Literature DB >> 27475138

Interactions between amplitude modulation and frequency modulation processing: Effects of age and hearing loss.

Nihaad Paraouty1, Stephan D Ewert2, Nicolas Wallaert1, Christian Lorenzi1.   

Abstract

Frequency modulation (FM) and amplitude modulation (AM) detection thresholds were measured for a 500-Hz carrier frequency and a 5-Hz modulation rate. For AM detection, FM at the same rate as the AM was superimposed with varying FM depth. For FM detection, AM at the same rate was superimposed with varying AM depth. The target stimuli always contained both amplitude and frequency modulations, while the standard stimuli only contained the interfering modulation. Young and older normal-hearing listeners, as well as older listeners with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss were tested. For all groups, AM and FM detection thresholds were degraded in the presence of the interfering modulation. AM detection with and without interfering FM was hardly affected by either age or hearing loss. While aging had an overall detrimental effect on FM detection with and without interfering AM, there was a trend that hearing loss further impaired FM detection in the presence of AM. Several models using optimal combination of temporal-envelope cues at the outputs of off-frequency filters were tested. The interfering effects could only be predicted for hearing-impaired listeners. This indirectly supports the idea that, in addition to envelope cues resulting from FM-to-AM conversion, normal-hearing listeners use temporal fine-structure cues for FM detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27475138     DOI: 10.1121/1.4955078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Robust Neuronal Discrimination in Primary Auditory Cortex Despite Degradations of Spectro-temporal Acoustic Details: Comparison Between Guinea Pigs with Normal Hearing and Mild Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Yonane Aushana; Samira Souffi; Jean-Marc Edeline; Christian Lorenzi; Chloé Huetz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-04

2.  Assessing the Role of Place and Timing Cues in Coding Frequency and Amplitude Modulation as a Function of Age.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-20

3.  Dual Coding of Frequency Modulation in the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus.

Authors:  Nihaad Paraouty; Arkadiusz Stasiak; Christian Lorenzi; Léo Varnet; Ian M Winter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Identifying cues for tone-in-noise detection using decision variable correlation in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kassidy N Amburgey; Kristina S Abrams; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of Age and Hearing Loss on the Discrimination of Amplitude and Frequency Modulation for 2- and 10-Hz Rates.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Sashi Mariathasan; Aleksander P Sęk
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Consistent pre-stimulus influences on auditory perception across the lifespan.

Authors:  Steven W McNair; Stephanie J Kayser; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  A Comparison of Behavioral Methods for Indexing the Auditory Processing of Temporal Fine Structure Cues.

Authors:  Eric C Hoover; Brianna N Kinney; Karen L Bell; Frederick J Gallun; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Effects of age on psychophysical measures of auditory temporal processing and speech reception at low and high levels.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Bottom-up and top-down neural signatures of disordered multi-talker speech perception in adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Kenneth E Hancock; Kara Bennett; Victor DeGruttola; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  The role of cochlear place coding in the perception of frequency modulation.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.