Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Techniques for Melanoma Detection: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alessia Blundo; Arianna Cignoni; Tommaso Banfi; Gastone Ciuti
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-04-21

10.  Assessment of Raman Spectroscopy for Reducing Unnecessary Biopsies for Melanoma Screening.

Authors:  Yao Zhang; Austin J Moy; Xu Feng; Hieu T M Nguyen; Katherine R Sebastian; Jason S Reichenberg; Claus O Wilke; Mia K Markey; James W Tunnell
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.