Literature DB >> 28435100

Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series - Paper 5: patient-reported outcomes can be linked to epidemiologic measures to monitor populations and inform public health decisions.

Hiroshi Mamiya1, Lisa M Lix2, William Gardner3, Susan J Bartlett4, Sara Ahmed5, David L Buckeridge6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A comprehensive picture of population health status can be captured by the incorporation of patient-reported outcome measures into population health monitoring.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify the current state, opportunities, and future research related to the utilization of patient-reported outcome measures for population health monitoring in Canada. DISCUSSIONS: Patient-reported outcome measures can help to identify community health needs in public health topics including injury, chronic disease, and communicable disease. They are currently collected in major national surveys in Canada, while electronic medical records, personal health records, and online patient communities could facilitate rapid and cost-effective collection of population-based data. Their effective use requires well-validated measurements and consideration to the factors affecting validity and reproducibility and the modes of administering questionnaires. Methodologically, relevant public health application of patient-reported outcome measures includes analysis assessing measurement comparability across sociodemographically and clinically diverse population and the influence of physical and social environment. Research is needed to develop and apply analytical methods, harmonize patient-reported outcome measures across data sources and health jurisdictions, and link these measures to traditional epidemiologic indicators. Achieving these goals will benefit from collaboration among governmental agencies and expert groups.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disease and risk factor surveillance; Health-related quality of life; Patient-reported outcome measure; Population health

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28435100     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  6 in total

1.  Advancing the symptom science model with environmental health.

Authors:  Jessica Castner; Azita Amiri; Jeannie Rodriguez; Luz Huntington-Moskos; Lisa M Thompson; Shuang Zhao; Barbara Polivka
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 1.462

2.  Baseline health-related quality of life predicts falls: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer C Davis; Chun Liang Hsu; Cheyenne Ghag; Samantha Y Starkey; Patrizio Jacova; Larry Dian; Naaz Parmar; Kenneth Madden; Teresa Liu-Ambrose
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.440

3.  Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series - Paper 1: introduction.

Authors:  Susan J Bartlett; Sara Ahmed
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Raising the profile of pilot and feasibility studies in relation to the development, evaluation and implementation of patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  Georgina Jones
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2017-06-17

5.  Challenges and opportunities for using population health data to investigate cancer survivors' quality of life in Australia.

Authors:  Imogen Ramsey; Nadia Corsini; Amanda Hutchinson; Julie Marker; Marion Eckert
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.440

6.  Age and Gender Confound PROMIS Scores in Spine Patients With Back and Neck Pain.

Authors:  David S Jevotovsky; Jared C Tishelman; Nicholas Stekas; Michael J Moses; Raj J Karia; Ethan W Ayres; Charla R Fischer; Aaron J Buckland; Thomas J Errico; Themistocles S Protopsaltis
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-02-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.