| Literature DB >> 28432665 |
Gonzalo Ferrara1, Vanina S Kanoore Edul1, Héctor S Canales1, Enrique Martins1, Carlos Canullán1, Gastón Murias1, Mario O Pozo1, Juan F Caminos Eguillor1, María G Buscetti1, Can Ince2, Arnaldo Dubin3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The microvascular reperfusion injury after retransfusion has not been completely characterized. Specifically, the question of heterogeneity among different microvascular beds needs to be addressed. In addition, the identification of anaerobic metabolism is elusive. The venoarterial PCO2 to arteriovenous oxygen content difference ratio (Pv-aCO2/Ca-vO2) might be a surrogate for respiratory quotient, but this has not been validated. Therefore, our goal was to characterize sublingual and intestinal (mucosal and serosal) microvascular injury after blood resuscitation in hemorrhagic shock and its relation with O2 and CO2 metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: Hemorrhage; Hypoxia; Microcirculation; Shock; Transfusion
Year: 2017 PMID: 28432665 PMCID: PMC5400770 DOI: 10.1186/s40635-017-0136-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp ISSN: 2197-425X
Hemoglobin, systemic and intestinal hemodynamic and oxygen transport variables, and arterial blood gases in hemorrhage/retransfusion (H/R) and sham groups
| Hemorrhage | Retransfusion | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 30′ | 60′ | 90′ | 2′ | 30′ | 60′ | ||
| Hemoglobin (g per 100 mL) | H/R | 8.3 [7.7–9.7] | 7.8 [7.3–9.1]† | 7.3 [7.0–9.1]*† | 6.5 [6.1–7.7]*† | 8.0 [6.9–9.3]† | 7.8 [7.7–9.7] | 8.1 [7.2–9.7] |
| Sham | 9.9 [9.3–10.3] | 9.9 [9.5–10.4] | 9.8 [9.3–10.5] | 9.6 [9.2–9.8] | 9.6 [9.2–9.8] | 9.3 [8.8–9.8] | 9.4 [8.6–10.0] | |
| Mean arterial pressure (mmHg) | H/R | 83 [72–96] | 42 [34–47]*† | 40 [32–44]*† | 28 [22–30]*† | 95 [90–100] | 90 [82–99] | 91 [79–97] |
| Sham | 91 [90–102] | 97 [80–109] | 92 [89–102] | 99 [91–109] | 98 [90–108] | 100 [92–112] | 100 [91–110] | |
| Central venous pressure (mmHg) | H/R | 3 [0–6] | 3 [1–6] | 4 [1–7] | 4 [0–7] | 6 [1–9] | 3 [1–5] | 3 [0–5] |
| Sham | 2 [1–2] | 2 [1–4] | 3 [1–3] | 2 [1–4] | 2 [1–4] | 2 [1–4] | 2 [1–4] | |
| Mean pulmonary pressure (mmHg) | H/R | 17 [10–20] | 12 [7–17] | 11 [8–13] | 10 [6–12]*† | 22 [17–32]† | 18 [12–20] | 16 [13–19] |
| Sham | 11 [10–13] | 13 [12–14] | 14 [13–15] | 13 [12–13] | 13 [12–13] | 14 [13–15] | 13 [11–16] | |
| Pulmonary occlusion pressure (mmHg) | H/R | 5 [4–7] | 6 [1–8] | 4 [1–8] | 6 [0–7] | 7 [4–9] | 5 [2–9] | 4 [2–7] |
| Sham | 3 [2–6] | 2 [2–4] | 2 [2–3] | 3 [3–4] | 3 [3–4] | 2 [1–4] | 2 [2–3] | |
| Cardiac index (mL min−1 kg−1) | H/R | 155 [136–177] | 89 [64–177] | 78 [70–119] | 53 [39–72]*† | 210 [158–340]† | 133 [116–179] | 134 [102–180] |
| Sham | 122 [101–149] | 122 [100–151] | 108 [97–167] | 99 [94–168] | 101 [96–112] | 110 [99–178] | 113 [96–174] | |
| Mesenteric flow (mL min−1 per 100 g) | H/R | 805 [489–903] | 451 [253–665] | 427 [264–576] | 236 [110–332]*† | 1052 [644–1406]† | 850 [550–1072] | 923 [523–986] |
| Sham | 457 [445–786] | 500 [457–992] | 445 [426–743] | 457 [379–714] | 448 [428–750] | 487 [457–892] | 502 [487–814] | |
| Arterial pH | H/R | 7.44 [7.35–7.49] | 7.44 [7.39–7.49] | 7.44 [7.40–7.49] | 7.42 [7.39–7.48] | 7.28 [7.20–7.37]*† | 7.37 [7.29–7.43]† | 7.41 [7.32–7.45]† |
| Sham | 7.49 [7.42–7.51] | 7.49 [7.39–7.56] | 7.52 [7.41–7.52] | 7.53 [7.42–54] | 7.52 [7.41–7.53] | 7.51 [7.44–55] | 7.55 [7.42–54] | |
| Arterial PCO2 (mmHg) | H/R | 38 [37–40] | 36 [35–39] | 36 [33–39] | 34 [31–36]* | 44 [41–52]*† | 38 [36–42] | 39 [34–41] |
| Sham | 38 [33–40] | 37 [35–40] | 36 [34–39] | 34 [33–39] | 34 [33–39] | 34 [32–38] | 34 [32–38] | |
| Arterial PO2 (mmHg) | H/R | 86 [77–91] | 83 [77–93] | 88 [77–95] | 92 [87–106] | 75 [69–84]*† | 86 [75–92] | 85 [77–94] |
| Sham | 87 [78–93] | 83 [81–87] | 87 [83–95] | 87 [78–99] | 91 [74–99] | 88 [87–100] | 89 [85–99] | |
| Arterial bicarbonate (mEq L−1) | H/R | 26 [21–28] | 25 [22–27] | 23 [20–26]* | 23 [18–25]*† | 23 [18–25]*† | 23 [19–25]*† | 24 [19–27]† |
| Sham | 26 [25–28] | 29 [23–31] | 28 [25–29] | 27 [25–29] | 27 [25–29] | 27 [25–28] | 28 [25–30] | |
| Arterial base excess (mEq L−1) | H/R | 2 [−4 to 4] | 1 [−2 to 5] | 2 [−2 to 3] | −1 [−5 to 3]*† | −3 [−9 to 0]*† | −2 [−6 to 1]*† | −1 [−6 to 2]† |
| Sham | 3 [−3 to 5] | 5 [−2 to 9] | 5 [1–6] | 4 [0–6] | 4 [0–6] | 4 [0–5] | 5 [1–8] | |
Data are shown as median [percentile 0.25–0.75]
*P < 0.05 vs. basal; †P < 0.05 vs. sham
Fig. 1Behavior of systemic and intestinal O2 transport and consumption. a Systemic O2 transport. b Systemic O2 consumption. c Intestinal O2 transport. d Intestinal O2 consumption
Fig. 2Behavior of the respiratory quotient and the venoarterial PCO2 to arteriovenous oxygen content difference ratio (Pv-aCO2/Ca-vO2). a Respiratory quotient. b Pv-aCO2/Ca-vO2. c Correlation between respiratory quotient and Pv-aCO2/Ca-vO2
Fig. 3Behavior of intramucosal-arterial PCO2 difference and arterial lactate. a Intramucosal-arterial PCO2 difference. b Arterial lactate
Systemic CO2 production and venoarterial PCO2 differences in hemorrhage/retransfusion (H/R) and sham groups
| Hemorrhage | Retransfusion | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 30′ | 60′ | 90′ | 2′ | 30′ | 60′ | ||
| CO2 production (mL min−1 kg−1) | H/R | 4.5 [4.2–5.0] | 4.1 [3.6–5.3] | 4.3 [3.8–4.8] | 3.6 [3.0–4.4]*† | 6.2 [5.0–7.5]*† | 4.7 [4.2–6.4] | 4.7 [4.0–5.3] |
| Sham | 4.9 [4.5–5.4] | 4.8 [4.7–5.8] | 4.9 [4.4–6.0] | 4.8 [4.5–5.3] | 4.8 [4.5–5.4] | 4.8 [4.3–5.8] | 4.5 [4.3–5.9] | |
| Mixed venoarterial PCO2 (mmHg) | H/R | 6 [5–7]† | 10 [7–12]* | 11 [9–12]*† | 16 [14–20]*† | 9 [4–12] | 8 [6–10] | 8 [7–10] |
| Sham | 8 [7–10] | 7 [6–8] | 6 [6–8] | 6 [6–8] | 7 [6–8] | 7 [6–8] | 6 [5–7] | |
| Mesenteric venoarterial PCO2 (mmHg) | H/R | 5 [5–6] | 8 [8–10]*† | 11 [10–12]*† | 15 [12–22]*† | 6 [4–13] | 6 [5–11] | 6 [5–7] |
| Sham | 6 [4–12] | 5 [4–6] | 6 [5–7] | 6 [5–7] | 6 [5–7] | 6 [4–9] | 5 [4–7] | |
Data are shown as median [percentile 0.25–0.75]
*P < 0.05 vs. basal; †P < 0.05 vs. sham
Fig. 4Behavior of the intestinal mucosal microcirculatory variables. a Total vascular density. b Perfused vascular density. c Proportion of perfused vessels. d Microvascular flow index. e Red blood cell velocity. f Heterogeneity flow index
Fig. 5Behavior of the intestinal serosal microcirculatory variables. a Total vascular density. b Perfused vascular density. c Proportion of perfused vessels. d Microvascular flow index. e Red blood cell velocity. f Heterogeneity flow index
Fig. 6Behavior of the sublingual microcirculatory variables. a Total vascular density. b Perfused vascular density. c Proportion of perfused vessels. d Microvascular flow index. e Red blood cell velocity. f Heterogeneity flow index