Abhijeet Anand1, Natalie A Molodecky2, Mark A Pallansch3, Roland W Sutter2. 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: aanand@cdc.gov. 2. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The polio eradication endgame strategic plan calls for the sequential removal of Sabin poliovirus serotypes from the trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (tOPV), starting with type 2, and the introduction of ≥1 dose of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV), to maintain an immunity base against poliovirus type 2. The global removal of oral poliovirus type 2 was successfully implemented in May 2016. However, IPV supply constraints has prevented introduction in 21 countries and led to complete stock-out in >20 countries. METHODS: We conducted a literature review and contacted corresponding authors of recent studies with fractional-dose IPV (fIPV), one-fifth of intramuscular dose administered intradermally, to conduct additional type 2 immunogenicity analyses of two fIPV doses compared with one full-dose IPV. RESULTS: Four studies were identified that assessed immunogenicity of two fIPV doses compared to one full-dose IPV. Two fractional doses are more immunogenic than 1 full-dose, with type 2 seroconversion rates improving between absolute 19-42% (median: 37%, p<0.001) and relative increase of 53-125% (median: 82%), and antibody titer to type 2 increasing by 2-32-fold (median: 10-fold). Early age of administration and shorter intervals between doses were associated with lower immunogenicity. DISCUSSION: Overall, two fIPV doses are more immunogenic than a single full-dose, associated with significantly increased seroconversion rates and antibody titers. Two fIPV doses together use two-fifth of the vaccine compared to one full-dose IPV. In response to the current IPV shortage, a schedule of two fIPV doses at ages 6 and 14weekshas been endorsed by technical oversight committees and has been introduced in some affected countries.
INTRODUCTION: The polio eradication endgame strategic plan calls for the sequential removal of Sabin poliovirus serotypes from the trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (tOPV), starting with type 2, and the introduction of ≥1 dose of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV), to maintain an immunity base against poliovirus type 2. The global removal of oral poliovirus type 2 was successfully implemented in May 2016. However, IPV supply constraints has prevented introduction in 21 countries and led to complete stock-out in >20 countries. METHODS: We conducted a literature review and contacted corresponding authors of recent studies with fractional-dose IPV (fIPV), one-fifth of intramuscular dose administered intradermally, to conduct additional type 2 immunogenicity analyses of two fIPV doses compared with one full-dose IPV. RESULTS: Four studies were identified that assessed immunogenicity of two fIPV doses compared to one full-dose IPV. Two fractional doses are more immunogenic than 1 full-dose, with type 2 seroconversion rates improving between absolute 19-42% (median: 37%, p<0.001) and relative increase of 53-125% (median: 82%), and antibody titer to type 2 increasing by 2-32-fold (median: 10-fold). Early age of administration and shorter intervals between doses were associated with lower immunogenicity. DISCUSSION: Overall, two fIPV doses are more immunogenic than a single full-dose, associated with significantly increased seroconversion rates and antibody titers. Two fIPV doses together use two-fifth of the vaccine compared to one full-dose IPV. In response to the current IPV shortage, a schedule of two fIPV doses at ages 6 and 14weekshas been endorsed by technical oversight committees and has been introduced in some affected countries.
Authors: Cynthia J Snider; Khalequ Zaman; Concepcion F Estivariz; Mohammad Yunus; William C Weldon; Kathleen A Wannemuehler; M Steven Oberste; Mark A Pallansch; Steven Gf Wassilak; Tajul Islam A Bari; Abhijeet Anand Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-05-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Gabriel Trueba; Vishali Jeyaseelan; Lazaro Lopez; Bernardo A Mainou; Yiting Zhang; Alvaro Whittembury; Alfredo Jose Olmedo Valarezo; Gonzalo Baquero; Rosa Romero de Aguinaga; Lucia Jeannete Zurita Salinas; Maria Gabriela Santacruz Mancheno; Diana Elizabeth Medina Chacho; Emmanuelle Quentin; Ana Elena Chevez; Gloria Rey-Benito; Ondrej Mach Journal: Lancet Reg Health Am Date: 2022-07
Authors: Ali F Saleem; Ondrej Mach; Mohammad T Yousafzai; Asia Khan; William C Weldon; M Steven Oberste; Syed S Zaidi; Muhammad M Alam; Farheen Quadri; Roland W Sutter; Anita K M Zaidi Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Deepa Gamage; Ondrej Mach; Paba Palihawadana; Yiting Zhang; William C Weldon; M Steven Oberste; Sunethra Gunasena; Roland W Sutter Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 7.759
Authors: Oumar Guindo; Ondrej Mach; Seydou Doumbia; Daniel K Ekra; Abdoul H Beavogui; William C Weldon; M Steven Oberste; Roland W Sutter Journal: Vaccine Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 4.169
Authors: Deepa Gamage; Ondrej Mach; Samitha Ginige; William C Weldon; M Steven Oberste; Visalakshi Jeyaseelan; Roland W Sutter Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 7.759
Authors: Ali Faisal Saleem; Ondrej Mach; Mohammad Tahir Yousafzai; Zaubina Kazi; Attaullah Baig; Muhammad Sajid; Vishali Jeyaseelan; Roland W Sutter; Anita K M Zaidi Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2021-04-08 Impact factor: 5.226