Literature DB >> 28039249

Intensive care utilization and outcomes after high-risk surgery in Scotland: a population-based cohort study.

M A Gillies1, E M Harrison2, R M Pearse3, S Garrioch4, C Haddow5, L Smyth5, R Parks2, T S Walsh4, N I Lone4,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal perioperative use of intensive care unit (ICU) resources is not yet defined. We sought to determine the effect of ICU admission on perioperative (30 day) and long-term mortality.
METHODS: This was an observational study of all surgical patients in Scotland during 2005-7 followed up until 2012. Patient, operative, and care process factors were extracted. The primary outcome was perioperative mortality; secondary outcomes were 1 and 4 yr mortality. Multivariable regression was used to construct a risk prediction model to allow standard-risk and high-risk groups to be defined based on deciles of predicted perioperative mortality risk, and to determine the effect of ICU admission (direct from theatre; indirect after initial care on ward; no ICU admission) on outcome adjusted for confounders.
RESULTS: There were 572 598 patients included. The risk model performed well (c-index 0.92). Perioperative mortality occurred in 1125 (0.2%) in the standard-risk group (n=510 979) and in 3636 (6.4%) in the high-risk group (n=56 785). Patients with no ICU admission within 7 days of surgery had the lowest perioperative mortality (whole cohort 0.7%; high-risk cohort 5.3%). Indirect ICU admission was associated with a higher risk of perioperative mortality when compared with direct admission for the whole cohort (20.9 vs 12.1%; adjusted odds ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval 2.01-2.84; P<0.01) and for high-risk patients (26.2 vs 17.8%; adjusted odds ratio 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.37-1.96; P<0.01). Compared with direct ICU admission, indirectly admitted patients had higher severity of illness on admission, required more organ support, and had an increased duration of ICU stay.
CONCLUSIONS: Indirect ICU admission was associated with increased mortality and increased requirement for organ support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UKCRN registry no. 15761.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; intensive care; surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28039249     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aew396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  15 in total

1.  Do we really need postoperative ICU management after elective surgery? No, not any more!

Authors:  Paolo Taccone; Thomas Langer; Giacomo Grasselli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Corrigendum for Intensive Care Society State of the Art 2017 Abstracts.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2018-07-18

3.  Post-operative intensive care: is it really necessary?

Authors:  R M J Cashmore; A J Fowler; R M Pearse
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Intensive care utilization following major noncardiac surgical procedures in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study.

Authors:  Angela Jerath; Andreas Laupacis; Peter C Austin; Hannah Wunsch; Duminda N Wijeysundera
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Characteristics and outcomes of unplanned intensive care unit admission after general anesthesia.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Katori; Kentaro Yamakawa; Kosuke Yagi; Yoshihiro Kimura; Mayuko Doi; Shoichi Uezono
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.376

Review 6.  [Unplanned admission or readmission to the intensive care unit : Avoidable or fateful?]

Authors:  U Hamsen; C Waydhas; R Wildenauer; T A Schildhauer; W Schwenk
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  The association between ICU admission and emergency hospital readmission following emergency general surgery.

Authors:  Michael A Gillies; Sadia Ghaffar; Ewen Harrison; Catriona Haddow; Lorraine Smyth; Timothy S Walsh; Rupert M Pearse; Nazir I Lone
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2019-04-25

Review 8.  Current research priorities in perioperative intensive care medicine.

Authors:  Michael A Gillies; Michael Sander; Andrew Shaw; Duminda N Wijeysundera; John Myburgh; Cesar Aldecoa; Ib Jammer; Suzana M Lobo; Naomi Pritchard; Michael P W Grocott; Marcus J Schultz; Rupert M Pearse
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Counting the cost of cancelled surgery: a system wide approach is needed.

Authors:  M A Gillies; D N Wijeysundera; E M Harrison
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Critical care admission following elective surgery was not associated with survival benefit: prospective analysis of data from 27 countries.

Authors:  Brennan C Kahan; Desponia Koulenti; Kostoula Arvaniti; Vanessa Beavis; Douglas Campbell; Matthew Chan; Rui Moreno; Rupert M Pearse
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.