Literature DB >> 29680011

Testosterone suppression in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer - A Canadian consensus statement.

Laurence Klotz1, Bobby Shayegan2, Chantal Guillemette3, Loretta L Collins4, Geoffrey Gotto5, Dominique Guérette3, Marie-Paule Jammal6, Tom Pickles7, Patrick O Richard8, Fred Saad9.   

Abstract

Testosterone suppression, achieved through orchiectomy or medically induced androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), is a standard treatment for men with recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer. Current assay methods demonstrate the capacity for testosterone suppression to <0.7 nmol/l, and clinical data support improved outcomes from ADT when lower levels are achieved. Practical clinical guidelines are warranted to facilitate adoption of 0.7 nmol/l as the new standard castrate testosterone level.A pan-Canadian group of experts, representing diverse clinical specialties, identified key clinical issues, searched and reviewed relevant literature, and developed consensus statements on testosterone suppression for the treatment of prostate cancer. The expert panel found that current evidence supports the clinical benefit of achieving low testosterone levels during ADT, and encourage adoption of ≤0.7 nmol/l as a new castrate level threshold. The panel recommends regular monitoring of testosterone (e.g., every 3-6 months) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels as clinically appropriate (e.g., every 3-6 months) during ADT, with reassessment of therapeutic strategy if testosterone is not suppressed or if PSA rises regardless of adequate testosterone suppression. The panel also emphasizes the need for greater awareness and education regarding testosterone assay specifications, and strongly promotes the use of mass spectrometry-based assays to ensure accurate measurement of testosterone at castrate levels.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29680011      PMCID: PMC5937399          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.5116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  40 in total

1.  Toward excellence in testosterone testing: a consensus statement.

Authors:  William Rosner; Hubert Vesper
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  DETERMINATION OF TESTOSTERONE IN HUMAN PERIPHERAL AND ADRENAL VENOUS PLASMA.

Authors:  H G BURGER; J R KENT; A E KELLIE
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  The 2015 CUA-CUOG Guidelines for the management of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

Authors:  Fred Saad; Kim N Chi; Antonio Finelli; Sebastien J Hotte; Jonathan Izawa; Anil Kapoor; Wassim Kassouf; Andrew Loblaw; Scott North; Ricardo Rendon; Alan So; Nawaid Usmani; Eric Vigneault; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Measurement of serum testosterone during androgenic suppression in patients with prostate cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  J Morote; L Regis; A Celma; J Planas
Journal:  Actas Urol Esp       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 0.994

Review 5.  Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  M Han; A W Partin; C R Pound; J I Epstein; P C Walsh
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.241

6.  Position statement: Utility, limitations, and pitfalls in measuring testosterone: an Endocrine Society position statement.

Authors:  William Rosner; Richard J Auchus; Ricardo Azziz; Patrick M Sluss; Hershel Raff
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 7.  The molecular underpinnings of prostate cancer: impacts on management and pathology practice.

Authors:  Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Gunther Boysen; Semini Sumanasuriya; George Seed; Angelo M De Marzo; Johann de Bono
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  Measurement of free testosterone in normal women and women with androgen deficiency: comparison of methods.

Authors:  Karen K Miller; William Rosner; Hang Lee; Joan Hier; Gemma Sesmilo; David Schoenfeld; Gregory Neubauer; Anne Klibanski
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Total testosterone, free-androgen index, calculated free testosterone, and free testosterone by analog RIA compared in hirsute women and in otherwise-normal women with altered binding of sex-hormone-binding globulin.

Authors:  T J Wilke; D J Utley
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Incomplete testosterone suppression with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists: does it happen and does it matter?

Authors:  Tom Pickles; Jeremy Hamm; W James Morris; William E Schreiber; Scott Tyldesley
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  3 in total

1.  A prospective study of the effect of testosterone escape on preradiotherapy prostate-specific antigen kinetics in prostate cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  David R H Christie; Natalia Mitina; Christopher F Sharpley
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2021-03-29

2.  Discordance between testosterone measurement methods in castrated prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Mélanie Rouleau; Francis Lemire; Michel Déry; Benoît Thériault; Gabriel Dubois; Yves Fradet; Paul Toren; Chantal Guillemette; Louis Lacombe; Laurence Klotz; Fred Saad; Dominique Guérette; Frédéric Pouliot
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.335

3.  Androgen deprivation monotherapy usage in non-metastatic prostate cancer: results from eight European countries.

Authors:  Dionysios Mitropoulos; Piotr Chlosta; Michael Häggman; Torbjorn Ström; Vyron Markussis
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-03-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.