L Klotz1, P Toren. 1. University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Intermittent androgen deprivation is increasingly used as an alternative to continuous life-long androgen deprivation therapy for men with advanced or recurrent prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Two recent phase iii trials have clarified the benefits of intermittent therapy. The Canadian-led pr.7 trial in men with nonmetastatic disease and prostate-specific antigen recurrence after definitive local therapy showed that intermittent therapy resulted in survival equivalent to that with continuous therapy, with significant improvements in quality of life. Patients on intermittent therapy experienced improved bone health, fewer metabolic and hematologic disturbances, fewer hot flashes, and improved sexual function. In men with metastatic disease, the data are less clear. The long-awaited results of the Southwest Oncology Group 9346 trial, comparing intermittent with continuous therapy in metastatic disease, showed no difference in overall survival. Post hoc stratification analysis showed a worse outcome in patients with "minimal" metastatic disease, and no difference in those with widespread bone metastases. The significance of that observation is in dispute. The present review also addresses practical issues in the use of intermittent therapy, including patient selection, follow-up, and therapy cycling. SUMMARY: The recent results of randomized clinical trials now establish that intermittent androgen deprivation therapy is an approach that should be considered the standard of care in most patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer requiring hormonal therapy and in selected patients with metastatic disease. KEY POINTS: Level i evidence supports the oncologic equivalence of intermittent compared with continuous androgen blockade in men with biochemical failure.Compared with continuous androgen deprivation, intermittent therapy demonstrates improved quality of life and fewer side effects.Patient selection for intermittent therapy is important to maintain good oncologic results.Monitoring of prostate-specific androgen response and duration of off-treatment intervals allow for stratification of patients by risk of progression.
PURPOSE: Intermittent androgen deprivation is increasingly used as an alternative to continuous life-long androgen deprivation therapy for men with advanced or recurrent prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Two recent phase iii trials have clarified the benefits of intermittent therapy. The Canadian-led pr.7 trial in men with nonmetastatic disease and prostate-specific antigen recurrence after definitive local therapy showed that intermittent therapy resulted in survival equivalent to that with continuous therapy, with significant improvements in quality of life. Patients on intermittent therapy experienced improved bone health, fewer metabolic and hematologic disturbances, fewer hot flashes, and improved sexual function. In men with metastatic disease, the data are less clear. The long-awaited results of the Southwest Oncology Group 9346 trial, comparing intermittent with continuous therapy in metastatic disease, showed no difference in overall survival. Post hoc stratification analysis showed a worse outcome in patients with "minimal" metastatic disease, and no difference in those with widespread bone metastases. The significance of that observation is in dispute. The present review also addresses practical issues in the use of intermittent therapy, including patient selection, follow-up, and therapy cycling. SUMMARY: The recent results of randomized clinical trials now establish that intermittent androgen deprivation therapy is an approach that should be considered the standard of care in most patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer requiring hormonal therapy and in selected patients with metastatic disease. KEY POINTS: Level i evidence supports the oncologic equivalence of intermittent compared with continuous androgen blockade in men with biochemical failure.Compared with continuous androgen deprivation, intermittent therapy demonstrates improved quality of life and fewer side effects.Patient selection for intermittent therapy is important to maintain good oncologic results.Monitoring of prostate-specific androgen response and duration of off-treatment intervals allow for stratification of patients by risk of progression.
Entities:
Keywords:
Androgen deprivation therapy; prostate cancer; quality of life
Authors: Edward M Messing; Judith Manola; Jorge Yao; Maureen Kiernan; David Crawford; George Wilding; P Anthony di'SantAgnese; Donald Trump Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: James L Gulley; William D Figg; Seth M Steinberg; Jane Carter; Oliver Sartor; Celestia S Higano; Daniel P Petrylak; Gerkamal Chatta; Maha H Hussain; William L Dahut Journal: J Urol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Mark C Scholz; Robert I Jennrich; Stephen B Strum; Henry J Johnson; Brad W Guess; Richard Y Lam Journal: J Urol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Juan Morote; Anna Orsola; Jacques Planas; Enrique Trilla; Carles X Raventós; Lluís Cecchini; Roberto Catalán Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-08-14 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Fernando E C Calais da Silva; Aldo V Bono; Peter Whelan; Maurizio Brausi; Anton Marques Queimadelos; Jose A Portillo Martin; Ziya Kirkali; Fernando M V Calais da Silva; Chris Robertson Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2009-02-21 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Jean de Leval; Philippe Boca; Enis Yousef; Hubert Nicolas; Michel Jeukenne; Laurence Seidel; Christian Bouffioux; Luc Coppens; Pierre Bonnet; Robert Andrianne; David Wlatregny Journal: Clin Prostate Cancer Date: 2002-12
Authors: Laurence Klotz; Rodney H Breau; Loretta L Collins; Martin E Gleave; Tom Pickles; Frederic Pouliot; Fred Saad Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2017 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Fangfang Qu; Wanling Xie; Mari Nakabayashi; Haitao Zhang; Seong Ho Jeong; Xiaodong Wang; Kazumasa Komura; Christopher J Sweeney; Oliver Sartor; Gwo-Shu Mary Lee; Philip W Kantoff Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Xiaodong Wang; Lauren C Harshman; Wanling Xie; Mari Nakabayashi; Fangfang Qu; Mark M Pomerantz; Gwo-Shu Mary Lee; Philip W Kantoff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-12-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Laurence Klotz; Chris O'Callaghan; Keyue Ding; Paul Toren; David Dearnaley; Celestia S Higano; Eric Horwitz; Shawn Malone; Larry Goldenberg; Mary Gospodarowicz; Juanita M Crook Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-03-02 Impact factor: 44.544