| Literature DB >> 28437452 |
Jubi Jacob1,2, Reshma Uma Rajendran1, Syama Hari Priya1, Jayamurthy Purushothaman1,2, Dileep Kumar Bhaskaran Nair Saraswathy Amma1,2.
Abstract
Streptomyces strains isolated from Nelliyampathy forest soil of Western Ghats, Kerala, India were evaluated for their antibacterial efficacy against two indicator pathogenic bacteria (Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus). Among 140 strains tested, sixteen recorded potent antibacterial properties and were further screened against eleven bacterial pathogens. A strain identified as Streptomyces nogalater and designated as NIIST A30 exhibited maximum inhibition against all the test pathogens. Among the eight fermentation media tested, inorganic salts starch broth recorded the best for antibacterial production. The ethyl acetate crude extract exhibited antioxidant properties with IC50 value of 30 μg/mL and had no cytotoxicity towards L6, H9c2 and RAW 264.7 cell lines up to a concentration of 50 μg/mL. Maximum metabolite production was achieved in pH 7.0 at 35°C after 7 days incubation. The significant media components for maximum metabolite production were optimized through response surface methodology employing Plackett-Burman and Box-Behnken designs. The composition of the final optimized medium was soluble starch, 14.97g; (NH4)2SO4, 2.89g; K2HPO4, 2.07g; MgSO4.7H2O, 1g; NaCl, 1g, CaCO3, 2g; FeSO4.7H2O, 1mg; MnCl2.7H2O, 1mg; and ZnSO4.7H2O, 1mg per litre of distilled water. The optimization resulted an antibacterial activity of 28±1.5mm against S. epidermidis which was in close accordance with the predicted value of 30 mm. It is also evident from the result that an increase of 86.66% antibacterial production was recorded in optimized media. The chosen method was economical, efficient and useful for future antibacterial drug discovery from a broad spectrum metabolite producer like Streptomyces nogalater NIIST A30.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28437452 PMCID: PMC5402949 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175919
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
In vitro antibacterial activity of NIIST A30 against test pathogens.
| Test pathogen | Zone of inhibition (mm) |
|---|---|
| 41±1.15 | |
| 38±0.57 | |
| 42±2 | |
| 43±1 | |
| 32±2.5 | |
| 49±1.15 | |
| 53±1.15 | |
| 29±1.15 | |
| 49±1.15 | |
| 59±1.15 | |
| 54±1.73 |
* Values are average from three readings.
Fig 1Scanning electron microscopic image of spore arrangement.
Fig 2Phylogenetic tree showing the evolutionary relationship of the strain Streptomyces nogalater NIIST A30 with its related species.
Antibacterial activity of NIIST A30 crude extracts from different broths.
| Test pathogens | Zone of inhibition(mm) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSMB | ISP 1 | ISP 2 | ISP 4 | KB | NB | SDB | SCB | |
| 9±0.57 | 8±0.57 | 7.6±0.57 | 11±0 | 7±1 | 8±0 | 8±0.57 | ||
| 10±0 | 10±0 | 17.6±0.57 | 16±0 | 0 | 17±0 | 12.3±0.57 | ||
| 7.6±0.28 | 7.5±0.5 | 9±0 | 8±0.57 | 9.3±0.57 | 6±0 | 10±0 | ||
| 6.5±0.5 | 8.3±0.57 | 9±1 | 11±0 | 10.3±0.57 | 7±0 | 10.3±0.57 | ||
| 11±1 | 10±1 | 10±1 | 11.3±0.28 | 6±0 | 6±0 | 9.16±0.28 | ||
| 9.3±0.57 | 0 | 7.6±0.57 | 6.8±0.28 | 0 | 8±0.57 | 9±1 | ||
| 7.5± | 0 | 8±0.57 | 10±0 | 10±0 | 11±0 | 10.3±0.28 | ||
| 9.3±0.28 | 10±0 | 10±0 | 8±0.57 | 7±0 | 8±0 | 10±0 | ||
| 13.3±0.28 | 12.3±0.28 | 11±1 | 14±0.57 | 12±0 | 13.3±0.28 | 14±0.57 | ||
| 10±0 | 11±0 | 6±1 | 10±0 | 12±0 | 7±0 | 8±0.57 | ||
| 10±1 | 5±0 | 9±0 | 8±0 | 10±0 | 7.6±0.57 | 5±0 | ||
*Values are average from three readings.
Fig 3Free radical scavenging activity of ethyl acetate crude extract.
Fig 4The effect of crude extract on normal cell line viabilities.
Fig 5Antimicrobial activity of NIIST A30 in different pH (A), temperature (B) and incubation period (C).
Range of variables used for PBD.
| Factor codes | Factors | Levels | |
|---|---|---|---|
| -1 (g/L) | +1 (g/L) | ||
| X1 | Starch | 7 | 13 |
| X2 | K2HPO4 | 0.5 | 1.5 |
| X3 | MgSO4.7H2O | 0.5 | 1.5 |
| X4 | NaCl | 0.5 | 1.5 |
| X5 | (NH4)2SO4 | 1 | 3 |
| X6 | CaCO3 | 1 | 3 |
Plackett-Burman experimental design.
| Run | Factors | Antibacterial Activity against | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | ||
| 1 | 7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 12 ± 1 |
| 2 | 13 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 21 ± 0.5 |
| 3 | 7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 3 | 3 | 17 ± 1.5 |
| 4 | 7 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 3 | 18 ±1 |
| 5 | 7 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 3 | 1 | 19 ± 0.5 |
| 6 | 13 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 3 | 1 | 25 ± 1 |
| 7 | 13 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 3 | 21 ± 0.5 |
| 8 | 13 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 3 | 3 | 24 ± 1.5 |
| 9 | 13 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3 | 3 | 22 ± 1 |
| 10 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 20 ± 0.5 |
| 11 | 7 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 3 | 18 ± 2 |
| 12 | 7 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 3 | 1 | 17 ± 1.5 |
| 13 | 13 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 21 ± 1 |
Statistical analysis of effects of variables (media components) on antibacterial activity employing Plackett-Burman design.
| Variables | Medium constituents | Effect | Confidence level (%) | Standard error coefficient | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | Starch | 1.833 | 7.34 | 0.125 | ||
| X2 | K2HPO4 | 5.000 | 3.34 | 0.749 | ||
| X3 | MgSO4.7H2O | 1.667 | 1.11 | 0.317 | 68.3 | 0.749 |
| X4 | NaCl | 1.000 | 0.67 | 0.534 | 41.6 | 0.749 |
| X5 | (NH4)2SO4 | 2.167 | 2.89 | 0.375 | ||
| X6 | CaCO3 | 0.833 | 1.11 | 0.317 | 68.3 | 0.375 |
*: at confidence level of 95%, values ≤ 0.05 is acceptable.
Fig 6(A) Pareto chart showing the effect of different variables (media components) on antibacterial metabolite production against S. epidermidis; (B) Response surface contour and 3D plots showing individual and interactive effects of variables on antibacterial activity of NIIST A30.
(a) and (b) Effects of (NH4)2SO4 and starch on antimicrobial activity(c) and (d) Effects of K2HPO4 and (NH4)2SO4 on antimicrobial activity (e) and (f) Effects of K2HPO4 and starch on antimicrobial activity.
Box-Behnken response surface design.
| RunOrder | Starch | (NH4)2SO4 | K2HPO4 | Antimicrobial Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 26 ± 1.5 |
| 2 | 15 | 3 | 2 | |
| 3 | 20 | 3 | 1 | 15 ± 1 |
| 4 | 15 | 5 | 3 | 22 ± 1.5 |
| 5 | 20 | 5 | 2 | 18 ± 1 |
| 6 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 13 ± 1.5 |
| 7 | 15 | 1 | 3 | 27 ± 0.5 |
| 8 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 16 ± 1 |
| 9 | 15 | 3 | 2 | |
| 10 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 17 ± 0.5 |
| 11 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 23 ± 1 |
| 12 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 15 ± 1 |
| 13 | 20 | 1 | 2 | 16 ± 0.5 |
| 14 | 15 | 3 | 2 | |
| 15 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 14 ± 1 |
Analysis of variance of fitted quadratic model.
| Source | Degrees of freedom | Sum of Squares | Mean Sum of squares | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 9 | 567.150 | 63.017 | 252.07 | 0.000 |
| Error (Residual) | 5 | 1.250 | 0.250 | ||
| Lack-of-Fit | 3 | 1.250 | 0.417 | ||
| Pure Error | 2 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| Total | 14 | 568.400 |
Determination of co-efficient, R2 = 0.9648; Adjusted determination of co-efficient, Adj R2 = 0.9938.