Laurence Klotz1, Rodney H Breau2, Loretta L Collins3, Martin E Gleave4, Tom Pickles5, Frederic Pouliot6, Fred Saad7. 1. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. 2. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 3. Kaleidoscope Strategic, Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 5. British Colombia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 6. Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, Quebec City, QC, Canada. 7. Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Testosterone suppression, or androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), is an established treatment for recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). Based on the accuracy and sensitivity of early assays (c. 1960-1970), the castrate testosterone level was set at ≤1.7 nmol/l. Improved sensitivity of testosterone assays shows that both surgical and medical castration can achieve levels <0.7 nmol/l. However, the clinical implications and importance of maximum testosterone suppression remains a subject of controversy. This evidence-based review assesses prospective and retrospective clinical data, linking maximum suppression of testosterone with improved outcomes from ADT. METHODS: PubMed and conference proceedings were searched for studies assessing the impact of low testosterone on clinical outcomes from ADT. The key search terms included combinations of prostate cancer and testosterone, predictive/prognostic, and androgen deprivation. Results were limited to studies investigating the relationship between testosterone levels and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Both prospective and retrospective data support a relationship between testosterone levels below the historical standard of 1.7 nmol/l and improved outcomes. Eight studies showed significant improvements in survival-related outcomes, with the majority of data supporting a testosterone level cutoff of ≤0.7 nmol/l. CONCLUSIONS: Tracking both testosterone and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels has significant clinical benefits, and the serum testosterone threshold of ≤0.7 nmol/l is a practical goal. The relative levels of testosterone and PSA may indicate continued hormone responsiveness or progression toward castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and should, therefore, inform treatment strategy. Standardization of assay methods and clinical coordination to facilitate widespread access to state-of the art laboratory equipment is necessary to ensure accurate decision-making.
INTRODUCTION:Testosterone suppression, or androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), is an established treatment for recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). Based on the accuracy and sensitivity of early assays (c. 1960-1970), the castrate testosterone level was set at ≤1.7 nmol/l. Improved sensitivity of testosterone assays shows that both surgical and medical castration can achieve levels <0.7 nmol/l. However, the clinical implications and importance of maximum testosterone suppression remains a subject of controversy. This evidence-based review assesses prospective and retrospective clinical data, linking maximum suppression of testosterone with improved outcomes from ADT. METHODS: PubMed and conference proceedings were searched for studies assessing the impact of low testosterone on clinical outcomes from ADT. The key search terms included combinations of prostate cancer and testosterone, predictive/prognostic, and androgen deprivation. Results were limited to studies investigating the relationship between testosterone levels and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Both prospective and retrospective data support a relationship between testosterone levels below the historical standard of 1.7 nmol/l and improved outcomes. Eight studies showed significant improvements in survival-related outcomes, with the majority of data supporting a testosterone level cutoff of ≤0.7 nmol/l. CONCLUSIONS: Tracking both testosterone and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels has significant clinical benefits, and the serum testosterone threshold of ≤0.7 nmol/l is a practical goal. The relative levels of testosterone and PSA may indicate continued hormone responsiveness or progression toward castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and should, therefore, inform treatment strategy. Standardization of assay methods and clinical coordination to facilitate widespread access to state-of the art laboratory equipment is necessary to ensure accurate decision-making.
Authors: Fred Saad; Kim N Chi; Antonio Finelli; Sebastien J Hotte; Jonathan Izawa; Anil Kapoor; Wassim Kassouf; Andrew Loblaw; Scott North; Ricardo Rendon; Alan So; Nawaid Usmani; Eric Vigneault; Neil E Fleshner Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2015 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: J Seidenfeld; D J Samson; V Hasselblad; N Aronson; P C Albertsen; C L Bennett; T J Wilt Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2000-04-04 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: M Shiota; N Fujimoto; A Yokomizo; A Takeuchi; E Kashiwagi; T Dejima; K Kiyoshima; J Inokuchi; K Tatsugami; M Eto Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Gunther Boysen; Semini Sumanasuriya; George Seed; Angelo M De Marzo; Johann de Bono Journal: J Pathol Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Laurence Klotz; Bobby Shayegan; Chantal Guillemette; Loretta L Collins; Geoffrey Gotto; Dominique Guérette; Marie-Paule Jammal; Tom Pickles; Patrick O Richard; Fred Saad Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: M Reza Sadaie; Mehdi Farhoudi; Masumeh Zamanlu; Nasser Aghamohammadzadeh; Atieh Amouzegar; Robert E Rosenbaum; Gary A Thomas Journal: Ther Adv Drug Saf Date: 2018-05-08