Brennan C Kahan1, Desponia Koulenti2,3, Kostoula Arvaniti4, Vanessa Beavis5, Douglas Campbell5, Matthew Chan6, Rui Moreno7, Rupert M Pearse8,9. 1. Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AT, UK. 2. Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece. 3. University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. 4. Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece. 5. Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. 6. Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, Hong Kong. 7. Hospital de São José, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. 8. Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK. r.pearse@qmul.ac.uk. 9. Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, London, E1 1BB, UK. r.pearse@qmul.ac.uk.
Abstract
PURPOSE: As global initiatives increase patient access to surgical treatments, there is a need to define optimal levels of perioperative care. Our aim was to describe the relationship between the provision and use of critical care resources and postoperative mortality. METHODS: Planned analysis of data collected during an international 7-day cohort study of adults undergoing elective in-patient surgery. We used risk-adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression models to evaluate the association between admission to critical care immediately after surgery and in-hospital mortality. We evaluated hospital-level associations between mortality and critical care admission immediately after surgery, critical care admission to treat life-threatening complications, and hospital provision of critical care beds. We evaluated the effect of national income using interaction tests. RESULTS: 44,814 patients from 474 hospitals in 27 countries were available for analysis. Death was more frequent amongst patients admitted directly to critical care after surgery (critical care: 103/4317 patients [2%], standard ward: 99/39,566 patients [0.3%]; adjusted OR 3.01 [2.10-5.21]; p < 0.001). This association may differ with national income (high income countries OR 2.50 vs. low and middle income countries OR 4.68; p = 0.07). At hospital level, there was no association between mortality and critical care admission directly after surgery (p = 0.26), critical care admission to treat complications (p = 0.33), or provision of critical care beds (p = 0.70). Findings of the hospital-level analyses were not affected by national income status. A sensitivity analysis including only high-risk patients yielded similar findings. CONCLUSIONS: We did not identify any survival benefit from critical care admission following surgery.
PURPOSE: As global initiatives increase patient access to surgical treatments, there is a need to define optimal levels of perioperative care. Our aim was to describe the relationship between the provision and use of critical care resources and postoperative mortality. METHODS: Planned analysis of data collected during an international 7-day cohort study of adults undergoing elective in-patient surgery. We used risk-adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression models to evaluate the association between admission to critical care immediately after surgery and in-hospital mortality. We evaluated hospital-level associations between mortality and critical care admission immediately after surgery, critical care admission to treat life-threatening complications, and hospital provision of critical care beds. We evaluated the effect of national income using interaction tests. RESULTS: 44,814 patients from 474 hospitals in 27 countries were available for analysis. Death was more frequent amongst patients admitted directly to critical care after surgery (critical care: 103/4317 patients [2%], standard ward: 99/39,566 patients [0.3%]; adjusted OR 3.01 [2.10-5.21]; p < 0.001). This association may differ with national income (high income countries OR 2.50 vs. low and middle income countries OR 4.68; p = 0.07). At hospital level, there was no association between mortality and critical care admission directly after surgery (p = 0.26), critical care admission to treat complications (p = 0.33), or provision of critical care beds (p = 0.70). Findings of the hospital-level analyses were not affected by national income status. A sensitivity analysis including only high-risk patients yielded similar findings. CONCLUSIONS: We did not identify any survival benefit from critical care admission following surgery.
Authors: Blake C Alkire; Nakul P Raykar; Mark G Shrime; Thomas G Weiser; Stephen W Bickler; John A Rose; Cameron T Nutt; Sarah L M Greenberg; Meera Kotagal; Johanna N Riesel; Micaela Esquivel; Tarsicio Uribe-Leitz; George Molina; Nobhojit Roy; John G Meara; Paul E Farmer Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: John Rose; Thomas G Weiser; Phil Hider; Leona Wilson; Russell L Gruen; Stephen W Bickler Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Jeffrey H Silber; Paul R Rosenbaum; Matthew D McHugh; Justin M Ludwig; Herbert L Smith; Bijan A Niknam; Orit Even-Shoshan; Lee A Fleisher; Rachel R Kelz; Linda H Aiken Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: M A Gillies; E M Harrison; R M Pearse; S Garrioch; C Haddow; L Smyth; R Parks; T S Walsh; N I Lone Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Michael A Gillies; G Sarah Power; David A Harrison; Andrew Fleming; Brian Cook; Timothy S Walsh; Rupert M Pearse; Kathryn M Rowan Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-07-23 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Rupert M Pearse; Rui P Moreno; Peter Bauer; Paolo Pelosi; Philipp Metnitz; Claudia Spies; Benoit Vallet; Jean-Louis Vincent; Andreas Hoeft; Andrew Rhodes Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-09-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: B A Ozdemir; S Sinha; A Karthikesalingam; J D Poloniecki; R M Pearse; M P W Grocott; M M Thompson; P J E Holt Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: C J Reuß; M Bernhard; C Beynon; A Hecker; C Jungk; C Nusshag; M A Weigand; D Michalski; T Brenner Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: Amy Lee Fowler; Orla Cullivan; Shomik Sibartie; Aidan O'Shea; Ronan Waldron; Iqbal Khan; Waqar Khan; Kevin M Barry Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2019-02-09 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Angela Jerath; Andreas Laupacis; Peter C Austin; Hannah Wunsch; Duminda N Wijeysundera Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-07-27 Impact factor: 17.440