| Literature DB >> 25625013 |
Vanina Siham Kanoore Edul1, Can Ince2, Noelia Navarro3, Luciana Previgliano3, Alejandro Risso-Vazquez3, Paolo Nahuel Rubatto3, Arnaldo Dubin4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study was performed to compare intestinal and sublingual microcirculation and their response to a fluid challenge.Entities:
Keywords: Abdominal surgery; Fluid challenge; Intestine; Microcirculation; Septic shock; Sublingual; Tissue perfusion
Year: 2014 PMID: 25625013 PMCID: PMC4298674 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-014-0039-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Intensive Care ISSN: 2110-5820 Impact factor: 6.925
Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the patients ( = 22)
| Gender, male ( | 10 (45) |
| Age (years) | 71 ± 16 |
| APACHE II score | 20 ± 8 |
| SOFA score | 7 ± 3 |
| Use of norepinephrine | |
| Number of patients ( | 18 (82) |
| Dosage (μg/kg/min) | 0.30 ± 0.23 |
| Mechanical ventilation ( | 21 (95) |
| Tidal volume (mL/kg) | 6.1 ± 1.3 |
| Fluid intake in the first day (mL/24 h) | 4,513 ± 2,063 |
| Urine output in the first day (mL/24 h) | 1,241 ± 836 |
| Fluid balance in the first day (mL/24 h) | 3,273 ± 2,110 |
| ICU length of stay (days) | 7 ± 5 |
| Hospital length of stay (days) | 16 ± 12 |
| ICU mortality ( | 11 (50) |
| Hospital mortality ( | 11 (50) |
Systemic cardiovascular variables and tissue perfusion parameters before and after the fluid challenge
| Heart rate (beats/min) | 87 ± 27 | 86 ± 23 | 0.45 |
| Mean arterial blood pressure (mm Hg) | 68 ± 11 | 82 ± 12 | <0.0001 |
| Central venous pressure (mm Hg) | 10 ± 4 | 12 ± 6 | <0.01 |
| Intra-abdominal pressure (mm Hg) | 8 ± 3 | 8 ± 3 | 0.33 |
| Abdominal perfusion pressure (mm Hg) | 61 ± 11 | 74 ± 13 | <0.0001 |
| Cardiac index (L/min/m2) | 2.6 ± 0.5 | 3.3 ± 1.0 | <0.01 |
| Respiratory pulse pressure variation (%) | 10 ± 6 | 7 ± 3 | <0.02 |
| Arterial lactate (mmol/L) | 2.8 ± 2.2 | 2.7 ± 2.3 | 0.29 |
| Central venous oxygen saturation (%) | 72 ± 7 | 74 ± 9 | 0.21 |
| Central venous arterial PCO2 (mm Hg) | 6 ± 2 | 5 ± 2 | <0.05 |
| Central-peripheral temperature (°C) | 5.0 ± 1.9 | 5.1 ± 2.2 | 0.78 |
| Sublingual microcirculation | | | |
| Total vascular density (mm/mm2) | 16.4 ± 1.8 | 16.8 ± 1.0 | 0.19 |
| Perfused vascular density (mm/mm2) | 15.2 ± 2.9 | 16.1 ± 1.2 | 0.08 |
| Proportion of perfused vessels | 0.92 ± 0.14 | 0.96 ± 0.05 | 0.23 |
| Microvascular flow index | 2.6 ± 0.5 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 0.12 |
| Red blood cell velocity (μm/s) | 912 ± 270 | 1,064 ± 200 | <0.002 |
| Heterogeneity flow index | 1.2 ± 0.6 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.09 |
| CV red blood cell velocity | 0.49 ± 0.24 | 0.40 ± 0.15 | <0.03 |
| Intestinal microcirculation | | | |
| Total vascular density (mm/mm2) | 16.9 ± 1.8 | 17.4 ± 1.9 | 0.22 |
| Perfused vascular density (mm/mm2) | 12.3 ± 6.7 | 13.0 ± 6.7 | 0.25 |
| Proportion of perfused vessels | 0.73 ± 0.39 | 0.73 ± 0.37 | 0.88 |
| Microvascular flow index | 2.0 ± 1.1 | 2.1 ± 1.1 | 0.34 |
| Red blood cell velocity (μm/s) | 679 ± 379 | 747 ± 419 | 0.12 |
| Heterogeneity flow index | 8.9 ± 18.0 | 15.4 ± 42.7 | 0.28 |
| CV red blood cell velocity | 0.46 ± 0.36 | 0.37 ± 0.26 | 0.31 |
Figure 1Red blood cell (RBC) velocity. (A) Correlation between basal sublingual and intestinal RBC velocity. (B) Correlation between the changes in sublingual and intestinal RBC velocities in response to the fluid challenge. (C) Correlation between the changes in cardiac index and sublingual RBC velocity in response to the fluid challenge. (D) Correlation between the changes in sublingual RBC velocity in response to the fluid challenge and the basal sublingual RBC velocity. (E) Correlation between the changes in cardiac index and intestinal RBC velocity in response to the fluid challenge. (F) Correlation between the changes in intestinal RBC velocity in response to the fluid challenge and the basal intestinal RBC velocity.
Figure 2Perfused vascular density (PVD). (A) Correlation between basal sublingual and intestinal PVD. (B) Correlation between the changes in sublingual and intestinal PVD in response to the fluid challenge. (C) Correlation between the changes in cardiac index and sublingual PVD in response to the fluid challenge. (D) Correlation between the changes in sublingual PVD in response to the fluid challenge and the basal sublingual PVD. (E) Correlation between the changes in cardiac index and intestinal PVD in response to the fluid challenge. (F) Correlation between the changes in intestinal PVD in response to the fluid challenge and the basal intestinal PVD.
Figure 3Sublingual and intestinal microcirculatory variables in survivor and nonsurvivor patients.