Literature DB >> 15766815

Gender disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: large-scale observations from the CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) National Quality Improvement Initiative.

Andra L Blomkalns1, Anita Y Chen, Judith S Hochman, Eric D Peterson, Kelly Trynosky, Deborah B Diercks, Gerard X Brogan, William E Boden, Matthew T Roe, E Magnus Ohman, W Brian Gibler, L Kristin Newby.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that significant disparities in gender exist in the management of patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACS).
BACKGROUND: Gender-related differences in the diagnosis and treatment of ACS have important healthcare implications. No large-scale examination of these disparities has been completed since the publication of the revised American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for management of patients with NSTE ACS.
METHODS: Using data from the CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) National Quality Improvement Initiative, we examined differences of gender in treatment and outcomes among patients with NSTE ACS.
RESULTS: Women (41% of 35,875 patients) were older (median age 73 vs. 65 years) and more often had diabetes and hypertension. Women were less likely to receive acute heparin, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and less commonly received aspirin, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and statins at discharge. The use of cardiac catheterization and revascularization was higher in men, but among patients with significant coronary disease, percutaneous revascularization was performed in a similar proportion of women and men. Women were at higher risk for unadjusted in-hospital death (5.6% vs. 4.3%), reinfarction (4.0% vs. 3.5%), heart failure (12.1% vs. 8.8%), stroke (1.1% vs. 0.8%), and red blood cell transfusion (17.2% vs. 13.2%), but after adjustment, only transfusion was higher in women.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite presenting with higher risk characteristics and having higher in-hospital risk, women with NSTE ACS are treated less aggressively than men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15766815     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  135 in total

1.  Sex-related differences in prognosis after myocardial infarction: changes from 1978 to 2007.

Authors:  María Grau; Cristina Sala; Joan Sala; Rafael Masia; Joan Vila; Isaac Subirana; Rafel Ramos; Roberto Elosua; Ramón Brugada; Jaume Marrugat
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Inadequate medical treatment of patients with coronary artery disease by primary care physicians in Germany.

Authors:  B Bischoff; Sigmund Silber; B M Richartz; L Pieper; J Klotsche; H-U Wittchen
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Sex in the CCU: women with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome may do no worse despite less intervention.

Authors:  Pamela J Bradshaw; Peter L Thompson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Age and gender trends in implantable cardioverter defibrillator utilization: a population based study.

Authors:  Grace Lin; Ryan A Meverden; David O Hodge; Daniel Z Uslan; David L Hayes; Peter A Brady
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 5.  Drugs for cardiovascular disease prevention in women: implications of the AHA Guidelines--2007 Update.

Authors:  Nanette K Wenger
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Differences in admission rates and outcomes between men and women presenting to emergency departments with coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Padma Kaul; Wei-Ching Chang; Cynthia M Westerhout; Michelle M Graham; Paul W Armstrong
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Does gender influence emergency department management and outcomes in geriatric abdominal pain?

Authors:  Rebekah L Gardner; Richard Almeida; Judith H Maselli; Andrew Auerbach
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 8.  Gender Disparities in Presentation, Management, and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Matthew Liakos; Puja B Parikh
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Gender Disparities Across the Spectrum of Advanced Cardiac Therapies: Real or Imagined?

Authors:  Roberta C Bogaev
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Women and ischemic heart disease: evolving knowledge.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Raffaelle Bugiardini; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.