Literature DB >> 28433672

Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series - Paper 1: introduction.

Susan J Bartlett1, Sara Ahmed2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient-centered health care, where we design and deliver care to address the needs and preferences of patients, represents an important paradigm shift. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are critical to capture the patient voice, understand how illness and treatments affect people, and establish how well services and treatments address what matters most to patients.
OBJECTIVE: Originally developed for use in research, PROs are now used to monitor individuals and populations, manage care, evaluate services and providers, and inform policy. However, moving PROs beyond research settings incurs considerable methodological, organizational, technological, and ethical considerations. National collaborative networks of researchers, clinicians, patients, and other stakeholders can address these challenges by coordinating development, creating standards for use, sharing costs and delivery platforms, and improving widespread uptake of core sets of measures to better inform health care decisions and improve outcomes. DISCUSSION: We introduce eight papers from researchers, clinicians, patients, and decision makers who participated in deliberations around creating a national network to accelerate the application and harmonized use of PROs in Canada. They offer a snap shot of the strategies that pioneers and innovative thinkers are using to integrate the patient voice into comprehensive care, research, and health policy planning of chronic diseases.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health care policy; Patient-centered health care; Patient-reported outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28433672      PMCID: PMC5677513          DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  6 in total

1.  Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series-Paper 7: modern perspectives of measurement validation emphasize justification of inferences based on patient reported outcome scores.

Authors:  Richard Sawatzky; Eric K H Chan; Bruno D Zumbo; Sara Ahmed; Susan J Bartlett; Clifton O Bingham; William Gardner; Jeffrey Jutai; Ayse Kuspinar; Tolulope Sajobi; Lisa M Lix
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series - Paper 3: patient-reported outcomes can facilitate shared decision-making and guide self-management.

Authors:  Vanessa K Noonan; Anne Lyddiatt; Patrick Ware; Susan B Jaglal; Richard J Riopelle; Clifton O Bingham; Sabrina Figueiredo; Richard Sawatzky; Maria Santana; Susan J Bartlett; Sara Ahmed
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series - Paper 6: creating national initiatives to support development and use-the PROMIS example.

Authors:  Susan J Bartlett; James Witter; David Cella; Sara Ahmed
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series - Paper 5: patient-reported outcomes can be linked to epidemiologic measures to monitor populations and inform public health decisions.

Authors:  Hiroshi Mamiya; Lisa M Lix; William Gardner; Susan J Bartlett; Sara Ahmed; David L Buckeridge
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series - Paper 4: patient-reported outcomes can inform clinical decision making in chronic care.

Authors:  Clifton O Bingham; Vanessa K Noonan; Claudine Auger; Debbie E Feldman; Sara Ahmed; Susan J Bartlett
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series - Paper 9: anonymization and ethics considerations for capturing and sharing patient reported outcomes.

Authors:  Luk Arbuckle; Ester Moher; Susan J Bartlett; Sara Ahmed; Khaled El Emam
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 6.437

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Patient Decision Aid vs Educational Material on Decision Quality, Shared Decision-Making, Patient Experience, and Functional Outcomes in Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Prakash Jayakumar; Meredith G Moore; Kenneth A Furlough; Lauren M Uhler; John P Andrawis; Karl M Koenig; Nazan Aksan; Paul J Rathouz; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-02-01

2.  Psycholinguistic features, design attributes, and respondent-reported cognition predict response time to patient-reported outcome measure items.

Authors:  Matthew L Cohen; Aaron J Boulton; Alyssa M Lanzi; Elyse Sutherland; Rebecca Hunting Pompon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Mortality, morbidity and health in developed societies: a review of data sources.

Authors:  Guillaume Wunsch; Catherine Gourbin
Journal:  Genus       Date:  2018-01-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.