J I van der Rhee1, W Bergman, N A Kukutsch. 1. Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, RC Leiden, The Netherlands. j.i.van_der_rhee@lumc.nl
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dermoscopy greatly improves the clinical diagnosis of pigmented lesions. Few studies have investigated, however, how dermoscopy is guiding management decisions in everyday clinical practice. In addition, most studies have been performed in the setting of dermoscopy experts working in pigmented lesion clinics. OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of dermoscopy on clinical diagnosis and management decisions for pigmented lesions in everyday practice of general dermatologists. METHODS: We performed a prospective study in general dermatology clinics in community hospitals run by dermatologists with intermediate dermoscopy experience and expertise. Each clinician independently included suspicious lesions from consecutive patients. Pre- and postdermoscopy diagnoses and management decisions were recorded. Pathology was used as reference diagnosis. RESULTS: In total, 209 suspicious lesions were included in the study by 17 dermatologists. Fourteen lesions were histologically proven in situ or invasive malignant melanomas. Based on clinical diagnoses, dermoscopy improved sensitivity from 0.79 to 0.86 (P = 1.0). All 14 melanomas were intended to be excised based on naked eye examination alone, independent of dermoscopic evaluation. Specificity increased from 0.96 to 0.98 (P = 0.22). Dermoscopy resulted in a 9% reduction of the number of excisions. CONCLUSIONS: Dermoscopy reduced the number of excisions, but did not improve the detection of melanomas. Our results suggest that in everyday clinical practice of general dermatologists the main contribution of dermoscopy is a reduction of unnecessary excisions.
BACKGROUND: Dermoscopy greatly improves the clinical diagnosis of pigmented lesions. Few studies have investigated, however, how dermoscopy is guiding management decisions in everyday clinical practice. In addition, most studies have been performed in the setting of dermoscopy experts working in pigmented lesion clinics. OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of dermoscopy on clinical diagnosis and management decisions for pigmented lesions in everyday practice of general dermatologists. METHODS: We performed a prospective study in general dermatology clinics in community hospitals run by dermatologists with intermediate dermoscopy experience and expertise. Each clinician independently included suspicious lesions from consecutive patients. Pre- and postdermoscopy diagnoses and management decisions were recorded. Pathology was used as reference diagnosis. RESULTS: In total, 209 suspicious lesions were included in the study by 17 dermatologists. Fourteen lesions were histologically proven in situ or invasive malignant melanomas. Based on clinical diagnoses, dermoscopy improved sensitivity from 0.79 to 0.86 (P = 1.0). All 14 melanomas were intended to be excised based on naked eye examination alone, independent of dermoscopic evaluation. Specificity increased from 0.96 to 0.98 (P = 0.22). Dermoscopy resulted in a 9% reduction of the number of excisions. CONCLUSIONS: Dermoscopy reduced the number of excisions, but did not improve the detection of melanomas. Our results suggest that in everyday clinical practice of general dermatologists the main contribution of dermoscopy is a reduction of unnecessary excisions.
Authors: Laura K Ferris; Burkhard Jansen; Jonhan Ho; Klaus J Busam; Kenneth Gross; Doyle D Hansen; John P Alsobrook; Zuxu Yao; Gary L Peck; Pedram Gerami Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Luiz Guilherme Martins Castro; Maria Cristina Messina; Walter Loureiro; Ricardo Silvestre Macarenco; João Pedreira Duprat Neto; Thais Helena Bello Di Giacomo; Flávia Vasques Bittencourt; Renato Marchiori Bakos; Sérgio Schrader Serpa; Hamilton Ometto Stolf; Gabriel Gontijo Journal: An Bras Dermatol Date: 2015 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.896
Authors: Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Naomi Chuchu; Rubeta N Matin; Kai Yuen Wong; Roger Benjamin Aldridge; Alana Durack; Abha Gulati; Sue Ann Chan; Louise Johnston; Susan E Bayliss; Jo Leonardi-Bee; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; Colette O'Sullivan; Hamid Tehrani; Hywel C Williams Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-12-04
Authors: Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Naomi Chuchu; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Rubeta N Matin; David R Thomson; Kai Yuen Wong; Roger Benjamin Aldridge; Rachel Abbott; Monica Fawzy; Susan E Bayliss; Matthew J Grainge; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; Kathie Godfrey; Fiona M Walter; Hywel C Williams Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-12-04
Authors: Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Matthew J Grainge; Naomi Chuchu; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Rubeta N Matin; David R Thomson; Kai Yuen Wong; Roger Benjamin Aldridge; Rachel Abbott; Monica Fawzy; Susan E Bayliss; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; Kathie Godfrey; Fiona M Walter; Hywel C Williams Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-12-04
Authors: Pedram Gerami; Zuxu Yao; David Polsky; Burkhard Jansen; Klaus Busam; Jonhan Ho; Mary Martini; Laura K Ferris Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2016-10-01 Impact factor: 11.527